Craniomaxillofacial deformities/cosmetic surgeryRisk Factors for Neurosensory Disturbance After Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Based on Position of Mandibular Canal and Morphology of Mandibular Angle
Section snippets
Patients and Methods
The institutional ethics committee of Kyushu Dental College approved the present retrospective study. The study subjects were 30 skeletal Class III patients (9 males and 21 females), with a mean age of 22.0 years (range, 16-39 years). All patients underwent BSSO for mandibular setback at the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery at Kyushu Dental College (Kitakyushu, Japan) and had the same sequence of preoperative radiographic and clinical examinations, treatment planning,
Results
The median bone marrow space was 1.96 mm (range, 0-4.5 mm), and the median length of the mandibular angle was 30.9 mm (range, 23-37 mm).
Neurosensory disturbance was seen on 15 sides (25.0%) at 1 month postoperatively, 9 sides (15.0%) at 3 months postoperatively, and 7 sides (11.7%) at 6 months postoperatively (Fig 3). The frequency of NSD decreased with an increasing bone marrow space. Neurosensory disturbance at 1 month postoperatively was observed in 8 (57.1%) of 14 in group I, 5 (25.0%) of
Discussion
Neurosensory disturbance remains 1 of the major complications of BSSO. Previous studies have revealed that the risk factors include neurosensory damage, compression or decompression injuries during medial periosteal dissection, fixation methods, postoperative swelling or bleeding, patient age, the osteotomy line, and the direction of mandibular movement.5, 8, 9, 10 Neurosensory disturbance arising from the splitting procedure can directly interfere with function; thus, it is important to
References (20)
Experience with the sagittal split osteotomy of mandibular ramus: A 13 year review
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1981)- et al.
Neurosensory disturbance after sagittal split and intraoral vertical osteotomy: As reported in questionnaires and patients' records
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2005) - et al.
Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2000) Position of the mandibular canal
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1987)- et al.
Relationship of the mandibular canal to the lateral cortex of the mandibular ramus as a factor in the development of neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2002) - et al.
Computed tomographic analysis of the position and course of the mandibular canal: Relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2005) - et al.
Neurosensory differences after wire and rigid fixation in patients with mandibular advancement
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2000) - et al.
Trigemial nerve hypesthesia after sagittal split osteotomy in setback cases: Correlation of postoperative computed tomography and long-term trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2003) - et al.
Cross-sectional tomography in evaluation of patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy
J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(1992) - et al.
Recovery of nerve injury after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy: Diagnostic value of clinical and electrophysiologic tests in the follow-up
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
(2004)
Cited by (60)
Risk factors of neurosensory disturbances at 1 year postoperatively after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy
2022, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral RadiologyBone marrow space volume of the mandible influencing intraoperative blood loss in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: A pilot Study
2022, Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryCitation Excerpt :BSSO involves separating buccal cortical bone from inner cancellous bone, exposing the bone marrow space of the mandible. A previous report mentioned that a smaller bone marrow space was associated with a greater risk of neurosensory disturbance after BSSO [6]. However, whether the bone marrow space volume of the mandible affects blood loss during BSSO remains unclear.
Radiologic Risk Factors for Persistent Mandibular Nerve Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy
2022, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryPosition of the mandibular canal before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a cone beam computed tomographic study
2022, British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryPOST-SURGICAL NEUROSENSORY DYSFUNCTION OF INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE IN BILATERAL SAGITTAL SPILT OSTEOTOMY OF THE MANDIBLE USING SAW VERSUS PIEZOTOME: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
2022, Journal of Evidence-Based Dental PracticeCitation Excerpt :The incidence of transection is reported in 2% to 3.5% of the operated patients.3 IAN NSD has been reported to occur in 25% to 98% of the patients immediately or up to one month after BSSO4-7 and in 11.7% to 85% of the injured patients, 6 months post-operatively.3,5-8 Long-term neurologic deficit occurs in 10% to 30% of the affected patients, whether annoyed or not.3
Computed tomography assessment of mandibular morphologic changes and the inferior mandibular border defect after sagittal split ramus osteotomy
2021, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology