Elsevier

Journal of Dentistry

Volume 60, May 2017, Pages 50-55
Journal of Dentistry

Effects of tooth-brushing force with a desensitising dentifrice on dentine tubule patency and surface roughness

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the effects of a 5% NovaMin containing dentifrice on dentine tubule patency and surface roughness at 100 g and 400 g tooth brush abrasion forces.

Methods

75 polished human dentine samples were prepared and randomly allocated into one of five groups; control (1), Na2PFO3 100 g abrasion force (2), NovaMin 100 g (3), Na2PFO3 400 g (4) and NovaMin 400 g (5). The control group underwent two 2-min cycles of artificial saliva (AS), one 2-min erosion cycle; the rest underwent two toothbrush abrasion cycles in an AS/dentifrice slurry and one 2-min erosion cycle. All samples were imaged at baseline and post intervention using Tandem Scanning Microscopy and Profilometry to analyse tubule patency and roughness.

Results

Mean tubule patency increased significantly between baseline and post intervention in groups 1,2 and 4 and decreased significantly post intervention in groups 3 and 5 (p < 0.01). Post intervention, there were statistically significant differences in mean patent tubules between NovaMin and the Na2PFO3 and control groups (p < 0.001). Surface roughness increased for all groups between baseline and post interventions (P < 0.001); mean (SD) roughness increases for groups 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were 0.14 (0.05) μm, 0.18 (0.04) μm, 0.16 (0.06) μm, 0.19 (0.07) μm and 0.21 (0.02) μm respectively. Differences between group 1 and 5 were significant (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Brushing with NovaMin resulted in significant dentine tubule occlusion at 100 g and 400 g, but brushing with Na2PFO3 resulted in increased tubule patency. Surface roughness increased significantly at 400 g brushing with NovaMin. There was no correlation between tubule patency and surface roughness.

Clinical significance

A NovaMin desensitising dentifrice resulted in tubule occlusion even at high brushing forces. There was minimal increase in surface roughness at the lower (100 g) brushing force.

Introduction

Dentine hypersensitivity is defined as a short duration, sharp dental pain response to stimuli in the absence of any other pathology [1], [2]. The generally accepted mechanism behind dentine hypersensitivity is the hydrodynamic theory [2], [3]. This involves the rapid transmission of fluid through dentinal tubules triggering neuroreceptors located in the pulp in response to stimuli such as cold and air [4]. The condition is very prevalent in Europe (42%) and especially the UK [5], [6]. Diet [7] as well as tooth-brushing [8], [9] are important aetiologies.

In order for the fluid flow in the hydrodynamic theory to be possible, the dentinal tubules must be patent (open). Studies have identified that teeth diagnosed with dentine hypersensitivity possess a greater number of patent tubules on the dentine surface [10], [11]. It is therefore not surprising that the number of patent tubules on the dentine are used to assess the efficacy of desensitising (tubule occluding) products [12]. Olley et al. developed a robust reproducible method to quantify patent tubules in dentine samples. Dentine samples were scanned using Tandem Scanning Microscopy (TSM) and the images analysed using a software program to quantify the number of patent dentinal tubules [13]. This method was used in a further study investigating the effects of three toothbrush abrasion forces on tubule patency using a standard Na2PFO3 toothpaste [9]. This study reported an association between increased tubule patency and increased abrasion after one erosion-abrasion cycle, with significant differences at the 100 g and 400 g abrasion forces [9]. However, the effects of a densensitising (tubule occluding) dentifrice at these brushing forces (100 g and 400 g) and whether the higher brushing force could increase tubule patency despite the dentifrice are unknown. This study investigates if there is a protective effect (reduced tubule patency) of a desensitising dentifrice (5% NovaMin, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Brentford, UK) at both 100 g and 400 g toothbrush abrasion forces in an erosion/abrasion regime. NovaMin is a bioactive glass with calcium sodium phosphosilicate as the active ingredient. It is reputed that this can react in the oral environment to form a hydroxy-carbonate apatite (HCA) over time and is similar to the natural tooth mineral composition [14], [15], [16]. It has been previously shown when comparing two NovaMin containing dentifrices, control and water, that the NovaMin results in dentine tubule occlusion [13].

It should not be supposed from this study that the effect of a desensitising dentifrice might offset the detrimental effect to dentine at higher brushing forces and therefore enable this to occur. The 400 g brushing force is represented as an overzealous regime to investigate the effects on the dentine surface.

In addition, the measurement of surface topography is widely used within dental material science, with rapidly evolving developments [17]. Surface roughness measurements are often used to identify changes in tooth structure following erosive wear and to investigate the efficacy of anti-erosion and remineralising products [18], [19], [20], [21]. Furthermore, tribology studies use roughness parameters to make associations between wear patterns and diet [22], [23]. To the authors’ knowledge a correlation between surface roughness and tubule patency has not been investigated. It can be supposed that a change in the tubule patency of dentine, could effect the surface roughness of dentine due to the surface nature of dentine hypersensitivity [24]. Therefore surface roughness may prove a useful indicator of tubule patency.

The overall aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 5% NovaMin containing dentifrice on dentine tubule patency and surface roughness at two abrasion forces (100 g and 400 g). The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in tubule patency and surface roughness brushing with a NovaMin containing dentifrice at 100 g and 400 g tooth-brushing forces. Also, that tubule patency is not associated with surface roughness.

Section snippets

Sample preparation

Unrestored and caries free human molars were collected under ethical agreement (12/LO/1836) and sterilised in sodium hypochlorite for a minimum of 72 h. The roots were removed and the crowns sectioned using a circular diamond saw (XL 12205, Benetec Ltd., London, UK) to produce 75 sections, no samples were discounted during the study. The sections were embedded in bisacryl composite (Protemp4 3 M ESPE, Germany) using custom made trays to make samples. Sample size calculations were based on Sehmi

TSM

The mean patent tubules at baseline and post intervention for all groups are shown in Table 1. Between baseline and post intervention, there were statistically significant increases in dentine tubule patency in the control and Na2PFO3 groups whereas there were significant decreases in tubule patency for the NovaMin groups. For group 1, control, the mean (SD) number of dentine tubules at baseline was 188 (60) which statistically significantly increased to 245 (49) post erosion (p < 0.01). For

Discussion

This study showed that a 5% NovaMin desensitising dentifrice significantly decreased tubule patency post acid challenge at both 100 g and 400 g abrasion forces. There was a significant difference in roughness change with the 5% NovaMin at 400 g compared to control, but no significant difference in roughness change using the 5% NovaMin at 100 g or the Na2PFO3 dentifrice at 100 g and 400 g. However, there were no statistically significant direct associations between DH and surface roughness. Thus the

Conclusion

Brushing with 5% NovaMin containing dentifrice resulted in significant dentine tubule occlusion at both 100 g and 400 g abrasion forces. Surface roughness only increased significantly at 400 g toothbrush abrasion force with NovaMin; there was minimal increase in surface roughness at 100 g brushing. There was no correlation between tubule patency and surface roughness.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Declaration of funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References (40)

  • Z. Wang et al.

    Effect of desensitising toothpastes on dentinal tubule occlusion: a dentine permeability measurement and SEM in vitro study

    J. Dent.

    (2010)
  • J. Field et al.

    Quantifying and qualifying surface changes on dental hard tissues in vitro

    J. Dent.

    (2010)
  • R.H. Dababneh et al.

    Dentine hypersensitivity—an enigma? A review of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management

    Br. Dent. J.

    (1999)
  • P. Dowell et al.

    Dentine hypersensitivity—a review. Aetiology, symptoms and theories of pain production

    J. Clin. Periodontol.

    (1983)
  • M. Brännström et al.

    The hydrodynamics of the dental tubule and of pulp fluid

    Caries Res.

    (1967)
  • R.C. Olley et al.

    Validation of the basic erosive wear examination

    Caries Res.

    (2014)
  • R.C. Olley et al.

    Validation of a cumulative hypersensitivity index (CHI) for dentine hypersensitivity severity

    J. Clin. Periodontol.

    (2013)
  • E.G. Absi et al.

    Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine

    J. Clin. Periodontol.

    (1987)
  • E.G. Absi et al.

    Dentine hypersensitivity. The development and evaluation of a replica technique to study sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentine

    J. Clin. Periodontol.

    (1989)
  • K. Markowitz et al.

    Discovering new treatments for sensitive teeth: the long path from biology to therapy

    J. Oral Rehabil.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Measurement of eroded dentine tubule patency and roughness following novel dab-on or brushing abrasion

      2020, Journal of Dentistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, other measures of surface roughness have shown purpose in differentiating the nature of tooth wear patterns [19]. However, previous work using Non-Contacting Laser Confocal Profilometry found no correlation between surface roughness and the degree of tubule patency within a worn dentine lesion [10]. This may be due to the nature of non-contacting measurements.

    • Novel Confocal-Laser-Scanning-Microscopy and conventional measures investigating eroded dentine following dentifrice dab-on and brushing abrasion

      2020, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      The authors would add that it is sensible to avoid over-zealous brushing and to not brush immediately following acidic consumption to enable remineralisation. In another previous study, a significant increase in surface roughness was observed following a 400 g (but not lower 100 g) brushing force on eroded dentine using a Novamin dentifrice, compared to the control (eroded only) dentine group [20]. That previous study also showed that a similar effect on surface roughness did not occur following brushing with a sodium fluoride control dentifrice [20].

    • Influence of desensitizing and anti-erosive toothpastes on dentine permeability: An in vitro study

      2019, Journal of Dentistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      We supposed that these toothpastes could have an additional effect on dentine permeability. Although the literature shows a range of studies testing the effect of toothpastes on dentine permeability and tubule occlusion in vitro [16–20], none of them tested the effect of anti-erosive toothpastes. Furthermore, there is a lack of studies analyzing the effect of the toothpastes on reducing dentine permeability when they are applied regularly, during an abrasion challenge and between several erosive challenges.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text