doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.073
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
HMGB Binding to DNA: Single and Double Box Motifs
Micah J. McCauley1, Jeff Zimmerman2, L. James Maher III2 and Mark C. Williams1,
, 
1Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Received 16 July 2007;
revised 17 September 2007;
accepted 22 September 2007.
Edited by D. E. Draper.
Available online 1 October 2007.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Abstract
High mobility group (HMG) proteins are nuclear proteins believed to significantly affect DNA interactions by altering nucleic acid flexibility. Group B (HMGB) proteins contain HMG box domains known to bind to the DNA minor groove without sequence specificity, slightly intercalating base pairs and inducing a strong bend in the DNA helical axis. A dual-beam optical tweezers system is used to extend double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in the absence as well as presence of a single box derivative of human HMGB2 [HMGB2(box A)] and a double box derivative of rat HMGB1 [HMGB1(box A+box B)]. The single box domain is observed to reduce the persistence length of the double helix, generating sharp DNA bends with an average bending angle of 99 ± 9° and, at very high concentrations, stabilizing dsDNA against denaturation. The double box protein contains two consecutive HMG box domains joined by a flexible tether. This protein also reduces the DNA persistence length, induces an average bending angle of 77 ± 7°, and stabilizes dsDNA at significantly lower concentrations. These results suggest that single and double box proteins increase DNA flexibility and stability, albeit both effects are achieved at much lower protein concentrations for the double box. In addition, at low concentrations, the single box protein can alter DNA flexibility without stabilizing dsDNA, whereas stabilization at higher concentrations is likely achieved through a cooperative binding mode.
Keywords: single molecule; single box motif; double box motif; bending angle; DNA stretching
Abbreviations: dsDNA, double-stranded DNA; HMG, high mobility group; HMGB, high mobility group B; ssDNA, single-stranded DNA; WLC, worm-like chain
 |
Fig. 1. Structures of HMGB proteins bound to dsDNA. (a) Single HMG box (purple) bound to dsDNA (green and yellow) in this crystal structure for HMGB family member HMG-D protein from D. melanogaster.21 The non-sequence-specific binding is characterized by van der Waals contacts, direct and water-mediated hydrogen bonding, and partial intercalation, yielding a strong and continuous deformation of the DNA backbone. (b) Structure of tandem HMG boxes from an artificial HMGB protein created with transcription factor SRY in place of box A of HMGB1.24 This artificial tandem SRY/B box protein (red/blue) binds to a 16-bp sequence of dsDNA with each HMG box engaging DNA similarly, although the SRY box is sequence specific (allowing determination of this nuclear magnetic resonance structure). The domains are connected by a basic sequence that is believed to be flexible. (c) Rotated view of the structure from (b) revealing that each HMG box domain induces an independent DNA bend, with the bend partially reinforcing. The planes of the first and last base pairs in (a) and (c) are perpendicular to the paper. Dotted green arrows indicate the direction of the helical axis, and the deflection of the outgoing arrows gives the protein-induced bending angle. Images were generated using coordinates from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Protein Data Bank (entries 1QRV and 2GZK) with Swiss View/DeepView v3.7 software.
Fig. 2. HMGB proteins lower the persistence length of dsDNA. (a) Averaged stretching (solid) and relaxation (open) data for dsDNA in the absence (blue circles) or presence (green boxes) of 3 nM HMGB1(box A+box B) in 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.5) and 100 nM Na+. Solid and dotted lines are averages for the extension and relaxation data, respectively. Each line is the average of four data sets, collected at 100-nm intervals, and each point averaged for 1.0 s. (b) Averaged stretching/relaxation data shown separately, revealing minimal hysteresis. Standard uncertainty in each point is 1 pN or less, within the size of each symbol. (c) Levenberg–Marquardt fits (solid lines) to the force extension data according to the WLC model, as described in the text. The fits yielded bds = 0.339 ± 0.001 nm/bp, Kds = 1200 ± 100 pN, and Pds = 46 ± 2 nm for dsDNA as well as bds = 0.339 ± 0.003 nm/bp, Kds = 939 ± 100 pN, and Pds = 22 ± 2 nm for dsDNA with 3 nM HMGB1(box A+box B). Fits are limited to data below 45 pN.
Fig. 3. Binding isotherms for the change in DNA persistence length (Pds) as a function of HMGB protein concentration (c). Each data point corresponds to the average of three to four extension curves, as shown in Fig. 2, which are fit to the WLC model to obtain Pds. With increasing protein concentration, both the single box HMGB2(box A) (blue boxes) and the double box HMGB1(box A+box B) (green circles) proteins substantially reduce the persistence length of dsDNA. The double box HMGB1(box A+box B) protein shows a stronger equilibrium association constant per ligand (K). The solid lines are fits to the binding isotherms described in the text, yielding K = 0.11 ± 0.05 × 109 M−1 for HMGB2(box A) and K = 11 ± 3 × 109 M−1 for HMGB1(box A+box B).
Fig. 4. HMGB1(boxes A+B) protein stabilizes the DNA melting transition. (a) Full stretching (solid) and relaxation (dotted) cycles for HMGB1(boxes A+B) bound to DNA. In addition to the change in the persistence length discussed earlier the melting transition is stabilized by the addition of 2 nM (blue), 4 nM (green), 10 nM (gold), and 100 nM (red) of protein. Furthermore, there are an increase in the slope of the melting transition and an increase in the hysteresis evident upon relaxation. (b) Enlargement of the melting transition shown in (a). (c) Stretching and relaxation cycles for the single box HMGB2(box A) show little change from bare DNA (black) through 2 nM (blue) and 4 nM (green) of protein. At and above 10 nM of protein concentration (gold and red), DNA stabilization becomes evident due to cooperative binding to dsDNA. (d) Enlargement of the melting transition shown in (c).
 |
Fig. 5. Binding isotherms for the change in DNA melting force (ΔFm) as a function of the concentration (c) of added HMGB protein and ions. Solid data points and lines are for DNA–protein complexes in 100 mM Na+, whereas open data points and dotted lines are for binding in 50 mM Na+. Each point represents an average over 4–10 extension cycles. (a) Over relatively low concentrations (<10 nM protein), there is little change in the melting force for dsDNA bound to HMGB2(box A), whereas HMGB1(box A+box B) strongly stabilizes the nucleic acid. (b) At higher concentrations, stabilization is evident for the single box domain due to cooperative binding to DNA. Although the cooperative binding of HMGB2(box A) appears to be unaffected by salt concentrations over this range, the binding of HMGB1(box A+box B) is strongly enhanced in low salt concentrations, due possibly to an increase in cooperativity. In 100 mM Na+, the fits to binding models determine K = 0.028 ± 0.010 × 109 M−1 for HMGB2(box A) and K = 13 ± 3 × 109 M−1 for HMGB1(box A+box B), whereas in 50 mM Na+, K = 0.014 ± 0.006 × 109 M−1 for HMGB2(box A) and K = 7 ± 2 × 109 M−1 for HMGB1(box A+box B).
Fig. 6. Stretching curves for dsDNA. (a) Force extension (filled blue) and relaxation (open blue) curves for dsDNA in 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), including 100 mM Na+. Low forces reveal an entropic spring regime, whereas the extension at higher forces is described enthalpically, as the chain stretches and unwinds. At
62 pN, dsDNA abruptly lengthens, as base pairs cooperatively melt and base stacking is disrupted. Relaxing the nucleic acid allows reannealing, whereas continuing to higher forces extends the predominantly single-stranded construct, until strand separation is reached (green and red). Solid lines are models of polymer elasticity described in the text, and the area between them determines the free energy of melting. (b) Trapping multiple strands of labeled dsDNA reveals melting plateaus at integer multiples of the dsDNA melting force and confirms the linearity of the force measurement. This dual-beam instrument can examine trapping forces up to
325 pN.
Table 1.
Binding parameters for HMGB1(box A+box B) and HMGB2(box A) to dsDNA
a Values for
n are held fixed during the fits with the use of literature values and estimates determined from structures.
.[21], [23] and [24]b Determined using the data shown in
Fig. 3 and persistence length change as described by Eqs.
(2),
(3) and
(4).
c Determined using the data shown in
Fig. 5 and melting force change as described by Eqs.
(2) and
(5).