Experimental validation of finite element codes for welding deformations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.014Get rights and content

Abstract

A single pass metal inert gas welding on an austenitic steel plate has been presented for the purpose of providing controlled experimental data against which numerical codes quantifying welding stresses can be validated. It includes a moving heat source with material deposit, and completes thus existing validation data. The experiment has been addressed by a numerical code, WeldSimS, reproducing qualitatively the distortion during welding quite well. Quantitative differences between the numerical and experimental results, however, indicate the need for more accurate modelling tools than those presently available, which are all based on commonly accepted modelling principles and input data.

Introduction

During welding of e.g. steel, the heat source leads to rapid heating and melting of the material and the formation of a weld pool that subsequently cools and solidifies. Welding stresses arise due to the inhomogeneous cooling, and in steel these stresses are caused by the effects of non-uniformly distributed cooling contractions and, in ferritic steels, solid state phase transformations. Modelling of the welding stresses and associated deformations requires, therefore, a numerical code able to predict both the thermometallurgical and the mechanical development during the process. Ideally, a numerical code should account for a series of complex phenomena such as the material deposition, weld arc heat input, melting and solidification, solid-state phase transformations, work hardening, strain rate sensitivity, and the flow stress dependency on the specific mixture of phases appearing at the different temperatures. Welding in general includes several mechanical phenomena such as transverse, longitudinal, and angular shrinkage, as well as bending distortion (Pilipenko, 2001, chap. 2.2).

However, due to this complexity, as well as the need for minimising the computation time, simplified models are often applied (Taljat et al., 1998, Ferro et al., 2006, Brown et al., 2006, Dean and Hidekazu, 2006). This means that the codes should be carefully validated against controlled experiments before being used to predict welding stresses in real industrial situations. Such validation experiments have been carried out in the present study. The study also addresses the presented validation experiment numerically, investigating the validity of the numerical code WeldSimS (Fjær et al., 2006) implemented in FORTRAN90 by the Institute for Energy Technology.

Validation cases have previously been published, e.g. by Volden (1998) presenting a Satoh, 1972b, Satoh, 1972a experiment, Taljat et al. (1998) who presented welding of a disc, Roux and Billardon (2006) who presented a “multipass” welding of a disc, and Vincent et al., 1999, Vincent et al., 2005, Bergheau et al., 2004 and Depradeux and Jullien, 2004a, Depradeux and Jullien, 2004b at INSA-Lyon who also presented a Satoh experiment and a disc experiment in addition to a single pass tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding. These validation cases include one-, two- and three-dimensional cases represented by the Satoh test, a disc case, and a plate experiment, respectively. They do, however, not include material deposit.

The experiment of the present study is a single pass metal inert gas (MIG) welding on an austenitic steel plate, carried out at the CEMEF1 research centre. By involving material deposit and a moving heat source, our experiment complements the validation cases referred to above. The objectives of the present paper is firstly to present a validation experiment that completes existing work. Secondly, the present study addresses the lack of accuracy in commonly used modelling equations used in welding simulations.

Section 2 of the paper presents the welding case and the experimental details along with the experimental results. The numerical code including the modelling equations and implementation is summarized in Section 3. The modelling results are presented and compared to the experimental results in Section 4.

Section snippets

The welding case

Fig. 1 shows the experimental setup including the torch and the sample positioned as when ready to be welded. The thick plate used in the experiment is furthermore shown in Fig. 2. It is 136 mm wide, 10.5 mm thick, and 250 mm long in the welding direction. The geometry was chosen small enough to preform 3D modelling with limited calculation time, but still large enough in the welding direction to obtain a thermal quasi-stationary situation. The weld line is marked in Fig. 2 with dashed line, and

Governing equations

Neglecting mechanical dissipation and assuming thermal equilibrium at the microscopic scale, the transient heat transfer is governed by (Haug and Langtangen, 1997):ρcpT˙+ρg˙liqΔH=(λT)where ρ, cp, λ, T, ΔH, and gliq denote the density, specific heat capacity, thermal conductivity, temperature, latent heat of fusion, and the liquid fraction, respectively. Thermal boundary conditions Mortensen, 1999, Carslaw and Jaeger, 1959 include both convection from Fourier’s law and radiation from

Modelling results and comparison to the experiment

The temperature development obtained by WeldSimS and the experimental results from Test 3 are shown in Fig. 16. The figure shows that the heating rate, heating time, and cooling rate obtained by the numerical codes coincide with the experimental results. However, it is clear that the models overshoot the experimentally measured peak temperature. We believe one of the reasons for this discrepancy is the fact that the temperature was not measured at the very tip of the applied 1 mm insulated

Conclusions

A single pass metal inert gas welding on an austenitic steel plate, which includes material deposit and a moving heat source, has been presented for the purpose of providing controlled experimental data against which numerical codes quantifying welding stresses can be validated. Some experimental problems, especially the need for more accurate temperature measurements, have been discussed. Improved temperature measurements could in future experiments be addressed by use of thermocouples without

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their thanks to Professor Mohammed M’Hamdi, SINTEF and Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway for contribution of relevant input and suggestions. The funding from the research Council of Norway through the “STORFORSK” Project No. 167397/V30 is greatly acknowledged.

References (32)

  • L. Depradeux et al.

    Experimental and numerical simulation of thermomechanical phenomena during a tig welding process

    Journal De Physique IV

    (2004)
  • P. Ferro et al.

    The influence of phase transformations on residual stress induced by the welding process—3D and 2D numerical models

    Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering

    (2006)
  • H. Fjær et al.

    Alspen—a mathematical model for thermal stresses in direct chill casting of aluminium billets

    Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B

    (1990)
  • H.G. Fjær et al.

    On the use of residual stress from welding simulations in failure assessment analyses for steel structures

  • J. Goldak et al.

    Computational Welding Mechanics

    (2005)
  • J. Goldak et al.

    Computer modeling of heat flow in welds

    Metallurgical Transactions B

    (1986)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Residual Stress and Distortion Modeling of Electron Beam Direct Manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V

      2018, Thermo-Mechanical Modeling of Additive Manufacturing
    • Residual Stress and Distortion Modeling of Electron Beam Direct Manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V

      2017, Thermo-Mechanical Modeling of Additive Manufacturing
    • A simplified elliptic paraboloid heat source model for autogenous GTAW process

      2016, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, in order to simulate deep penetration welding processes like Laser Beam Welding (LBW) and Electron Beam Welding (EBW) the combination of double ellipsoidal and conical heat source models has been used [44]. The conical heat source has a Gaussian distribution of the power in the radial direction [21–45]. The conical source geometry represents an alternative to model the keyhole effect in the weldpool of the LBW and the characteristic “reversed bugle” configuration of the weld cross-section (Fig. 1a).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text