ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (282 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.004    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Is positivity a cue or a response option? Warm glow vs evaluative matching in the familiarity for attractive and not-so-attractive facesstar, open

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

O. Corneillea, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, B. Moninb and G. Pleyersa

aCatholic University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

bDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, USA


Received 3 June 2004; 
revised 11 August 2004. 
Available online 7 October 2004.

Abstract

Monin (2003) showed that the attractiveness of a face increases its perceived familiarity regardless of prior exposure, and suggested that this beautiful-is-familiar effect was due to the misattribution to familiarity of the positive affect (or “warm glow”) elicited by attractive faces. This research tests the alternative interpretation that an evaluative match between a positive stimulus (an attractive face) and a positive response (“familiar”) accounts for this effect in the absence of any misattribution. In a face recognition task, participants were led to signal their sense of familiarity with previously seen and unseen faces by selecting either a pleasant (affectively congruent) or unpleasant (affectively incongruent) image. Consistent with the warm glow heuristic, higher false alarm rates were obtained for more attractive distracters, and this effect survived (and was, if anything, stronger) when an affectively incongruent response format was used. These findings are discussed in the context of current face memory and perceptual fluency models.

Keywords: Face memory; Face attractiveness; Perceptual fluency; Affect; Misattribution

Article Outline

Method
Participants
Materials
Procedure
Results
General discussion
Does the beautiful-is-familiar effect only occur with new faces?
The detrimental impact of an affectively incongruent response format
Conclusion
References

star, openWe thank Raymond Bruyer, Caroline Michel, and Bruno Rossion for their comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.


Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. National Fund for Scientific Research, Brussels, Belgium

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.