Original articleComparative cross-sectional study of masticatory performance and mastication predominance for patients with missing posterior teeth
Introduction
Tooth loss may occur due to a range of causes, including periodontal disease, dental caries, and external injury [1], and it has been reported that its prevalence increases with age. Posterior teeth are relatively prone to loss, for reasons such as difficulty in performing efficient dental hygiene in this area and the considerable occlusal force to which they are subjected [2]. Several studies have investigated effects of posterior teeth loss on masticatory function [3], [4], with most focusing on decreased masticatory performance resulting from decreased occlusal support [5], [6], [7], [8]. The restoration of missing posterior teeth is considered important because decreased masticatory performance can decrease the quality of life [9]. In contrast, it has also been reported that even if posterior teeth are missing, masticatory performance is not significantly affected unless occlusal support decreases markedly [10]. Therefore, it appears that decreased masticatory performance is related to the overall condition of the dentition, i.e., how many and which teeth are missing.
In addition, missing posterior teeth can cause horizontal deviation toward the chewing side with increased occlusal support, i.e., mastication predominance [11]. Mastication predominance involves differences among masticatory performance, occlusal force, and jaw movement patterns on left and right sides [12], [13], [14] and can also increase mastication frequency and food accumulation in the oral vestibule [15]. Furthermore, sustained mastication predominance may cause facial deformities, abnormal tooth attrition, tooth fracture, jaw dysfunction, and temporomandibular disorders [16]. Moreover, it has been reported that the degree of mastication predominance varies according to the type of food being consumed [17].
In routine clinical dentistry, patients with missing posterior teeth undergo prosthodontic treatment with removable partial dentures, fixed partial dentures, or dental implants. The overall aim of these treatments is to restore masticatory performance. However, the importance of improvement in mastication predominance should be considered as well. This, in turn, requires a detailed grasp of the state of masticatory performance and mastication predominance in patients with missing posterior teeth, which has not been investigated before.
The present study aimed to investigate how unilateral and bilateral missing posterior teeth affected masticatory performance and mastication predominance. For this, a study population comprising volunteers with normal dentition and patients with unilateral missing posterior teeth and those with bilateral missing posterior teeth was enrolled. These participants’ masticatory performance was evaluated with the use of gummy jellies, whereas the degree of mastication predominance was evaluated by means of a portable electromyography (EMG) device.
Section snippets
Study population
The study population comprised 30 volunteers with normal dentition (control group: 15 males, 15 females, mean age 26.9 ± 2.4 years), 30 patients with unilateral missing posterior teeth (unilateral group: 11 males, 19 females, mean age 63.8 ± 10.1 years), and 23 patients with bilateral missing posterior teeth (bilateral group: 5 males, 18 females, mean age 69.2 ± 7.0 years). Participants were selected on the basis of criteria outlined below.
For the control group, volunteers aged 20 years or older with
Number of missing teeth in unilateral and bilateral groups
The number of missing teeth in the unilateral group is shown in Table 1. In the unilateral group, the mean number of missing teeth was 2.1 ± 0.8, with 22 of 30 participants (73%) having 1 or 2 missing teeth. Differences in the number of missing teeth between left and right sides in the bilateral group is shown in Table 2. In the bilateral group, the mean number of missing teeth was 2.8 ± 1.1 on the right side and 2.6 ± 0.8 on the left side. The difference in numbers of teeth on left and right sides
Discussion
The present study involved cross-sectional research investigating masticatory performance and the degree of mastication predominance in individuals with normal dentition, and patients with unilateral and bilateral missing posterior teeth. Masticatory performance was evaluated with a method involving the use of gummy jellies. This method can be used to evaluate functions such as crushing, biting, and mixing in an integrated manner [18]. It has advantages of being a low-cost method for objective
Conclusions
Within the limitations of present study, it was suggested that posterior tooth loss causes mastication predominance. The improvement of not only masticatory performance but also mastication predominance should be considered when treating patients with missing posterior teeth, because mastication predominance is likely to have harmful effects on stomatognathic function.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors reported no conflicts of interest related to this study.
References (21)
- et al.
Incidence and association of root fractures after prosthetic treatment
J Prosthodont Res
(2011) Early in contrast to recent methods to evaluate masticatory function in implant patients
J Prosthodont Res
(2012)- et al.
Absence of association between a preferred chewing side and its area of functional occlusal contact in the human dentition
Arch Oral Biol
(1992) - et al.
Gender difference in masticatory performance in dentate adults
J Prosthodont Res
(2012) Partial denture service
American textbook of prosthetic dentistry
(1942)Effect of occlusal support by implant prostheses on brain function
J Prosthodont Res
(2011)- et al.
Main occluding area in partially edentulous patients: changes before and after implant treatment
J Oral Rehabil
(2012) - et al.
Relationship between oral function and occlusal support in denture wearers
J Oral Rehabil
(2000) - et al.
Factors associated with masticatory performance in unilateral distal extension removable partial denture patients
J Prosthodont
(2006) - et al.
Masticatory performance, maximum occlusal force, and occlusal contact area in patients with bilaterally missing molars and distal extension removable partial dentures
Int J Prosthodont
(2009)
Cited by (21)
Association between masticatory performance and oral conditions in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2023, Journal of DentistryCitation Excerpt :52 studies in Asia (sample size, n = 13,784) 39 studies in Japan [9, 28-30, 32, 35-71] (n = 10,958) 5 studies in China [27, 72-76] (n = 1,863)
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is related to stress and chewing in saliva and salivary glands
2020, Japanese Dental Science ReviewCitation Excerpt :Chewing involves the actions and effects of the masticatory muscles, saliva, teeth, temporomandibular joint, and tongue [34]. The quality of chewing can be evaluated as the chewing performance, or the capacity to reduce the food particle size when chewing peanuts for a standardized period [35]. Chewing performance has also been defined as the number of chews necessary to render food ready for swallowing [36].
Association of tooth location, occlusal support and chewing ability with cognitive decline and incident dementia
2024, Journal of Clinical PeriodontologyMasticatory dysfunction in older adults: A scoping review
2023, Journal of Oral RehabilitationUsefulness of newly devised food intake score in removable denture wearers
2023, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation