Aspects of tool production, use, and hafting in Palaeolithic assemblages from Northeast Africa

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.01.001Get rights and content

Abstract

A detailed microwear study was performed on several assemblages from Northeast Africa to provide an anthropological scenario of late middle and upper Pleistocene populations in the Nile Valley and adjacent zones. Results are presented from the wear analysis of five sites, and an interpretation is provided of the keystones of MSA behaviour and its evolution throughout about 150,000 years. Locally available raw materials were predominantly used. Different tool uses were identified based on wear evidence, and it was demonstrated that stone tools were hafted from at least the early MSA onwards. In particular stone tools for which hafting was a necessity for their use, such as percussion implements and projectiles, were hafted. Both tool functions remain important throughout the Middle Stone Age. For tools with other uses, such as knives, hafting was demonstrated in certain cases. Hafting proved to be integrated into the stone tool production process, indicating a certain degree of anticipation and planning. Ochre was present at most of the sites in different forms, and mainly seems to have served a utilitarian function, and a possible symbolic use. The included sites could be interpreted as specialised sites, and in all but one case were situated in a production context. The evidence indicates the existence of a regional settlement system with different logistic nodes.

Introduction

In the past, detailed microwear studies of Middle Stone Age (MSA) material were rarely attempted due to the perception that preservation conditions would preclude positive results. Thanks to progress in microwear studies, the impact of post-depositional processes is currently better understood (Levi-Sala, 1986, Levi-Sala, 1996), and interpretations rest on firmer methodological grounds. The rise of residue analysis (Fullagar et al., 1996, Fullagar, 1998) positively influenced the renewed interest in functional studies of MSA material (Lombard, 2004, Lombard, 2005, Lombard, 2008). MSA stone tools are often made from coarser-grained raw materials (e.g., quartz, quartzite) than the fine-grained flint that is generally used in European sites. These coarser materials initially discouraged more standard microwear analyses. Residue analysis, preferably in combination with use-wear analysis (Rots and Williamson, 2004), provides a solution to this problem, at least for newly excavated sites where precautions that are necessary to prevent contamination can be observed during excavation and subsequent handling (Fullagar et al., 1996, Fullagar, 1998). Nevertheless, more standard microwear analyses have also been performed (Donahue et al., 2004). Interpretative possibilities now extend beyond wear resulting from tool use only (Keeley, 1980, Odell, 1980) and include inferences regarding tool production, handling, and hafting (Rots et al., 2001, Rots et al., 2006, Rots, 2002a, Rots, 2002b, Rots, 2003, Rots, 2004, Rots, 2005, Rots, 2010a). For more recent periods in Europe, it has been demonstrated that an integrated functional analysis of different raw materials (Van Gijn, 2008) and the integration of functional results with typological, technological, and spatial data contribute significantly to a better comprehension of behavioural systems (Cahen et al., 1979, Cahen and Keeley, 1980, Pétrequin et al., 1998, De Bie and Caspar, 2000). The latter procedure is also believed to have important potential for MSA studies, particularly now that prehension and hafting can be integrated (Rots and Van Peer, 2006, Van Peer et al., 2008). Hafting has always been considered an important issue in human evolution studies and has been proposed as one of the indicators of modern behaviour (McBrearty and Brooks, 2000).

Systematic wear analysis has formed part of a large-scale research project aimed at the description of technological chaînes opératoires of MSA sites in Northeast Africa as evidenced in both the appearance and the structure of their lithic assemblages. On the premise that an understanding of the operational principles in the domain of lithic technology offers insight into aspects of the social system at work, the overall goal of this project is to provide an anthropological scenario of late middle and upper Pleistocene populations in the environments of the Nile Valley and adjacent zones. In a number of contributions we have reported on the wear analysis of specific assemblages (Rots and Van Peer, 2006, Van Peer et al., 2008). Here, it is our intention to present primary data for a number of other assemblages from five sites and to provide an interpretation of some keystones of behaviour and their evolution through ∼150,000 years of the Middle Stone Age in Northeast Africa.

Section snippets

The sites

Short descriptions of all the sites concerned in this wear analysis are presented below (Fig. 1). First, however, we recapitulate some issues relating to general taxonomy. In this article we adopt our previously expressed position (Van Peer and Vermeersch, 2007) that the sub-Saharan nomenclature is appropriate for the designation of northeast African assemblages from the projected window of time.

Within the MSA, the Nubian Complex has been defined as a regional variant (Clark, 1988). Conceived

Methods

Functional wear studies have used different procedures to obtain data, differing mainly in the magnification and equipment used (Anderson-Gerfaud, 1980, Keeley, 1980, Odell, 1981, Fullagar et al., 1996). As demonstrated elsewhere, the most fruitful and reliable approach is one that combines different methods (Rots, 2003, Rots et al., 2006). Therefore, whenever possible, a macroscopic, low power and high power analysis were combined for this research. Low power analysis is performed with a

Sai 8-B-11: the early MSA levels

The functional results discussed here concern the Lower and Middle Sangoan and the Lupemban levels (Van Peer et al., 2004). Results obtained for the core-axes of the Middle Sangoan level were published in Rots and Van Peer (2006). Here, the remaining part of the Middle Sangoan assemblage is incorporated and the core-axe data are compared with data obtained for other levels.

A total of 656 pieces, for the three levels, was examined under the microscope for wear traces (Table 1). This number

Sodmein cave

Ten pieces were examined, all of which are end products and some of which are retouched (Table 3; see also Van Peer et al., 1996, Van Peer and Vermeersch, 2000). The results are summarised in Table 3.

Most pieces showed signs of use and the pieces with a preserved non-active part showed distinct evidence of hafting in the form of wear traces and residues. Tip fragments with evidence of use in hunting also provide indirect evidence of hafting, as hafting was a condition for their use as a

Taramsa 1

The analysis of a late MSA assemblage with transitional technological features from Taramsa 1 differs in nature from the previously analysed sites. First of all, it is clear that the site, throughout its long history, exclusively served as a chert extraction and workshop locale (Van Peer et al., 2010). Hence, a different realm of the behavioural spectrum of the late MSA groups is represented here, posing other questions and challenges to a wear analysis. Furthermore, the features of lithic

Sai 8-B-11: the upper levels

As mentioned, late MSA occupation levels are found within Nilotic silts overlying the middle Pleistocene sediments that contain the early MSA. These silts have been heavily affected by vertisol formation, resulting in serious post-depositional displacement of the lithic debris. Deflation and slope wash processes have further added to the loss of primary contexts. Even if a succession of distinct occupation events took place during the deposition of these floodplain sediments, it can be assumed

Nazlet Khater-4

The early Upper Palaeolithic axes of Nazlet Khater-4 show a remarkable degree of morphological similarity to the Sangoan core-axes of Sai 8-B-11 (Fig. 23). It has been argued elsewhere that the early Upper Palaeolithic industry of Nazlet Khater-4 is part of a process of technological transformation from within the Nubian Complex (Van Peer et al., 2010). An axe of Nazlet Khater-type also occurs in one of the latest assemblages at Taramsa 1 and at other Nubian Complex sites like Bir Tarfawi

Discussion

Before discussing some wider implications of these results, some considerations are essential regarding the nature of the presented data. While the functional analysis of the material from Sai 8-B-11 concerned large percentages of the assemblages (for the early MSA even the complete assemblages) and is thus representative for Sai 8-B-11 as a whole, this is not the case for the Egyptian material where the functional analysis is restricted to small or very small samples. For Sodmein Cave, only

Conclusion

The predominance of percussion implements and projectiles throughout the MSA is important. Percussion tools and projectiles are the first tools to be hafted and in a later stage also the first tools that are morphologically adapted to facilitate hafting. The percussion implements are obviously linked with heavy-duty work, in the form of sub-surface exploitation of resources, but in later stages also with woodworking. The projectiles indicate the existence of hunting, both in the form of thrown

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the Onderzoeksfonds of the “Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Fund for Scientific Research – Flanders for their financial support of this research. The Egyptian sites were excavated over the years as part of the Belgian Middle Egypt Prehistoric Project of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Research at Sai Island is a joint effort of the Mission archéologique française from the University of Lille III (former director F. Geus†) and of the Prehistoric Archaeology Unit

References (135)

  • N. Mercier et al.

    Thermoluminescence dating of a middle palaeolithic occupation at Sodmein cave, red Sea Mountains (Egypt)

    J. Archaeol. Sci.

    (1999)
  • S.H. Ambrose

    Small things remembered: origins of early microlithic industries in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • P. Anderson-Gerfaud

    A testimony of prehistoric tasks: diagnostic residues on stone tool working edges

    World Archaeol.

    (1980)
  • P. Anderson-Gerfaud et al.

    L’emmanchement au Moustérien

  • F. Audouin et al.

    Les ocres et leurs témoins au Paléolithique en France: enquête et expériences sur leur validité archéologique

    Cahiers du centre de recherché préhistoriques

    (1982)
  • L.S. Barham

    Possible early pigment use in South-Central Africa

    Curr. Anthropol.

    (1998)
  • L.S. Barham

    Systematic pigment use in the middle Pleistocene of South-central Africa

    Curr. Anthropol.

    (2002)
  • Barham, L.S., Pinto Llona, A.C., Stringer, C.B., 2002. Bone tools from broken Hill (Kabwe) cave, Zambia, and their...
  • S. Beyries

    Quelques exemples de stigmates d’emmanchements observés sur des outils du Paléolithique moyen

  • S. Beyries

    Étude tracéologique des racloirs du niveau IIA

  • S. Beyries

    Le travail du cuir chez les Tchouktches et les Athapaskans: implications ethno-archéologiques

  • S. Beyries et al.

    Typologie, ocre, fonction. Tailler! pour quoi faire: Préhistoire et technologie lithique II. Recent Progress in Microwear Studies

    (1982)
  • L.R. Binford

    Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation

    Am. Antiq.

    (1980)
  • E. Boëda

    Le concept Levallois: variabilité des méthodes

    (1994)
  • E. Boëda

    Middle Palaeolithic bitumen use at Umm el Tlel around 70,000 BP

    Antiquity

    (2008)
  • E. Boëda et al.

    Bitumen as a hafting material on Middle Palaeolithic artefacts

    Nature

    (1996)
  • F. Bordes

    Typologie du Paléolithique ancien et moyen

    (1961)
  • C.B. Bousman

    Hunter-gatherer adaptations, economic risk and tool design

    Lithic Technol.

    (1993)
  • J. Büller

    Handling, hafting and ochre Stains

  • D. Cahen

    Typologie Nouvelles fouilles à la pointe de la Gombe (ex-pointe de Kalina), Kinshasha, Zaire

    L’Anthropologie

    (1976)
  • D. Cahen et al.

    Not less than 2, not more than 3

    World Archaeol.

    (1980)
  • D. Cahen et al.

    Stone tools, toolkits, and human-behavior in prehistory

    Curr. Anthropol.

    (1979)
  • V.P. Chabai et al.

    Western Crimea Middle Palaeolithic paleoenvironment and paleoeconomy

  • J.D. Clark

    The middle stone age of East Africa and the beginnings of regional identity

    J. World Prehist.

    (1988)
  • J.D. Clark

    Kalambo Falls Prehistoric Site: Volume 3, the Earlier Cultures: Middle and Earlier Stone Age

    (2001)
  • J.D. Clark

    Ecological and behavioral implications of the siting of Middle Stone Age rockshelters and cave settlement in Africa

  • D.L. Clarke

    Analytical Archaeology

    (1968)
  • N.J. Conard

    Tonchesberg and Its Position in the Paleolithic Prehistory of Northern Europe

    (1992)
  • N.J. Conard

    River terraces, volcanic craters and Middle Paleolithic Settlement

  • N.J. Conard et al.

    Lithic reduction and Hominid behavior in the middle paleolithic of the Rhineland

    J. Anthropol. Res.

    (1997)
  • C. Couraud

    Pigments utilisés en Préhistoire: provenance, préparation, mode d’utilisation

    L’Anthropologie

    (1988)
  • I. Crevecoeur

    Étude anthropologique du squelette du Paléolithique supérieur de Nazlet Khater 2 (Égypte). Apport à la compréhension de la variabilité passée des hommes modernes

    (2008)
  • M. De Bie et al.

    Rekem. A Federmesser Camp on the Meuse River Bank

    (2000)
  • D. De Loecker
    (2005)
  • F. d’Errico et al.

    Bone tool use in termite foraging by early hominids and its impact on our understanding of early hominid behaviour

    S. Afr. J. Sci.

    (2001)
  • F.P. Dickson

    Australian Stone Hatchets. A Study in Design and Dynamics

    (1981)
  • R.E. Donahue et al.

    Lithic microwear analysis of Middle Stone Age Artifacts from white paintings rock shelter, Botswana

    J. Field Archaeol.

    (2004)
  • C. Ferring

    The Aterian in North African prehistory

  • Cited by (111)

    • Stone tool backing and adhesion in hunting weaponry: First results of an experimental program

      2022, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Currently, the oldest known backed tools occur in deposits dated to > 265 kya at the sites of Kalambo Falls and Twin Rivers in Zambia (Barham, 2002). Quartz backed tools from Sai Island in Sudan date to ca. 180 – 220 kya (Rots et al., 2011). At Mumbwa in Zambia backed quartz blades are dated to ca. 130 – 116 kya (Barham, 2000).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text