ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Journal of Policy Modeling
Volume 30, Issue 2, March-April 2008, Pages 237-250
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (405 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.04.008    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2007 Society for Policy Modeling Published by Elsevier Inc.

R&D expenditures and U.S. economic growth: A disaggregated approach

Rajeev K. Goela, James E. Paynea and Rati RamCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aIllinois State University, USA

Received 1 November 2006; 
revised 1 March 2007; 
accepted 1 April 2007. 
Available online 8 May 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Based on U.S. data for the 48-year-period 1953–2000, this study makes a contribution on the R&D-growth relation along five dimensions. First, we note several descriptive patterns that may be regarded as stylized facts relative to R&D outlays in the U.S. during the half-century period. These include (a) a dramatic increase in the share of non-federal R&D outlays, (b) a corresponding decline in the share of federally funded R&D expenditure, and (c) an even more dramatic decline in the share of defense R&D spending. Second, in a departure from most of the literature on the topic, we study the R&D-growth nexus at a disaggregated level by considering the roles of federal, non-federal, and defense R&D outlays. Third, we use the relatively new bounds-testing and ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) procedures of Pesaran et al. [Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326] to estimate the (long run) relation between R&D outlays and growth in a fairly standard model. Fourth, contrary to the almost universal belief, our estimates indicate a larger role of federal R&D relative to non-federal R&D in growth, and also a stronger role of defense R&D than of non-defense (federal) R&D. Last, to the extent our estimates are reasonable, the above-noted temporal movements in the shares of federal, non-federal, and defense R&D outlays seem to reflect socially perverse trends in the context of economic growth and well-being, and indicate the need for appropriate policy interventions for a substantial enhancement of federal defense R&D and non-defense R&D outlays.

Keywords: R&D; Economic growth; Defense R&D; Federal R&D; Non-federal R&D

JEL classification codes: O38; O40; H40

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Model, data, and estimation methodology
2.1. Data
2.2. Estimation methodology
3. Main findings
4. Discussion and some additional considerations
5. Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements
Appendix A. Basic data on R&D funding in the United States: 1953–2000
References





Journal of Policy Modeling
Volume 30, Issue 2, March-April 2008, Pages 237-250
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.