The main determinants of new product development ability for international markets: An empirical study on brazilian manufacturing export companies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101569Get rights and content

Highlights

  • NPDA stands for the ability to systematically develop, launch and introduce new products in the market more skillfully than the competitors.

  • What makes medium and large manufacturing export companies achieve higher NPDA performance in international and turbulent environments?

  • Five constructs are proposed as main determinants of NPDA and a structural equations model was validated in automotive and metal-mechanic sector.

  • New Product Development Ability (NPDA) for international markets is explained by 79,7 % from these main determinants in a chain of relationships.

  • An NPDA Framework is presented, contributing for a research agenda and industry best practices in Innovation and Technology Management field.

Abstract

To compete effectively on a global scale, companies must increase capabilities that lead them to greater performance in developing new products. This research validated a model about the influence of the main determinants of the New-Product Development Ability (NPDA) for international and turbulent markets. Involving a cross-sectional survey of 167 manufacturing export companies, the results showed that NPDA is explained by 79 % from these determinants. The model validation provided support to an emerging framework, sustaining on how these five main determinants are key success factors for NPDA. Consequences of these foundations to research agenda and companies’ best practices are discussed.

Introduction

Why are some manufacturing industries more capable of developing, launching and systematically introducing new products into international and turbulent markets more skillfully than their competitors? This study seeks to analyze why some medium and large-size Brazilian manufacturing export companies from the metal-mechanic and automotive sector have a greater New-Product Development Ability level (NPDA) for the international and turbulent market than others, achieving greater NPDA Performance.

Competitiveness must come from innovation and not only from cost reduction. Therefore, the capabilities for new-product development and innovation have become increasingly necessary in the scenario of globalization and turbulence (Slater et al., 2014; Yang, 2012; Kaminski et al., 2008). In order to effectively compete in the global market, companies need to develop capabilities that lead to greater performance in the development and introduction of new products (Holahan et al., 2014; Johnson and Fillipini, 2013; Lee et al., 2011). Thus, the capability to introduce new products generate a source of possible competitive advantage and productivity, as observed by Hana (2013) and Crespi and Zuniga (2012). Moreover, in international markets, competition occurs in environments of higher turbulence and uncertainty, requiring change and adaptation capabilities where knowledge becomes the main factor of production and competitive advantage (Cordes and Hülsmann, 2014; Afgan and Carvalho, 2010).

Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities offers a new understanding of the determinants affecting performance in newproduct development, and it constitutes an object of study and interest both for academia, the government and the business sector (Goedhuys and Veugelers, 2012; Sun and Du, 2010; Wan et al., 2005). Among these determinants, learning capability, organizational creativity, international entrepreneurial orientation, technological capabilities and reconfiguration capabilities are highlighted. These determinants were selected for this study considering four trends that are affecting manufacturing industries. The first one is the evolution of the Knowledge Society, that argues a knowledge economy existence. Companies that have more domain of knowledge as a resource can gain strategic competitiveness, and this paradigm is shaped by uncertainty, requiring constant change and adaptation capability (Kornienko, 2012; Sther and History of Knowledge Society, 2015; Arvanitidis, 2011; Carrilo, 2005). Therefore, learning capabilities, technological capabilities and reconfiguration capabilities become more important in this scenario (Cordes and Hülsmann, 2014; Makkonen et al., 2014; Açikdilli et al., 2013; Ellonen et al., 2011). The other trend is the increasing globalization, which pushes the internationalization level of organizations to compete in international markets, and therefore, require the company’s new behaviors to do so (Dimitratos et al., 2016, 2012; Schweizer et al., 2010; Onetti et al., 2010). In this case, International Entrepreneurial Behavior is considered since the modern's theoretical theories treat internationalization as an entrepreneur process. The third trend is the emergence and evolution of Creative Economy, that implies creativity as a source of aggregated value. That means imagination producing economic value, recognizing knowledge and individual’s and teams creativity (Im et al., 2013; Crespi and Zuniga, 2012; Damanpour and Aravind, 2012; Becky and Okhuysen, 2011; Howkins, 2001). Altough Creative Industries are a sector “per se,” the increasing convergence of Design, IT, Gaming Industries with traditional manufacturing, aggregating value in products, process or services, especially when it comes to start up’s collaboration, is something observed in industry. The fourth trend is innovation as a strategic driver of competitiveness and development, especially in the national-level strategy (Block and Keller, 2011). Once innovation becomes more important to competitive advantage, so does the new product development ability of a company (Huang et al., 2015; Brattström et al., 2012). Therefore, the determinants to achieve innovative performance, which requires higher levels to systematically develop, launch and introduce new products more skillfully than the competitors, are critical to be studied.

However, there remains the question of, in these trends’ context, how these five determinants can be beneficial to NPDA. Thus, the central research question, based on the delimitation of the themes and their respective trend's justification is: What makes manufacturing companies achieve higher NPDA performance? To address this research question, this article establishes at the following section a theoretical background in Learning Capability, Organizational Creativity, International Entrepreneurial Orientation, Technological Capability, Reconfiguration Capability and New-Product Development Ability to positioning the concepts and to develop seven hypotheses for a structural model to be tested, considering five determinants and their validated scales in the literature.

The research environment for this study considers manufacturing exporter companies, in a sample from medium and large-size industries of the metal-mechanic and automotive sector in Brazil. In the third and fourth section the method is described. Structural Equation Modeling is used to test the chain of relationships, in order to assess the determinants validity as constructs and their direct and indirect influence on NPDA.

With these analysis results, this research offers a new view of the determinants of NPD ability via a chain of entrepreneurial abilities, creative innovative abilities and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities. In order to support the foundations of an NPDA Theoretical Framework and Model, that can be applied in the context of higher turbulence, where creativity and adaptation are more required to address uncertainty. Therefore, this study contributes to advancing the comprehension of the New Product Development Ability main determinants for international markets.

In the final section, the explanations of the mechanisms that create the interface between these determinants are addressed. Considering the data and significant statistical results achieved in NPDA Model, as well as the relationship with the theoretical background, an NPDA Framework is discussed. From the role of Organizational Creativity and International Entrepreneurial Behavior for NPD, this study contributes to expanding the cognitive and knowledge aspects of creative entrepreneurship for innovation in this field. In this sense, this paper outlines in its discussions and implications a new research agenda in NPD. The role of learning capability, organizational creativity, international entrepreneurial orientation, technological capability and reconfiguration capability are proposed as critical foundations for the New-Product Development Ability and drivers of best practices in this industry.

Section snippets

Theoretical model and hypotheses

According to Makkonen et al. (2014), a learning capability is a high order regenerative capability, as it allows an organization to follow its previous change and adopt new practices and forms. For the authors, a capability is the ingredient that allows an organization to acquire, adopt and create new capabilities through its learning processes. For Börjesson et al. (2014) and O'Cass and Sok, (2013), such learning capabilities have the potential to lead an organization to create innovation and

Method

This study used a quantitative-descriptive approach, using a survey with a single cross-section, applying the Structural Equation Modeling method.

Sample

The final sample consisted of 167 medium and large exporting companies, with an average of 46 years of market time, 20 years of export experience and an average of 35 % of exports on their annual sales. This sample represents a portfolio of more than 160,000 customers, a structure of more than 180,000 employees, which aggregate annual revenues over 50 billion Brazilian Reais (about 400 billion US$) with a 9 % average profit margin. This group of companies presented an average launch of 22 new

Conclusion

The research data and analysis present relevant answers by identifying the influence of Learning Capability, Organizational Creativity, International Entrepreneurial Orientation, Reconfiguration Capability and Technological Capability as main determinants of New Product Development Ability in the context of medium and large size manufacturing export companies. Based on the hypothesis tests and determination coefficients, the relationships can be further discussed and NPDA Theoretical Framework

Funding

This research project was funded by CNPq - National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Brazil) and CAPES - Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education.

References (119)

  • P. Dimitratos et al.

    International entrepreneurial culture-Toward a comprehensive opportunity-based operationalization of international entrepreneurship

    Int. Bus. Rev.

    (2012)
  • A. Fernández-mesa et al.

    Entrepreneurial orientation and export intensity: examining the interplay of organizational learning and innovation

    Int. Bus. Rev.

    (2015)
  • H. Gebauer et al.

    Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation

    Eur. Manag. J.

    (2012)
  • S. Gerschewski et al.

    Understanding the drivers of international performance for born global firms: an integrated perspective

    J. World Bus.

    (2015)
  • M. Goedhuys et al.

    Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: firm-level evidence from Brazil

    Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn.

    (2012)
  • R. Jiang et al.

    On the importance of mediating dynamic capabilities for ambidextrous organizations

    Procedia Cirp

    (2014)
  • P.C. Kaminski et al.

    Knowledge transfer in product development processes: a case study in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) of the metal-mechanic sector from São Paulo, Brazil

    Technovation

    (2008)
  • T.M. Lang et al.

    Mediate effect of technology innovation capabilities investment capability and firm performance in Vietnam

    Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.

    (2012)
  • H. Liu

    The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: the mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility

    Decis. Support Syst.

    (2013)
  • D. Monferrer et al.

    Born globals trough knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and network market orientation

    Brq Bus. Res. Q.

    (2015)
  • R.I.S. Munir

    Relationship between transformational leadership and employees’ job satisfaction among the academic staff

    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

    (2012)
  • C.E. Shalley et al.

    The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: where should we go from Here?

    J. Manage.

    (2004)
  • M.L. Sheng et al.

    Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2016)
  • P. Sok et al.

    Achieving superior SME performance: overarching role of marketing, innovation, and learning capabilities

    Australas. Mark. J.

    (2013)
  • T. Suh et al.

    A multi-level investigation of international marketing projects: the roles of experiential knowledge and creativity on performance

    Ind. Mark. Manag.

    (2010)
  • G. Açikdilli et al.

    Dynamic capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation in the new product development

    Int. J. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci.

    (2013)
  • Y.A.C. Acosta et al.

    Entrepreneurial orientation and its impact on the improvement of technological capability in Colombia

    Int. J. Entrep. Small Bus.

    (2014)
  • N.H. Afgan et al.

    The knowledge society: a sustainability paradigm

    CADMUS

    (2010)
  • J. Alegre et al.

    Linking entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the role of organizational learning capability and innovation performance

    J. Small Bus. Manag.

    (2013)
  • P. Arvanitidis

    Defining knowledge-driven economic dynamism in the world economy: a methodological perspective

  • R.P. Bagozzi et al.

    Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models

    J. Acad. Mark. Sci.

    (2012)
  • B.A. Becky et al.

    Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handles surprises

    Acad. Manag. J.

    (2011)
  • A.S. Bharadwaj et al.

    Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q

    Manage. Sci.

    (1999)
  • F. Block et al.

    State of Innovation: the U.S.GOvernament Role in Technology Development

    (2011)
  • J. Boada-grau et al.

    Spanish adaptation of the Creative Potential and Practised Creativity scale (CPPC-17) in the workplace and inside the organization

    Psicothema

    (2014)
  • S. Börjesson et al.

    The challenges of innovation capability building: learning from longitudinal studies of innovation efforts at Renault and Volvo Cars

    J. Eng. Technol. Manag.

    (2014)
  • N. Boso et al.

    Entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation as drivers of product innovation success: a study of exporters from a developing economy

    Int. Small Bus. J.

    (2013)
  • G. Carnabuci et al.

    Where do firms’ recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms’ ability to innovate through technological recombination

    Strateg. Manage. J.

    (2013)
  • J. Carrilo

    A global knowledge agenda based on capital systems

  • H. Chae et al.

    Information technology capability and firm performance : contradictory findings and their possible causes

    Mis Q.

    (2014)
  • L. Chao et al.

    Organizational creativity and organizational innovation performance—moderating Role of Strategic Orientation

    Science Research Management

    (2013)
  • L.I. Chia-ying

    The influence of entrepreneurial orientation on technology commercialization: the moderating roles of technological turbulence and integration

    Afr. J. Bus. Manag.

    (2012)
  • P. Cordes et al.

    How knowledge-based dynamic capabilities help to avoid and cope with path dependencies in the electric mobility sector

    Evolutionary Paths Towards the Mobility Patterns of the Future

    (2014)
  • J. Covin et al.

    International entrepreneurial orientation: conceptual considerations, research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions

    Entrep. Theory Pract.

    (2014)
  • F. Damanpour et al.

    Organizational structure and innovation revisited: from organic to ambidextrous structure

  • P. Dimitratos et al.

    The motivation of international entrepreneurship: the case of Chinese transnational entrepreneurs

    Int. Bus. Rev.

    (2016)
  • H.-K. Ellonen et al.

    The role of dynamic capabilities in developing innovation-related capabilities

    Int. J. Innov. Manag.

    (2011)
  • P. Fan

    The effect of IT capability on firm performance

    Communications in Computer and Information Science

    (2011)
  • Z. Fan et al.

    Proactive and reactive strategic flexibility in coping with environmental change in innovation

    Asian J. Technol. Innov.

    (2015)
  • C. Fornell et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement erros

    J. Mark. Res.

    (1981)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Technological and non-technological innovation effects on firm performance

      2022, Journal of High Technology Management Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Takayama, Watanabe, and Griffy-Brown (2002a) reinforced the idea that for continuity of the firm, successful NPD is essential. To effectively compete on a global scale, firms must increase capabilities that lead to improved performance in NPD (Panizzon, Milan, & Dorin, 2020). Developing capabilities in NPD is a possible source of competitive advantage (Crespi & Zuniga, 2012; Hana, 2013).

    View full text