ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B
Volume 92, Issue 1, September 2004, Pages 99-113
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (270 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jctb.2003.09.002    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Crossing number, pair-crossing number, and expansion

Petr KolmanE-mail The Corresponding Author, a, b and JiImage í MatouImage ekE-mail The Corresponding Author, a, b

a Department of Applied Mathematics, Charles University, Malostranské nám. 25, 118 00, Prague 1, Czech Republic Institute of Theoretical Computer Science (ITI),1 Charles University, Malostranské nám. 25, 118 00, Prague 1, Czech Republic

Received 31 March 2003. 
Available online 7 July 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

The crossing number cr(G) of a graph G is the minimum possible number of edge crossings in a drawing of G in the plane, while the pair-crossing number pcr(G) is the smallest number of pairs of edges that cross in a drawing of G in the plane. While cr(G)greater-or-equal, slantedpcr(G) holds trivially, it is not known whether a strict inequality can ever occur (this question was raised by Mohar and Pach and Tóth). We aim at bounding cr(G) in terms of pcr(G). Using the methods of Leighton and Rao, Bhatt and Leighton, and Even, Guha and Schieber, we prove that cr(G)=O(log3 n(pcr(G)+ssqd(G))), where n=|V(G)| and ssqd(G)=∑vset membership, variantV(G) degG(v)2. One of the main steps is an analogy of the well-known lower bound cr(G)=Ω(b(G)2)−O(ssqd(G)), where b(G) is the bisection width of G, that is, the smallest number of edges that have to be removed so that no component of the resulting graph has more than Image vertices. We show that pcr(G)=Ω(b(G)2/log2 n)−O(ssqd(G)).

We also prove by similar methods that a graph G with crossing number

has a nonplanar subgraph on at most Image vertices, where m is the number of edges, Δ is the maximum degree in G, and C is a suitable sufficiently large constant.

Author Keywords: Graph drawing; Crossing number; Pair-crossing number; Expansion

Article Outline

• References

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.