doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.024
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
“How good are you in math?” The effect of gender stereotypes on students’ recollection of their school marks
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must
purchase this article.
Armand Chatard
, a, b, c,
, Serge Guimonda, b, c and Leila Selimbegovica, b, c
aUniversity of Geneva, Switzerland
bUniversity of Clermont-Ferrand, France
cUniversity of Paris V, France
Received 13 April 2005;
revised 10 October 2006.
Available online 15 December 2006.
Abstract
Two studies examined the effect of gender stereotypes on students’ recollection of their school marks in stereotypically feminine (arts) and masculine (mathematics) domains. As predicted, the results of Study 1 indicated that the more students believed in gender stereotypes prior to recall, the more they biased their reported marks, compared to their actual marks, in a stereotype-consistent way (female students underestimated their marks in mathematics and male students underestimated their marks in arts). Study 2, in which the salience of gender stereotypes was manipulated prior to recall, yielded similar findings. The recall of school marks was more stereotype-consistent in a condition of high salience than in a condition of low salience of gender stereotypes. The theoretical implications of these results are discussed.
Keywords: Gender stereotypes; Stereotype-consistent recall; School marks
Fig. 1. Bias in recall of school marks in arts as a function of gender stereotype belief (1 standard deviation below and above the mean) and participant’s sex (Study 1).
Fig. 2. Bias in recall of school marks in mathematics as a function of gender stereotype belief (1 standard deviation below and above the mean) and participant’s sex (Study 1).
Fig. 3. Bias in recall of school marks in arts as a function of gender stereotype salience and participant’s sex (Study 2).
Fig. 4. Bias in recall of school marks in mathematics as a function of gender stereotype salience and participant’s sex (Study 2).
Table 1.
Correlations (Study 1)

p < .05.

p < .01.


p < .001.
+ p < .10.

Corresponding author. Present address: Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Éducation, Uni Mail 40 Boulevard du Pont d’Arve, CH-1205 Genève, Switzerland