ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Volume 102, Issue 3, 1 December 2005, Pages 457-464
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (131 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jep.2005.08.049    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd All rights reserved.

Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-cholinesterase and mutagenic effects of extracts obtained from some trees used in South African traditional medicine

I.M.S. Eldeen, E.E. Elgorashi and J. van StadenCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author

Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa

Received 10 March 2005; 
revised 10 March 2005; 
accepted 16 August 2005. 
Available online 17 October 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Extracts obtained from 10 trees used in South African traditional medicine were screened for antibacterial, anti-inflammatory (COX-1 and COX-2) and anti-cholinesterase activities and investigated for potential mutagenic effects using the Ames test. Antibacterial activity was detected using the disc-diffusion and micro-dilution assays. The extracts were tested against Gram-positive bacteria: Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus and Gram-negative bacteria: Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Of the 78 different plant extracts investigated, 80% showed activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in the disc-diffusion assay. In the micro-dilution assay, 60% of the plant extracts showed minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values ≤1.56 mg ml−1. The lowest MIC value (0.092 mg ml−1) was recorded for an ethyl acetate root extract of Acacia sieberiana against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. In the anti-inflammatory assay, 70% of the investigated plant extracts (0.25 mg ml−1) inhibited both COX-1 and COX-2 activity (>50% and 70% for water and organic solvent extracts, respectively). An ethyl acetate leaf extract of Trichilia dregeana showed selective inhibition of COX-2 (81%). In the acetylcholinesterase inhibitory test, 21% of the plant extracts were active at a concentration ≤1 mg ml−1 using the micro-dilution assay. The lowest IC50 value was 0.04 mg ml−1 obtained with an ethanol bark extract of Combretum kraussii. None of the investigated plants showed any potential mutagenic effects.

Keywords: Antibacterial activity; Anti-inflammatory activity; Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity; Genotoxicity

Abbreviations: AChE, acetylcholinesterase; ATCI, acetylthiocholine iodide; BSA, bovine serum albumin; DTNB, 5,5-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid; INT, iodonitrotetrazolium violet; MH, Mueller–Hinton agar; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; TLC, thin layer chromatography

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant material
2.2. Disc-diffusion assay
2.3. Micro-dilution antibacterial assay
2.4. Cyclooxygenase assays
2.5. Acetylcholinesterase enzyme inhibitory activity
2.6. Genotoxicity test
3. Results
3.1. Antibacterial activity
3.2. Cyclooxygenase activity
3.3. Acetylcholinesterase enzyme inhibitory activity
3.4. Ames genotoxicity assay
4. Discussion and conclusions
Acknowledgements
References

Journal of Ethnopharmacology
Volume 102, Issue 3, 1 December 2005, Pages 457-464
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.