Review
Critical practical aspects in the application of liquid chromatography–mass spectrometric studies for the characterization of impurities and degradation products

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2013.04.027Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Practical issues in application of multi-step strategy for the characterization of IMPs/DPs.

  • Practical aspects of sample preparation, method development and instrument settings.

  • Critical practical considerations in acquisition and interpretation of mass results.

  • Establishing fragmentation pathways of drug and IMPs/DPs from mass results and their comparison.

  • Confirmation of structures through mechanistic explanation.

Abstract

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) is considered today as a mainstay tool for the structure characterization of minor components like impurities (IMPs) and degradation products (DPs) in drug substances and products. A multi-step systematic strategy for the purpose involves high resolution mass and multi-stage mass studies on both the drug and IMPs/DPs, followed by comparison of their fragmentation profiles. Its successful application requires consideration of many practical aspects at each step. The same are critically discussed in this review.

Introduction

The definition of quality of pharmaceuticals has changed in recent times. From previous focus on purity, a greater emphasis is being paid today on impurities (IMPs), degradation products (DPs), etc. The characterization of such trace to minor analytes is not only important during drug and product development, but also from the perspective of regulatory approvals. Fortunately, the advent of a variety of sophisticated hyphenated techniques has made this task much simpler [1], against the time-consuming exercise involving isolation and enrichment of targeted compounds to milligram quantities, followed by acquisition of the spectral (mass, UV, NMR and IR) and elemental (CHN) data. In particular, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) is a technique of choice among all other hyphenated techniques due to its sensitivity and ease of use. Also, it carries potential in itself to provide unequivocal characterization of the structure of most trace to minor components, except enantiomers and epimers. A variety of LC–MS instruments are available today, which vary in (i) atmospheric pressure ionization (API) sources, like electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and/or atmospheric pressure photo ionization (APPI); and (ii) analyzers, like quadrupole, ion trap, time of flight (TOF), Orbitrap, etc. Usually ESI and APCI interfaces along with ion trap, TOF and Orbitrap analyzers are more useful for providing qualitative information on component structures.

The unequivocal structure elucidation of unknown analytes by LC–MS techniques is possible through the strategy put forth by us earlier [1], [2]. It entails the generation of molecular ion and fragment spectra of both the drug and its related substances; determination of their accurate and exact masses, elemental formula, ring plus double bonds and number of nitrogens; determination of the number of labile hydrogens through hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange mass studies; MSn study on molecular ions and fragments, and establishment of fragmentation pathways, followed by their comparison. Introductory details on each of these steps were provided by us in our previous publication [1]. The strategy has been duly validated in our laboratories and even by other researchers by application to the characterization of process impurities [3], drug degradation products [4], [5], [6], drug–drug interaction products [7], [8], drug-excipient interaction products [9], and metabolites of a variety of drugs [10], [11].

The purpose of this review is to critically address practical issues at each step of the proposed strategy meant to characterize IMPs/DPs by LC–MS tools. To our experience, straight forward characterization of IMPs/DPs is possible in most cases. However, challenges arise at times with respect to ionization of the analyte, achieving optimum signal sensitivity, problem in identification of the molecular ion, absence of characteristic fragment ions relative to the drug, appearance of unusual fragments, and difficulty in establishing fragmentation pathways. These aspects are duly discussed with examples.

Section snippets

Strategy for the characterization of impurities/degradation products by mass spectrometric approaches

The strategy for the characterization of IMPs/DPs by LC–MS, proposed by us earlier [1], [2], is shown in an expanded form in Fig. 1. While mass investigations on the drug are carried out in a direct infusion mode, parallel studies are conducted on IMPs/DPs after achieving their separation on a LC column. In the latter case, optimization of the mobile phase parameters to obtain resolution between the analytes with maximum mass sensitivity is an additional step. In both cases, it becomes prudent

Practical issues in sample preparation, method development and instrument settings

LC–MS tools are sophisticated and complex. Therefore, successful generation of data from them requires good knowledge and clarity on practical aspects. Critical practical issues and tips with respect to sample preparation, method development and instrument settings are discussed below.

Acquisition and analyses of mass spectra

Acquisition of mass data and analyses are subsequent critical aspects. They also have multiple practical intricacies.

Compilation of experimental and derived data

Systematic organization of the experimental data for the drug and its IMPs/DPs in a table format assists in easy interpretation and also comprehensive review. An example is given in Table 8.

Establishing fragmentation pathways

Once the whole data, like accurate mass, MSn, isotopic abundance and H/D exchange are collected immaculately by taking care of all the practical aspects, and also after data are organized systematically in the tabulated form, the next step is to lay down the fragmentation pathway of the drug and its IMPs/DPs. The successful construction of fragmentation pathways first for the drug and then for the postulated IMPs/DPs provides justification to the structures envisaged. There are many other

Comparison of fragmentation pathways of drug and impurities/degradation products

In a very simple case, the proposed structure of IMP/DP is easily substantiated if its spectrum shows similar fragmentation lines and same neutral losses as the drug. An example of this is shown in Fig. 22, which portrays fragmentation pathway of pioglitazone and it's DP. The ESI-MS/TOF fragmentation spectra of both the drug and its DP in positive ionization mode are shown in Fig. 23. As apparent from figure a, the drug (m/z 357) fragmented into a total of nine fragments. MS2 studies revealed

Confirmation of the proposed structures through mechanistic explanation

Once the structure is proposed through mass data and justified through mass fragmentation, the final structure shall be substantiated through mechanistic explanation. While proposing the mechanism, one must duly consider reaction/stress conditions under which specific IMP/DP was generated. Under these conditions, it should be possible to explain the formation of the specific IMP/DP mechanistically, normally through standard reaction mechanisms described in the literature [155], [156], [157]. In

Limitations of mass spectrometry for unequivocal characterization of unknown structures

Although mass spectrometry itself has potential to elucidate structure unequivocally, in rare situations it may be difficult to assign structures to unknown IMPs/DPs from the available mass data. This may be the case when multiple structures are proposed after critical review of the LC–MS data. We encountered a few situations of this type, for example, during characterization of a DP of ezetimibe, three alternate structures were possible, as given in Fig. 25. Mass data justified all the three

Conclusion

The above discussion clearly highlights that it is at every step of the use of mass tools that one needs to be careful of practical aspects involved in acquisition and interpretation of mass results for the purpose of characterization of IMPs/DPs. It is hoped that the discussion will help the new practitioners to achieve the task confidently. This may be true even of characterization of other minute components, like drug–drug interaction products, drug-excipient interaction products,

Acknowledgment

The grant of INSPIRE fellowship, by Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, to one of the authors (M.N.) is duly acknowledged.

References (160)

  • R. Kostiainen et al.

    Effect of eluent on the ionization process in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2009)
  • Y. Zhao et al.

    Simultaneous determination of ginkgo flavonoids and terpenoids in plasma: ammonium formate in LC mobile phase enhancing electrospray ionization efficiency and capacity

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2008)
  • L. Li et al.

    Simultaneous quantification of multiple licorice flavonoids in rat plasma

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2007)
  • F.E. Kuhlmann et al.

    Signal enhancement for gradient reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis with trifluoroacetic and other strong acid modifiers by postcolumn addition of propionic acid and isopropanol

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (1995)
  • S.Å. Gustavsson et al.

    Studies of signal suppression in liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using volatile ion-pairing reagents

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2001)
  • W.Z. Shou et al.

    Simple means to alleviate sensitivity loss by trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) mobile phases in the hydrophilic interaction chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometric (HILIC-ESI/MS/MS) bioanalysis of basic compounds

    J. Chromatogr. B

    (2005)
  • S. Gao et al.

    Sensitivity enhancement in liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry using derivatization and mobile phase additives

    J. Chromatogr. B: Anal. Tech. Biomed. Life Sci.

    (2005)
  • S. Zhou et al.

    Protonation in electrospray mass spectrometry: wrong-way-round or right-way-round?

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2000)
  • A. Schmidt et al.

    Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI?

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2003)
  • S. Caetano et al.

    Exploring and modelling the responses of electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization techniques based on molecular descriptors

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2005)
  • M.M. Siegel et al.

    Evaluation of a dual electrospray ionization/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization source at low flow rates (∼50 μl/min) for the analysis of both highly and weakly polar compounds

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (1998)
  • J.A. Syage et al.

    Atmospheric pressure photoionization: II. Dual source ionization

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2004)
  • B.O. Keller et al.

    Interferences and contaminants encountered in modern mass spectrometry

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2008)
  • K.K. Murray

    Glossary of terms for separations coupled to mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2010)
  • M.M. Kushnir et al.

    Assessing analytical specificity in quantitative analysis using tandem mass spectrometry

    Clin. Biochem.

    (2005)
  • M.J. Lopez de Alda et al.

    Liquid chromatography-(tandem) mass spectrometry of selected emerging pollutants (steroid sex hormones, drugs and alkylphenolic surfactants) in the aquatic environment

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2003)
  • M. Nobilis et al.

    Identification and determination of phase II nabumetone metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode array and mass spectrometric detection

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2004)
  • W. Ahrer et al.

    Determination of drug residues in water by the combination of liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis with electrospray mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2001)
  • R.F. Straub et al.

    Determination of penicillin G, ampicillin, amoxicillin, cloxacillin and cephapirin by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr.

    (1993)
  • X.-S. Miao et al.

    Determination of cholesterol-lowering statin drugs in aqueous samples using liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2003)
  • D.J. Harvey

    Fragmentation of negative ions from carbohydrates: part 1. Use of nitrate and other anionic adducts for the production of negative ion electrospray spectra from N-linked carbohydrates

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2005)
  • O. Lacina et al.

    Critical assessment of extraction methods for the simultaneous determination of pesticide residues and mycotoxins in fruits, cereals, spices and oil seeds employing ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2012)
  • X. Zhao et al.

    Identification of nitrate ester explosives by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2002)
  • J. Zhu et al.

    Ranking of gas-phase acidities and chloride affinities of monosaccharides and linkage specificity in collision-induced decompositions of negative ion electrospray-generated chloride adducts of oligosaccharides

    J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.

    (2001)
  • S. Mehta et al.

    Strategy for identification and characterization of small quantities of drug degradation products using LC and LC–MS: application to valsartan, a model drug

    Drug Test. Anal.

    (2010)
  • R.P. Shah et al.

    Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometric studies on atorvastatin and its stress degradation products

    Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.

    (2008)
  • Z. Kele et al.

    Electrospray mass spectrometry of phosphoramidites, a group of acid-labile compounds

    J. Mass Spectrom.

    (1999)
  • P.T. Szabó et al.

    Electrospray mass spectrometry of hydrophobic compounds using dimethyl sulfoxide and dimethylformamide as solvents

    Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.

    (2001)
  • J.J. Zhao et al.

    Effects of liquid chromatography mobile phase buffer contents on the ionization and fragmentation of analytes in liquid chromatographic/ionspray tandem mass spectrometric determination

    J. Mass Spectrom.

    (2002)
  • A.M. Kamel et al.

    Effects of mobile-phase additives, solution pH, ionization constant, and analyte concentration on the sensitivities and electrospray ionization mass spectra of nucleoside antiviral agents

    Anal. Chem.

    (1999)
  • Z. Wu et al.

    Favorable effects of weak acids on negative-ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

    Anal. Chem.

    (2004)
  • S. Zhou et al.

    Effects of solvent composition on molecular ion response in electrospray mass spectrometry: investigation of the ionization processes

    Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.

    (1995)
  • N.B. Cech et al.

    Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals

    Mass Spectrom. Rev.

    (2001)
  • L.M. Matz et al.

    Liquid-sheath-flow electrospray ionization feasibility study of direct water analysis with the use of high-resolution ion-mobility spectrometry

    Field Anal. Chem. Tech.

    (2001)
  • A.P. Bruins et al.

    Ion spray interface for combined liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry

    Anal. Chem.

    (1987)
  • M. Jemal et al.

    Effect of high performance liquid chromatography mobile phase (methanol versus acetonitrile) on the positive and negative ion electrospray response of a compound that contains both an unsaturated lactone and a methyl sulfone group

    Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.

    (1999)
  • R. Dams et al.

    Influence of the eluent composition on the ionization efficiency for morphine of pneumatically assisted electrospray, atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization and sonic spray

    Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.

    (2002)
  • B.A. Huffman et al.

    Effect of polar protic and polar aprotic solvents on negative-ion electrospray ionization and chromatographic separation of small acidic molecules

    Anal. Chem.

    (2012)
  • C.-C. Chan et al.

    Mitigation of signal suppression caused by the use of trifluoroacetic acid in liquid chromatography mobile phases during liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis via post-column addition of ammonium hydroxide

    Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.

    (2012)
  • B.A. Mansoori et al.

    ‘Wrong-way-round’ electrospray ionization of amino acids

    Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (80)

    • Structural characterization of novel hydrolytic and oxidative degradation products of acalabrutinib by LC-Q-TOF-MS, H/D exchange and NMR

      2022, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      The H/D exchange studies were carried out infusing D2O solvent in mobile phase after column through T union splitter. The purpose of this study was to confirm the presence of labile hydrogen in different structures [10]. All NMR experiments were recorded on Avance III HD 500 Bruker NMR spectrometer operating at 500 MHz using BBO and TXI probes with the standard pulse programs from the library.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally.

    2

    Present address: Biocon Bristol Myers-Squibb Research and Development Center (BBRC), Biocon Park, Bengaluru, India.

    View full text