doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.08.037
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
Temperature enhanced electroporation under the pulsed electric field treatment of food tissue
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Nikolai I. Lebovkaa, b, Iurie Praporscica, Sami Ghnimia and Eugene Vorobieva,
, 
aDepartement de Génie Chimique, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Centre de Recherche de Royallieu, B.P. 20529-60205 Compiègne Cedex, France
bInstitute of Biocolloidal Chemistry named after F.D. Ovcharenko, NAS of Ukraine, 42, blvr. Vernadskogo, Kyiv 03142, Ukraine
Received 24 May 2004;
accepted 6 August 2004.
Available online 17 November 2004.
Abstract
The temperature dependence of effects exerted by pulsed electric fields (PEF) on the electrical conductivity and textural relaxation of potato tissue was investigated in the interval of 22–50 °C. The pronounced decrease of the characteristic electrical damage time τ with increase of both temperature T and electric field strength E was observed. Textural data reveal the essential temperature influence on tissue softening after the PEF treatment. The investigation of thermally induced damage at temperatures within 45–60 °C shows that effects observed below 50 °C are not related to any noticeable irreversible damage of the cellular membranes and reflect only effect of structural transitions in membranes on electroporation. It is of practical importance that PEF treatment under the mild thermal conditions (below 50 °C) allows to reach high tissue disintegration degree at moderate electric field strength (below 100 V/cm).
Keywords: Electroporation; Temperature dependence; Pulsed electric field; Texture; Characteristic damage time; Potato
Nomenclature
- d
- sample diameter (mm)
- E
- PEF intensity (V/cm)
- E0
- empirical parameter (V/cm)
- F
- force (N)
- h
- Sample height (mm)
- n
- number of pulses
- N
- number of trains
- R
- universal gas constant, 8.314 (J K−1 mol−1)
- t
- time (s)
- ti
- pulse duration (μs)
- t∞
- effective relaxation time (s)
- tPEF
- time of PEF treatment (s)
- Δt
- pulse repetition time (ms)
- Δtt
- time pause between trains (s)
- T
- temperature (°C)
- um
- transmembrane potential (V)
- u0
- voltage parameter (V)
- ΔU
- activation energy (kJ/mol)
- Z
- electrical conductivity disintegration index
Subscripts
- E
- electrical
- T
- thermal
Greeks
- ρ
- correlation coefficient
- σ
- electrical conductivity (S m−1)
- τ
- characteristic damage time (s)
- τ∞
- limiting characteristic damage time (s)
Abbreviation
- PEF
- pulsed electric fields
Fig. 1. A scheme of the experimental setup. See text for details.
Fig. 2. Conductivity disintegration index Z versus time of PEF treatment tPEF at the electric field strength E = 70 V/cm and different temperatures. Here, symbols correspond to the experimental data and solid lines are drawn for the guidance of an eye.
Fig. 3. Characteristic electrical damage time τE versus electric field strength E at different temperatures. Here, symbols correspond to the experimental data and solid lines show results of the least square fitting of experimental data using Eq. (3). The error bars represent standard data deviations.
Fig. 4. The empirical parameters τE,∞, ΔUE, and E0 in Eq. (3) versus temperature. Here, symbols with error bars correspond to the experimental data and solid lines are drawn for the guidance of an eye.
Fig. 5. Force versus time t curves for potatoes, freeze-thawed and treated by PEF at the electric field strength E = 70 V/cm, different time of PEF treatment tPEF and temperatures T = 22 °C (a) and T = 50 °C (b). The relaxation measurements were carried out at T = 22 °C.
Fig. 6. Effective relaxation time t∞ versus PEF treatment time tPEF for the potato samples at different temperatures T. Dashed horizontal line shows limiting values for freeze-thawed potatoes.
Fig. 7. Arrhenius plot of the characteristic thermal damage time τT versus inverse temperature 1/T for the potatoes. Points are the experimental data, solid line is the result of the linear least mean square fitting.

Corresponding author. Tel.: +33 3 4423 5273; fax: +33 3 4423 1980