Original ReportDiagnostic Performance of a Sonographic Volume and Solid Vascular Tissue Score (VSVTS) for Preoperative Risk Assessment of Pediatric and Adolescent Adnexal Masses
Introduction
The incidence of adnexal masses in girls and adolescents is approximately 2.6/100,000 girls per year.1 Up to 10-20% of surgically managed masses are malignant.2 Accurate preoperative risk assessment is critical, as it affects the surgical approach.3 For presumed benign masses that require intervention, a conservative approach with laparoscopic cystectomy is preferred. Malignancies, on the other hand, usually require an open laparotomy with oophorectomy, which has a consequent impact on patient fertility.2,3 Nonetheless, the optimal method for preoperative risk assessment in the pediatric and adolescent population remains elusive.
A previous retrospective study conducted at our institution showed that malignant masses can be preoperatively identified using a threshold of greater than 8 cm in size and presence of “complex” features by ultrasound. These criteria yielded a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% but a positive predictive value (PPV) of only 37.1%.3 Therefore, relying on such criteria alone would lead to a high proportion of undesirable oophorectomies for benign lesions.
Multiple more-complicated risk assessment algorithms have been studied in attempts to improve the preoperative PPV.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Most recently, we attempted replication of the Decision Tree System (DTS) proposed by Stankovic et al,4 which in their study demonstrated a preoperative NPV of 99% and PPV of 86%. The results of our replication attempt were less encouraging, as we achieved an NPV of 98% but a PPV of only 30% in our population.4
Concurrently, we hypothesized that a scoring system accounting for the vascularity of adnexal masses as has been introduced in adult algorithms, such as in the IOTA rules and O-RADS,11,12 might improve the PPV. These algorithms incorporate a subjective degree of vascularity in risk assessment, whereas in our experience any solid vascular tissue alone increases malignancy risk. The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a preoperative sonographic adnexal mass scoring system based on mass volume and amount of solid vascular tissue in the pediatric and adolescent population.
Section snippets
Patient Population
This is a retrospective study of all female individuals 1-18 years of age presenting with an adnexal mass to The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) between April 2011 and March 2016 and was conducted with approval of our institutional Research Ethics Board. Patients who did not receive surgical management or preoperative ultrasound that included spectral Doppler were excluded. The inclusion dates mirror a similar cohort used in previous risk stratification studies from our
Results
In total, 169 patients with 179 masses with surgical management of adnexal masses were identified, with 10.6% of the lesions being malignant. The mean age of the study population was 13.0 ± 3.4 years. 73.7% of the study population was postmenarchal. All pathologic diagnoses are listed in Table 2.
The distribution of pathologic entities per VSVTS is depicted in Table 3. The distribution of pathologic entities per volume score and solid vascular tissue score is available in Supplemental Table 1.
Discussion
In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of a sonographic volume and solid vascular tissue score for preoperative risk stratification of adnexal masses in the pediatric and adolescent population. The major finding of our study is that the addition of a solid vascular tissue score to preoperative assessment shows incremental benefit to PPV and LR + while maintaining reasonable NPV and LR–for prediction of malignancy in pediatric and adolescent adnexal masses.
Multiple
Conclusion
A sonographic scoring system based on the volume and presence of solid vascular tissue improved PPV for preoperative risk stratification of adnexal masses in the pediatric and adolescent population compared to existing ultrasound-only approaches. Further prospective research is needed to determine how best to incorporate components of such scoring systems into clinical management algorithms.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the Ontasian Imaging Lab (OIL).
References (16)
- et al.
Characteristics and management of adnexal masses in a Canadian pediatric and adolescent population
J Obstet Gynaecol Can
(2011) - et al.
A Preoperative scoring system for adnexal mass in children and adolescents to preserve their future fertility
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol
(2019) - et al.
Preoperative risk stratification of adnexal masses: can we predict the optimal surgical management?
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol
(2014) - et al.
Preoperative risk stratification of adnexal masses in the pediatric and adolescent population: evaluating the Decision Tree System
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol
(2019) - et al.
Ovarian preservation from tumors and torsions in girls: prospective diagnostic study
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol
(2017) - et al.
Preoperative differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors: the efficacy of morphology indexing and Doppler flow sonography
Gynecologic Oncology
(2003) - et al.
Preoperative risk stratification of children with ovarian tumors
J Pediatr Surg
(2016) - et al.
Ovarian lesions volumes as a screening tool for malignancy in adolescent ovarian tumors
J Pediatr Surg
(2015)
Cited by (1)
Common pediatric gynecological issues: a review
2021, Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
None of the authors have any conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
The authors report no funding for this work.