Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Power-law behaviour, heterogeneity, and trend chasing
Received 10 February 2005;
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
Long-range dependence in volatility is one of the most prominent examples in financial market research involving universal power laws. Its characterization has recently spurred attempts to provide some explanations of the underlying mechanism. This paper contributes to this recent line of research by analyzing a simple market fraction asset pricing model with two types of traders – fundamentalists who trade on the price deviation from estimated fundamental value and trend followers whose conditional mean and variance of the trend are updated through a geometric learning process. Our analysis shows that agent heterogeneity, risk-adjusted trend chasing through the geometric learning process, and the interplay of noisy fundamental and demand processes and the underlying deterministic dynamics can be the source of power-law distributed fluctuations. In particular, the noisy demand plays an important role in the generation of insignificant autocorrelations (ACs) on returns, while the significant decaying AC patterns of the absolute returns and squared returns are more influenced by the noisy fundamental process. A statistical analysis based on Monte Carlo simulations is conducted to characterize the decay rate. Realistic estimates of the power-law decay indices and the (FI)GARCH parameters are presented.
Keywords: Asset pricing; Fundamentalists and trend followers; Market fraction; Stability; Learning; Power law
JEL classification codes: C15; D84; G12
Article Outline
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The MF model
- 3. Analysis of the volatility clustering and power-law behaviour
- 4. Empirical evidence and power-law behaviour of the actual data
- 4.1. Statistics and AC of returns
- 4.2. Estimates of power-law decay index
- 4.3. Volatility clustering, power-law and (FI)GARCH estimates
- 5. Econometric characterization of the power-law properties of the MF model
- 5.1. ACs of returns
- 5.2. Estimates of power-law decay index
- 5.3. Volatility clustering, power-law and (FI)GARCH estimates
- 5.4. Comparing with the actual data in terms of the power-law characteristics
- 6. Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Appendix A. Appendix
- A.1. Statistical results
- References







E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links

Cited By in Scopus (3)






