ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
Volume 62, Issue 7, July 2006, Pages 706-715
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (787 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.11.002    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.

Behaviour of normal and high strength concrete-filled compact steel tube circular stub columns

Ehab Ellobodya, Ben Youngb, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Dennis Lamc

aDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt bDepartment of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong cSchool of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Received 9 May 2005; 
accepted 2 November 2005. 
Available online 20 December 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This paper presents the behaviour and design of axially loaded concrete-filled steel tube circular stub columns. The study was conducted over a wide range of concrete cube strengths ranging from 30 to 110 MPa. The external diameter of the steel tube-to-plate thickness (D/t) ratio ranged from 15 to 80 covering compact steel tube sections. An accurate finite element model was developed to carry out the analysis. Accurate nonlinear material models for confined concrete and steel tubes were used. The column strengths and load–axial shortening curves were evaluated. The results obtained from the finite element analysis were verified against experimental results. An extensive parametric study was conducted to investigate the effects of different concrete strengths and cross-section geometries on the strength and behaviour of concrete-filled compact steel tube circular stub columns. The column strengths predicted from the finite element analysis were compared with the design strengths calculated using the American, Australian and European specifications. Based on the results of the parametric study, it is found that the design strengths given by the American Specifications and Australian Standards are conservative, while those of the European Code are generally unconservative. Reliability analysis was performed to evaluate the current composite column design rules.

Keywords: Composite columns; Concrete; High strength; Steel tubes; Finite element; Modeling; Confinement; Structural design

Nomenclature

View the MathML source
Cross-sectional area of concrete
View the MathML source
Cross-sectional area of steel tube
View the MathML source
Correction factor in reliability analysis
COV
Coefficient of variation
D
External diameter of steel tube
View the MathML source
Young’s modulus of confined concrete
View the MathML source
Mean value of fabrication factor
f
Equivalent uniaxial stress
View the MathML source
Unconfined compressive cylinder strength of concrete
View the MathML source
Confined compressive strength of concrete
View the MathML source
Unconfined compressive cube strength of concrete
View the MathML source
Lateral confining pressure
View the MathML source
Ultimate stress of steel tube
View the MathML source
Yield stress of steel tube
K
Ratio of flow stress in triaxial tension to that in compression
k1
Coefficient for confined concrete
k2
Coefficient for confined concrete
k3
Coefficient for confined concrete
L
Length of column
View the MathML source
Mean value of material factor
View the MathML source
Ultimate load obtained from ACI/AS
View the MathML source
Ultimate load obtained from EC4
View the MathML source
Ultimate load obtained from finite element analysis
View the MathML source
Mean value of tested-to-predicted load ratios
View the MathML source
Ultimate load obtained from test
R
Coefficient for confined concrete
View the MathML source
Coefficient for confined concrete
Rε
Coefficient for confined concrete
Rσ
Coefficient for confined concrete
r
Reduction factor for confined concrete
t
Plate thickness of steel tube
View the MathML source
Coefficient of variation of fabrication factor
View the MathML source
Coefficient of variation of material factor
View the MathML source
Coefficient of variation of tested-to-predicted load ratios
X
Local x-coordinate
Y
Local y-coordinate
Z
Local z-coordinate
ε
Equivalent uniaxial strain
View the MathML source
Unconfined concrete strain
View the MathML source
Confined concrete strain
View the MathML source
Ultimate strain of steel tube
β
Material angle of friction
β
Reliability index (safety index)
phi
Resistance (capacity) factor
View the MathML source
Poisson’s ratio of confined concrete
η1,η2
Coefficients of confinement for concrete and steel

Article Outline

Nomenclature
1. Introduction
2. Finite element modeling
2.1. General
2.2. Finite element type and mesh
2.3. Boundary conditions and load application
2.4. Material modeling of steel tubes
2.5. Material modeling of confined concrete
2.6. Concrete–steel tube interface
3. Verification of finite element model
3.1. Experimental results
3.2. Comparison of finite element results with experimental results
4. Parametric study and discussion
5. Comparison with design rules
6. Reliability analysis
7. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References









 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.