Transition metal catalyzed cross-coupling of aryl Grignard reagents with aryl fluorides via Pd- or Ni-activation of the C–F bond: an efficient synthesis of unsymmetrical biaryls – application of microwave technology in ligand and catalyst screening

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2004.10.037Get rights and content

Abstract

Biaryl compounds are prevalent in both nature and in active pharmaceutical ingredients. The palladium and nickel catalyzed cross-coupling of aryl Grignard reagents with aryl fluorides reported herein affords moderate to excellent yields of the corresponding unsymmetrical biaryls. In addition, the first example of a biaryl cross-coupling utilizing unactivated aryl fluorides under phosphine free palladium conditions is reported. Microwave technology allowed rapid optimization of catalyst systems, which identified several ligands for this cross-coupling reaction.

Graphical abstract

Biaryl compounds are prevalent in both nature and in active pharmaceutical ingredients. The palladium and nickel catalyzed cross-coupling of aryl Grignard reagents with aryl fluorides reported herein affords moderate to excellent yields of the corresponding unsymmetrical biaryls. In addition, the first example of a biaryl cross-coupling utilizing unactivated aryl fluorides under phosphine free palladium conditions is reported. Microwave technology allowed rapid optimization of catalyst systems, which identified several ligands for this cross-coupling reaction.

  1. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Unsymmetrical biaryls represent an important class of compounds in drug discovery [1] natural product [2], and material science [3]. These biaryls have been typically prepared via cross-coupling of aryl metal compounds with aryl halides (aryl iodides, bromides, and chlorides) mediated by transition metal catalysts [4]. Efforts have been made to expand the synthetic scope of these coupling reactions to include aryl electrophiles such as benzonitriles [5], anisoles [6], and aryl carbamates [7], which were previously regarded as unreactive in these transition-metal cross-coupling procedures. Within the aryl halide series of compounds, aryl fluorides have been known to be the least reactive toward standard cross-coupling protocols [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Indeed, activation of a C–F bond is an extremely challenging process due to the inherent strength of this bond [8]. Kumada and co-workers [9] demonstrated for the first time a C–F activation process involving the reaction of fluorobenzene and i-PrMgCl mediated by NiCl2(dmpe)2. In a significant extension of this initial report, Herrmann and co-workers [10] expanded the use of aryl fluorides as synthetically useful substrates in these couplings by the application of N-heterocyclic carbenes as ligands in a nickel catalyzed cross-coupling with aryl Grignard reagents. Most recently, Mongin et al. [11]. has reported the C–F activation chemistry of fluoroazine and diazine compounds using NiCl2L2 (L = dppe, dppp, and dppf) as the catalyst precursor. In the palladium catalysis arena, there have been several reports describing both the Suzuki and Stille biaryl cross-coupling protocols of highly activated substrates such as substituted fluoronitrobenzene derivatives and (fluoroarene) tricarbonylchromium(0) complexes [13]. However, mechanistically these cross-coupling reactions utilizing activated substrates probably proceed via an SNAr type oxidative addition process.

Herein, our results concerning the application of both nickel and palladium mediated Kumada–Corriu coupling reactions of unactivated aryl fluorides is reported.

Section snippets

Ligand screening

A key to the development of this aryl fluoride cross-coupling chemistry was the use of microwave conditions to rapidly screen ligands and catalysts [14]. Utilization of microwave screening allows for a rational high throughput screening (HTS) protocol thus minimizing the number of experiments that need to be carried out (thereby distinguishing this technique from classical HTS). This allowed the rapid identification of several ligands that are active in both the nickel and palladium

Experimental

All compounds listed in this paper are known in the chemical literature. All reaction mixtures were identified by GC/MS and compared to authentic materials where possible. The yields, reported in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, are GC yields based on tridecane as an internal standard.

Thermal Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling (Table 1, entry 7): In a reaction flask was placed Ni(acac)2 (15.6 mg, 0.0607 mmol), tris(2,4-di-t-butylphosphite) (39.3 mg, 0.0607 mmol), tridecane (104.8 mg, 0.568 mmol, as an

Acknowledgements

The author thank Dr. J.A. Miller (DSM Pharmaceutical Chemicals) and Professor B.M. Trost (Stanford University) for helpful discussions concerning this work.

References (15)

  • E. Wenkert et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1979)
    E. Wenkert et al.

    J. Org. Chem.

    (1984)
    J.W. Dankwardt

    Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.

    (2004)
  • M. Hudlicky

    Chemistry of Organic Fluorine Compounds

    (1992)
  • Y.M. Kim et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2003)
    D.A. Widdowson et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2003)
    D.A. Widdowson et al.

    J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I

    (2000)
    M. Jakt et al.

    J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.

    (2002)
    T. Braun et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2001)
  • M. Larhed et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2002)
  • P.J. Hajduk et al.

    J. Med. Chem.

    (2000)
  • G. Bringmann et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2001)
  • T. Yamamoto

    Synlett

    (2003)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

1

New address: TransTech Pharma, 4170 Mendenhall Oaks Pkwy, Suite 110, High Point, NC 27265 USA.

View full text