ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Volume 14, Issue 5, May 2007, Pages 464-467
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (112 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2006.03.019    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Laboratory study

The effect of caffeine on dilated cerebral circulation and on diagnostic CO2 reactivity testing

Martin Blahaa, b, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Vladimir Benesb, Colleen M. Douvillea, c and David W. Newella, c

aDepartment of Neurological Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States bNeurosurgery Department, Central Military Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic cSeattle Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center/Providence Campus, Seattle, Washington, United States

Received 21 January 2006; 
accepted 7 March 2006. 
Available online 7 March 2007.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Reduction of cerebral blood flow by caffeine has been shown in multiple studies. However, the effect of this substance on pathologically dilated cerebral vessels is not clearly defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of caffeine on an already dilated cerebral circulation and specify if these vessels are still able to constrict as a consequence of caffeine stimulation. A second aim of this study was to compare results of cerebral vasomotor CO2 reactivity testing with and without caffeine ingestion. Seventeen healthy adult volunteers had vasomotor reactivity tested before and thirty minutes after ingestion of 300 mg of caffeine. Each vasomotor reactivity test consisted of velocity measurements from both middle cerebral arteries using transcranial Doppler ultrasound during normocapnia, hypercapnia, and hypocapnia. Hemodynamic data and end-tidal CO2 (etCO2) concentration were also recorded. The vasomotor reactivity (VMR) and CO2 reactivity were calculated from a measured data pool. At a level of etCO2 = 40 mmHg the resting velocity in the middle cerebral artery (VMCA) dropped from 70.7 ± 22.8 cm/sec to 60.7 ± 15.4 cm/sec 30 minutes after caffeine stimulation (14.1% decrease, p < 0.001). During hypercapnia of etCO2 = 50 mmHg there was also a significant decline of VMCA from 103.1 ± 25.4 to 91.4 ± 21.8 cm/sec (11.3%, p < 0.001). There was not a statistically significant reduction of VMCA during hypocapnia. Calculated VMR and CO2 reactivity before and after caffeine intake were not statistically significant. The presented data demonstrate a significant decrease in cerebral blood flow velocities after caffeine ingestion both in a normal cerebrovascular bed and under conditions of peripheral cerebrovascular vasodilatation. These findings support the important role of caffeine in regulation of CBF under different pathological conditions. Despite significant reactive vasodilatation in the brain microcirculation, caffeine is still able to act as a competitive antagonist of CO2 on cerebral microvessels. The fact that caffeine may decrease CBF despite significant pathological vasodilatation offers the possibility of therapeutic manipulation in patients with traumatic vasoparalysis. For routine clinical testing of CO2 reactivity it is not necessary to insist on pre-test dietary restrictions.

Keywords: Caffeine; Cerebral blood flow; Hypercapnia; Transcranial Doppler ultrasound; Vasomotor reactivity

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Subjects and methods
2.1. Subjects
2.2. Hemodynamics measurement
2.3. CO2 challenge
2.4. Testing protocol
2.5. Statistical analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
References

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.