Original article
Comparative cross-sectional study of masticatory performance and mastication predominance for patients with missing posterior teeth

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.04.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

Missing posterior teeth can decrease masticatory function and cause horizontal mastication deviation, i.e., mastication predominance. Mastication predominance may lead to abnormal tooth attrition and temporomandibular disorders. This study evaluated masticatory performance and mastication predominance in patients with missing posterior teeth to investigate effects of missing posterior teeth on masticatory performance and mastication predominance.

Methods

Thirty volunteers with normal dentition (control group), 30 patients with unilateral missing posterior teeth (unilateral group), and 23 patients with bilateral missing posterior teeth (bilateral group) participated. Gummy jellies were used to evaluate participants’ masticatory performance, and electromyography was used to assess the degree of mastication predominance. Chewing gums, gummy jellies, and peanuts were used as foods of various hardnesses for evaluating mastication predominance.

Results

Compared with the control group, masticatory performance did not differ in the unilateral group but was significantly decreased in the bilateral group. With chewing gum and gummy jellies, the degree of mastication predominance was significantly increased in both unilateral and bilateral groups than the control group. With peanuts, the degree of mastication predominance was significantly increased in the unilateral group than the control group.

Conclusions

Although masticatory performance was not decreased in the unilateral group, the degree of mastication predominance was increased. Decreased masticatory performance was observed in the bilateral group, and for foods with normal hardness and soft foods, the degree of mastication predominance was increased. These results suggested that mastication predominance should be considered in the recovery of masticatory performance in patients with missing posterior teeth.

Introduction

Tooth loss may occur due to a range of causes, including periodontal disease, dental caries, and external injury [1], and it has been reported that its prevalence increases with age. Posterior teeth are relatively prone to loss, for reasons such as difficulty in performing efficient dental hygiene in this area and the considerable occlusal force to which they are subjected [2]. Several studies have investigated effects of posterior teeth loss on masticatory function [3], [4], with most focusing on decreased masticatory performance resulting from decreased occlusal support [5], [6], [7], [8]. The restoration of missing posterior teeth is considered important because decreased masticatory performance can decrease the quality of life [9]. In contrast, it has also been reported that even if posterior teeth are missing, masticatory performance is not significantly affected unless occlusal support decreases markedly [10]. Therefore, it appears that decreased masticatory performance is related to the overall condition of the dentition, i.e., how many and which teeth are missing.

In addition, missing posterior teeth can cause horizontal deviation toward the chewing side with increased occlusal support, i.e., mastication predominance [11]. Mastication predominance involves differences among masticatory performance, occlusal force, and jaw movement patterns on left and right sides [12], [13], [14] and can also increase mastication frequency and food accumulation in the oral vestibule [15]. Furthermore, sustained mastication predominance may cause facial deformities, abnormal tooth attrition, tooth fracture, jaw dysfunction, and temporomandibular disorders [16]. Moreover, it has been reported that the degree of mastication predominance varies according to the type of food being consumed [17].

In routine clinical dentistry, patients with missing posterior teeth undergo prosthodontic treatment with removable partial dentures, fixed partial dentures, or dental implants. The overall aim of these treatments is to restore masticatory performance. However, the importance of improvement in mastication predominance should be considered as well. This, in turn, requires a detailed grasp of the state of masticatory performance and mastication predominance in patients with missing posterior teeth, which has not been investigated before.

The present study aimed to investigate how unilateral and bilateral missing posterior teeth affected masticatory performance and mastication predominance. For this, a study population comprising volunteers with normal dentition and patients with unilateral missing posterior teeth and those with bilateral missing posterior teeth was enrolled. These participants’ masticatory performance was evaluated with the use of gummy jellies, whereas the degree of mastication predominance was evaluated by means of a portable electromyography (EMG) device.

Section snippets

Study population

The study population comprised 30 volunteers with normal dentition (control group: 15 males, 15 females, mean age 26.9 ± 2.4 years), 30 patients with unilateral missing posterior teeth (unilateral group: 11 males, 19 females, mean age 63.8 ± 10.1 years), and 23 patients with bilateral missing posterior teeth (bilateral group: 5 males, 18 females, mean age 69.2 ± 7.0 years). Participants were selected on the basis of criteria outlined below.

For the control group, volunteers aged 20 years or older with

Number of missing teeth in unilateral and bilateral groups

The number of missing teeth in the unilateral group is shown in Table 1. In the unilateral group, the mean number of missing teeth was 2.1 ± 0.8, with 22 of 30 participants (73%) having 1 or 2 missing teeth. Differences in the number of missing teeth between left and right sides in the bilateral group is shown in Table 2. In the bilateral group, the mean number of missing teeth was 2.8 ± 1.1 on the right side and 2.6 ± 0.8 on the left side. The difference in numbers of teeth on left and right sides

Discussion

The present study involved cross-sectional research investigating masticatory performance and the degree of mastication predominance in individuals with normal dentition, and patients with unilateral and bilateral missing posterior teeth. Masticatory performance was evaluated with a method involving the use of gummy jellies. This method can be used to evaluate functions such as crushing, biting, and mixing in an integrated manner [18]. It has advantages of being a low-cost method for objective

Conclusions

Within the limitations of present study, it was suggested that posterior tooth loss causes mastication predominance. The improvement of not only masticatory performance but also mastication predominance should be considered when treating patients with missing posterior teeth, because mastication predominance is likely to have harmful effects on stomatognathic function.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors reported no conflicts of interest related to this study.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (21)

  • Association between masticatory performance and oral conditions in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    2023, Journal of Dentistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    52 studies in Asia (sample size, n = 13,784) 39 studies in Japan [9, 28-30, 32, 35-71] (n = 10,958) 5 studies in China [27, 72-76] (n = 1,863)

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is related to stress and chewing in saliva and salivary glands

    2020, Japanese Dental Science Review
    Citation Excerpt :

    Chewing involves the actions and effects of the masticatory muscles, saliva, teeth, temporomandibular joint, and tongue [34]. The quality of chewing can be evaluated as the chewing performance, or the capacity to reduce the food particle size when chewing peanuts for a standardized period [35]. Chewing performance has also been defined as the number of chews necessary to render food ready for swallowing [36].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text