Elsevier

Journal of Luminescence

Volume 225, September 2020, 117369
Journal of Luminescence

Judd-Ofelt modelling of the dual-excited single band ratiometric luminescence thermometry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117369Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Luminescence Intensity Ratio parameters are predicted from room temperature spectrum.

  • Judd-Ofelt model works for the double-excitation LIR thermometry.

  • Correction factors are needed, in contrast to Judd-Ofelt thermometric model for emissions.

  • Testing on Lu2O3:Eu3+ gave 99.9% match between the fitted and modeled temperature invariant.

  • Predicted absolute sensitivity is almost equal to the experimentally obtained values.

Abstract

The Judd-Ofelt model, already verified for the luminescence intensity ratio (also called fluorescence intensity ratio, FIR) thermometry from the emission spectra, is modified and tested for the dual-excited single band luminescence thermometry. The adapted model has been tested on Lu2O3:Eu3+, with a 99.9% match of the temperature invariant parameter to the experimental value. The absolute sensitivity obtained experimentally and predicted by the model are almost indistinguishable. The model is proven to be adequate for inaugural phosphor quality evaluation, as it can reveal the approximate figures of merit of luminescence thermometry solely from the single emission spectrum.

Graphical abstract

Image 1
  1. Download : Download high-res image (358KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Experimental LIR data and theoretical fit to an equation with an offset added to the Boltzmann distribution.

Introduction

Both non-contact temperature measuring devices by the luminescent probes and the number of research papers on such sensors have seen an exponential growth in the last decades (as similarly reported in Ref. [22]; see Fig. 1). Their recent popularity is no surprise, as the new technological advancement enables for their successful adoption by the industry, which has long desired for the non-contact sensors that are mechanically, thermally and chemically stable, can be used in harsh environments or in high electromagnetic fields, cause no interference, no perturbation to the measurand, and have reliable and self-referencing read-out [1]. Luminescent sensors can be incorporated within or at the tip of the fiber-optic cable [2], placed as coatings on any surface [3], or exist as the nanomaterials [4], to be used for biomedical purposes [5], etc. Thus, there is a growing need not only for investigation of the new materials, but the new read-out methods and their theoretical interpretation.

Currently, the most employed method for temperature read-out from the luminescent sensors is the Luminescence Intensity Ratio (LIR), which exploits the different temperature dependence of two emission peaks [6]. This definition of LIR has been recently expanded to the LIR of excitation peaks, by monitoring the intensity of the single emission peak created by two different excitations. As this is the recent method, it is explored in a scanty number of articles [7,8]. However, the method shows an outstanding potential as it allows for the cheapest read-out devices possible for luminescent sensing. An example of the fiber-optic temperature probe that uses this excitation LIR is given in Fig. 2. The two excitation beams from LEDs or lasers are transmitted to the tip by the fiber-optic cable. The excitation pulses are sequential. Due to the luminescence, the signal travels back from the tip through the cable. At the end of the cable, a filter is placed in order to eliminate any reflectance. Thus, only the luminescence is detected by the detector. The detector records the pulsating signal, with differences in amplitude depending upon the temperature, i.e. LIR can be defined. This method is simpler and cheaper even than the LIR of emissions, as only a single detector is needed and just one filter, at only a higher expense of employing the second light source.

At 0 K only the 4f ground state of trivalent lanthanide is populated by the N optical centres. As the temperature rises, thermal energy populates the higher levels, and the initial N centres get shared among the levels depending on their distance from the ground state, redistributed according to the Boltzmann distribution. The fractional thermal population of the level A, from which the absorption originates is then given by Ref. [9]:XA(T)=NAN=gAexp(EA/kT)igiexp(Ei/kT)where g = 2J + 1 is the level degeneracy. In the case of the Eu3+, the temperature dependent optical centre relative populations are presented in Fig. 3.

Thus, the excitation to the higher excited levels can be executed on the higher levels of the ground multiplet for temperatures above 0 K, i.e., in the case of Eu3+, this would mean the possibility of the excitation of 5D0 and higher levels from any of the 7FJ levels. This fact was exploited by monitoring the 5D07F4 emission and using the luminescence intensity ratio (LIR) of the 5D07F0,2 excitations [7]. However, with 5D07F0 any theoretical analysis is arduous as the only analytical tool for the rare-earth spectroscopy [10], Judd-Ofelt (JO) analysis, is not possible for that transition. In contrast, 5D07F1­­ is a magnetic-dipole transition and is thus allowed for an 4f-4f transition by conventional quantum mechanics, while 5D07F2 induced-electric dipole transition is JO allowed. Thus, the LIR can be theoretically explained by the JO if those transitions are used, in the analogous manner to the JO thermometric model presented in our previous work [11]. Although 7F0 is more populated than 7F1,2 up to 496 K, the efficiency for populating the 5D0 level are lower via the former. Thus, the excitation via the 7F1,2 transitions is more efficient even at the room temperature. Secondly, the probability for the transition is proportional to the JO parameters [12]. As 5D07F2 transition's oscillator strength is proportional to the Ω2 parameter [9], for efficient population of the 5D0 level it is desirable that the Ω2 is large for Eu3+ in a given host. Sesquioxides are known to be an excellent hosts for RE3+, and doped by Eu3+ they produce an intense 5D07F2 emission [13]. Thus, for the testing of the LIR thermometry by two excitations and validation of the modified JO thermometric model for this application (originally presented in Ref. [11] for two-emission LIR), the Lu2O3 host matrix was chosen. The model should allow for the prediction of the temperature invariant LIR parameter, which is conventionally obtained by fitting to the experimental data. The thermometric figure of merit, the absolute sensitivity, is to be compared to the absolute sensitivity predicted by this model. The success of the model would allow for the primal selection of a sensor material based solely on the single emission spectrum obtained at the room temperature, saving researcher's time and resources in comparison to the conventional thermometric process.

Section snippets

Experimental

The sample of 0.5 mol% Eu3+-doped Lu2O3 was synthesized using the polymer complex solution (PCS) method. Firstly, water solution of stoichiometric quantities of rare-earth (RE) nitrates was prepared by dissolving appropriate quantities of RE oxides in hot nitric acid. Polyethylenglycol (PEG, molecular weight 200) was added to the prepared RE-nitrates solutions in 1:1 mass ratio and after stirring at 80 °C for a few hours, metal-PEG solid complex was formed. Subsequently, the complex was

Results

The structure of prepared Eu3+ activated Lutetium oxide (Lu2O3) powders is confirmed by XRD (see Fig. 4) [14]; neither other phase peaks nor traces of impurities were detected. Fig. 5presents the strategy for dual-excitation LIR. The Eu3+ is excited into thermally populated 7F1,2 levels (sequentially), while the 5D07F4 emission intensity is observed (Fig. 5a). The trend of ratio of emissions excited by 7F1,2 levels depends on the temperature according to the Boltzmann distribution. Thus, LIR

Conclusion

The temperature invariant B parameter for LIR by two-excitation thermometry can be predicted with the JO thermometric model from the single spectra at room temperature by calculating the JO parameters and using the correction factors and the energy difference between utilized Stark sublevels. This hypothesis had been tested on Lu2O3:Eu3+, by the LIR of 5D07F4 emissions after 5D07F1,2 excitations, with an excellent matching (99.9%) of the LIR B parameter. Thus, this model may be used as a tool

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Aleksandar Ćirić: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Ivana Zeković: Investigation. Mina Medić: Resources. Željka Antić: Project administration, Funding acquisition. Miroslav D. Dramićanin: Conceptualization, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia.

References (29)

  • K. Binnemans

    Interpretation of europium(III) spectra

    Coord. Chem. Rev.

    (2015)
  • S.W. Allison et al.

    Remote thermometry with thermographic phosphors: instrumentation and applications

    Rev. Sci. Instrum.

    (1997)
  • S.A. Wade et al.

    Fluorescence intensity ratio technique for optical fiber point temperature sensing

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (2003)
  • X. Ge et al.

    The modified upconversion nanomaterials (UCNMs) for multimodal imaging and therapies

    Biomed. Spectrosc. Imag.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (32)

    • A theoretical framework for optical thermometry based on excited-state absorption and lifetimes of Eu<sup>3+</sup> compounds

      2022, Journal of Luminescence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recently, investigation on lanthanide optical thermometry has been growing exponentially in the last years [1].

    • Highly sensitive temperature reading from intensity ratio of Eu<sup>3+</sup> And Mn<sup>4+</sup>emissions in Y<inf>3</inf>Al<inf>5</inf>O<inf>12</inf> nanocrystals

      2022, Materials Research Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      The largest energy difference of ∼1750 cm−1 among used trivalent lanthanide centers is between 5D0 and 5D1 energy levels of Eu3+, providing maximal relative sensitivity of LIR of ∼2.8% K−1 at room temperature [10]. Different novel but more difficult-to-implement methods, such as energy transfer, dual excitation, binary probes, and others, can be used to circumvent this constraint of thermometry based on thermally coupled levels [11–14]. Herein, we are focusing on dual-activated ratiometric intensity measurements, an innovative approach in temperature read-outs that, among others, employ luminescent probes with different combinations of temperature-independent lanthanide (Ln) and rapidly quenched transition metal (TM) ions’ emission.

    • Temperature dependence of red emission in YPO<inf>4</inf>:Pr<sup>3+</sup> nanopowders

      2022, Journal of Luminescence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, by seeking excellent spatial and temporal resolution, for remote temperature detection, with high precision, luminescent nanoparticles-based nano-thermometry has attract much more researcher attentions of this field. Nevertheless, the complex and interdisciplinary nature of many currently known applications require the acquisition of new expertise and basic scientific knowledge [50–53]. In the framework of this work, one can think to study the feasibility of using emissions from 1D2 sublevels of Pr3+ doped YPO4 nanophosphor as luminescent material for single-center optical nanothermometer application [54].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text