ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (249 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.007    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Failure to warn: How student race affects warnings of potential academic difficultystar, open

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Jennifer Randall CrosbyCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Benoît Monina

aDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, USA


Received 29 July 2005; 
revised 27 June 2006. 
Available online 31 October 2006.

Abstract

In two studies, we document “failure to warn”—a reduced likelihood of warning Black students against potential academic difficulty compared to White students. In both studies, participants placed in the role of academic advisors saw a highly challenging academic course plan, attributed to either a Black or a White student, and gave Black students less warning about the potential negative consequences of taking on the proposed plan. Study 1 (N = 172) demonstrates this effect using undergraduate peer academic advisors, and Study 2 (N = 58) provides evidence that this effect is moderated by Internal Motivation to Respond Without Prejudice (Plant & Devine, 1998), suggesting that this effect is driven by the fear that discouraging an ambitious Black student might reflect prejudice. This well-intentioned concern can have the ironic consequence of leading the recipients of this advice into academic difficulties.

Keywords: Academic advice; Norms against prejudice; Course load; Academic feedback; Concerns with prejudice; Differences in advice; Race; Intergroup perception

Article Outline

1. Introduction
Norms against prejudice
Academic feedback and advice
The present studies
Study 1
Method
Participants
Materials pre-testing
Design
Procedure
Results
Discussion
Study 2
Method
Participants
Materials
Procedure
Results
Student assessment
Main analyses
Discussion
General discussion
Diversity of participant population
Consequences of the failure to warn
Equalizing advice
Final thoughts
References

star, openThis research was supported by a Clara Mayo Grant from the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues. We are grateful to Diann McCants and Valerie Purdie-Vaughns for their assistance with administering Study 1, as well as the following research assistants: Alison Cordeiro, Kali Cyrus, Sarah Degerman, Owen Frivold, Damien Jackson, Famia Nkansa, Katrina Redfern, and Kathleen Ryou. We are grateful to Sapna Cheryan, Jennifer Eberhardt, Brian Lowery, Claude Steele, and Julie Turchin for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.


Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. Present address: Department of Psychology, Agnes Scott College, 141 E. College Avenue, Decatur, GA 30030, USA.

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.