Effect of sawdust addition on composting of separated raw and anaerobically digested pig manure
Highlights
► Low levels of phytotoxicity were found after composting. ► OUR values were lower than the threshold of 13 mmol O2 kg OM−1 h−1. ► Both mixtures produced stable and mature compost. ► The 4:1 mix can reduce the quantity of sawdust used while producing stable compost. ► 60% less sawdust is required per mass of manure at the lower manure/sawdust ratio.
Introduction
Thirty percent of sows in the European Union (EU) are located in a major pig production basin which stretches from Denmark, through north western Germany and the Netherlands to Vlaams Gewest in northern Belgium (Marquer, 2010). Other important regions include Cataluña and Murcia in Spain, Lombardia in Italy, and Brittany in France. In the Republic of Ireland, 38% of the national sow herd is concentrated in counties Cork and Cavan (Boyle, 2010). Pig manure in these concentrated pig farming areas must be transported to less animal dense areas for landspreading, thereby increasing the cost of manure handling. As a result of the EU Nitrates Directive (91/676/EEC; EEC, 1991), the amount of livestock manure which can be applied to land has been limited to 170 kg of nitrogen (N) per hectare per yr. In Ireland, the land available for landspreading will further be restricted, starting in 2013, and culminating in 2017, when landspreading of pig manure can no longer exceed the crop's phosphorus (P) requirements for growth (S.I. 610 of 2010). The implication of this will be that an additional ∼50% land area will be required for manure application than is the case in 2012. The resulting increase in manure transport costs for farmers, along with the potential of surface and groundwater pollution from the landspreading of manure, has resulted in the need to examine practical and economical on-farm solutions for swine wastewater treatment. Recently, anaerobic digestion (AD) has become topical as a means of producing energy from farmyard by-products, including pig manure. However, AD does little to reduce the nutrient content of pig manure, which still needs to be recycled in the same way as undigested manure. One option may be to compost pig manures to produce a high quality, marketable product.
Composting of manure requires separation of the liquid manure to produce a solid and liquid fraction. The solid fraction concentrates the P and can be composted. Composting has the potential to stabilise the organic N fraction of manure and increase its fertiliser value, while, at the same time, reducing its volume and odour, making it cheaper and easier to transport (Bernal et al., 2009). The stabilisation of the OM in the composting materials determines the effectiveness of the composting process. For stabilisation to occur, key factors, such as temperature, aeration, water content (WC), pH and structure must be at an optimum level both initially and throughout the composting process. The C:N ratio is one of the most important factors influencing the quality of compost produced (Zhu, 2007). Sweeten and Auvermann (2008) recommend a C:N ratio of 20–30, while Rynk (1992) recommended 25–30. Since the C:N ratio of separated pig manure is reported to be 11.3 (Huang et al., 2006), the addition of C-rich bulking agents is required to provide optimum C:N conditions. Previous studies have looked at the effect of C:N ratio on composting of manures; however, composting of manure after AD has not been investigated.
Studies have found that the solid fraction from mechanically-separated pig manure was too wet to be composted alone and, therefore, required the use of low-moisture bulking agents (Georgacakis et al., 1996; Nolan et al., 2011). Bulking agents generally have low water and high C contents (Bernal et al., 2009) and, when added to manure before composting, act to increase the C:N ratio, decrease the WC, and improve the structure, porosity and free air space (FAS) of the composting mix. Nolan et al. (2011) investigated the composting of separated pig manure using chopped straw, sawdust, greenwaste and woodchip as bulking agents. Sawdust appeared to be the bulking agent which resulted in the most stable compost. However, the addition of sawdust adds an extra cost to the composting process (Nolan et al., 2012).
There are many different methods used to test compost quality including: germination index (GI) (Tiquia, 2005; Zhu, 2007), oxygen uptake rate (OUR) or CO2 production rate (Wang et al., 2004), water soluble organic C: total organic N ratio (Hue and Liu, 1995; Bernal et al., 1998) and degree of OM humification (Hue and Liu, 1995). Industry-led quality standards for biodegradable material-derived compost are currently being developed for Ireland (Prasad and Foster, 2006). As part of these standards, an OUR test has been recommended for measuring compost stability. As manure-based compost will have to adhere to these new standards, it is imperative that farmers are provided with the necessary information to enable compliance. There are currently no European standards for compost and growing media (Baumgarten, 2011). However, this may not be the case in the future as the European Peat Media Association has called for standards to be developed. These standards would likely be based on CEN test methods, including EN 106086-2, Determination of plant response (cress seed germination test) and EN 10087-1, Determination of the aerobic biological activity (OUR test) (Baumgarten, 2011). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adding different quantities of sawdust as a bulking agent to separated raw and anaerobically digested pig manures on the physico-chemical properties, maturity and stability of the compost produced. Compost maturity was measured using a GI test, while stability was measured using an OUR test.
Section snippets
Raw materials for composting
Two composting trials were conducted to determine the effect varying the proportion of sawdust to either separated raw or separated anaerobically digested pig manures. In trial 1 (T1), raw pig manure was collected from an uncovered over-ground manure storage tank at the Teagasc Pig Development Department, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland, and was a mixture of pig manure from all stages of pig production. In trial 2 (T2), anaerobically digested pig manure was collected from another pig farm
Physical changes
From day 0 to approximately day 7, all treatments in both trials were malodorous. This was particularly noticeable when the tumblers were opened for sampling. However, by day 14 the pungent odour could no longer be detected. Water was observed to be leaching out of the tumblers in Treatment A for both trials. There was no leaching recorded from Treatments B and C in either trial.
On day 0, when the tumblers were filled, the separated pig manure had the flaky appearance of peat. However, for both
Conclusions
Composts with manure to sawdust ratios of 4:1 and 3:2 (fresh weight) were found to be stable after 56 days of aerobic composting. Both treatments met the proposed stability standard for composts in the Republic of Ireland. No differences between these two treatments were found for the stability test (oxygen uptake rate) and the maturity test (germination index).
It is concluded that co-composting either separated raw or separated anaerobically digested pig manures with sawdust at a
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Irish Department of Agriculture Food and Fisheries's Research Stimulus Fund Programme (RSFP) under the National Development Plan 2007–2013. Shane Troy's PhD was funded by the Teagasc Walsh Fellowship scheme. The authors would like to thank Dr. Brendan Lynch and Tomas Ryan from the Teagasc, Pig Development Department in Moorepark and Dr. Munoo Prasad for their assistance during this work.
References (38)
- et al.
Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review
Bioresour. Technol.
(2009) - et al.
The biology of composting: a review
Waste Manage. Res.
(1983) - et al.
Composting and storage of organic household waste with different litter amendments. II: nitrogen turnover and losses
Bioresour. Technol.
(2000) - et al.
Composting solid swine manure and lignite mixtures with selected plant residues
Bioresour. Technol.
(1996) - et al.
Effect of C/N on composting of pig manure with sawdust
Waste Manage.
(2004) - et al.
Transformation of organic matter during co-composting of pig manure with sawdust
Bioresour. Technol.
(2006) - et al.
Characterisation of bulking agents and its effect of physical properties of compost
Bioresour. Technol.
(2010) - et al.
Characterization of separated pig manure composted with a variety of bulking agents at low initial C/N ratios
Bioresour. Technol.
(2011) - et al.
Microbial activities during composting of spent pig-manure sawdust litter at different moisture contents
Bioresour. Technol.
(1996) - et al.
Changes in chemical properties during composting of spent pig litter at different moisture contents
Agric. Eco. Environ.
(1998)
Elimination of phytotoxicity during co-composing of spent pig-manure sawdust litter and pig sludge
Bioresour. Technol.
Fate of nitrogen during composting of chicken litter
Environ. Pollut.
Maturity indices for composted dairy and pig manures
Soil Biol. Biochem.
Effect of initial low C/N ratio on aerobic composting of swine manure with rice straw
Bioresour. Technol.
A modified air pycnometer for compost air volume and density determination
Can. Biosyst. Eng.
European standardisation of growing media – a review
Maturity and stability parameters of composts prepared with a wide range of organic wastes
Bioresour. Technol.
Teagasc National Pig Conference 2010
Moisture effect on compaction and permeability in composts
J. Environ. Eng.
Cited by (57)
Processes, applications and legislative framework for carbonized anaerobic digestate: Opportunities and bottlenecks. A critical review
2022, Energy Conversion and ManagementResponses of bacterial communities and antibiotic resistance genes to nano-cellulose addition during pig manure composting
2021, Journal of Environmental ManagementApplication of recycled ferric chloride for alkalinity regulation of bauxite residue
2021, Journal of Cleaner ProductionAppraisal and ranking of poly-aluminium chloride, ferric chloride and alum for the treatment of dairy soiled water
2020, Journal of Environmental Management