Exploring the link between self-control and partner violence: Bad parenting or general criminals
Research Highlights
►This research found a link between self-control and partner violence, but the ties were not explained by bad parenting strategies. ►Child victimization was found to be related to domestic violence as an adult, but the experience of child victimization does not appear to be the link between self-control and partner abuse. ►The link between self-control and partner violence appears to be general criminal histories. ►The results suggest that partner abusers should be treated as general types of offenders, with an aim towards increasing their levels of self-control.
Introduction
Research shows that intimate partner violence is among the most common forms of violence against women (Doerner and Lab, 2005, Payne and Gainey, 2005, Wiehe, 2005). Forms of violence include physical and sexual abuse, psychological abuse, stalking, and a number of other harmful activities. Unlike stranger violence, victims of partner violence are at risk for abuse over extended periods of times and in their own homes. Research shows that offenders are able to commit their abusive actions behind closed doors in these cases, with criminal justice involvement being the exception rather than the norm (Payne & Gainey, 2005). Research also shows that offenders tend to commit multiple forms of partner violence (Koss, Goodman, Browne, Keita, & Russo, 1994). Offenders who physically abuse their partners also are likely to commit psychological and emotional abuse, and many are likely to commit other forms of crime as well (Sherman, 1992).
An emergent literature has begun to explore the usefulness of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory for enhancing understanding of the occurrence of partner abuse. Such applications rely on Gottfredson and Hirschi's (1990) position that their theory is poised to explain a broad range of behaviors. Given this proposed breadth of application, researchers have begun to explore the theory's ability for explaining intimate partner violence, given that this type of violent behavior has been identified apart from other violent acts because of the relational context involved. This different notwithstanding, it has been posited that the same factors that cause crime in general also are at the foundation of partner abuse. Indeed, it is assumed that partner abusers are offenders who commit criminal acts in a variety of settings and against an assortment of targets (Ramirez, 2005, Sherman, 1992, Simon, 1997).
The general theory suggests that crime is caused when individuals with low levels of self-control have the opportunity to commit crime. This study builds on both the low self-control and domestic violence literatures by working to decipher the paths through which self-control may or may not generate partner violence, whether IPA and other forms of crime are caused by the same phenomena, and whether abusers are criminals who commit a variety of criminal acts.
In this study, attention is given to whether self-control theory can be used to explain partner violence. This research is interested not only in this general relationship, but also in whether self-control is linked to partner violence through assumptions underlying self-control theory or through explanations of general criminal behavior. Identifying whether and how low self-control operates can help to determine whether partner violence and other forms of crime are caused by the same phenomena, and whether abusers are criminals who commit a variety of criminal acts, questions which are clearly poised to enhance programming strategies when coping with the effects and outcomes of domestic violence.
Section snippets
Self-control theory and partner violence
Gottfredson and Hirschi's (1990) version of self-control theory is one of the most important theoretical perspectives to emerge in recent years. Provocative claims, mixed with simplicity of concepts with subtle complexities have clearly intrigued scholars, as evidenced by the sheer girth of the empirical literature on the theory. Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) argued that rational individuals would weigh the perceived pleasure of an act against the perceived pain of act when making the decision
The present study
The purpose of the present study is to provide an examination of a specified model to potentially explain partner violence. Specifically, this study hypothesizes that self-control directly, and negatively, impacts the occurrence of partner violence, with those who have high levels of self-control presumed to be less likely to commit partner violence when compared to those with lower levels of self control. Moreover, the relationships that exist between childhood victimization, criminal
Data
A telephone survey was conducted with 375 residents of four small metropolitan areas in southeastern Virginia. Phone numbers were randomly selected by purchasing a list of numbers from a sampling company. Table 1 depicts the characteristics of the sample. Approximately 70 percent of the respondents were females and about two-thirds were white. Less than one in five reported being single, while more than 60 percent were married when they completed the survey. A comparison to census data for
Stage 1
Table 2 reports the bivariate correlations indicate that a positive association exists between partner violence and criminal histories (r = .52). The association between childhood victimization and partner violence is positive (r = .25). The association between self-control and partner violence is negative (r = -.28). These correlations indicate that all of the measures share variance with partner violence.
Table 2 also shows that criminal histories share variance or are associated with childhood
Discussion
Consistent with past research, the results of this study demonstrate that child victimization and partner violence are related (Button, 2008, Payne and Gainey, 2005, Widom, 1989). Self-control, however, was not related to child victimization, which tacitly suggests that this form of bad parenting (harming a child) does not necessarily result in a low self-control. In terms of criminal history, those who reported committing other acts were also more likely to report domestic violence.
References (51)
- et al.
Self-control, risk lifestyles, and situation
Journal of Criminal Justice
(2007) - et al.
The effects of classroom characteristics on low self-control
Journal of Criminal Justice
(2008) - et al.
On the relationship between gender, power control, self-control, and crime
Journal of Criminal Justice
(2005) - et al.
Awareness and detection of the co-occurrence of interparental violence and child abuse: Child welfare worker's perspective
Children and Youth Services Review
(2006) Patterns of arrest in domestic violence encounters: Identifying a police decision-making model
Journal of Criminal Justice
(1999)Beyond parenting: An examination of the etiology of self-control
Journal of Criminal Justice
(2008)Domestic violence and criminal justice training needs of social workers
Journal of Criminal Justice
(2008)Do criminal offenders specialize in crime types?
Applied and Preventive Psychology
(1997)- et al.
Evaluating the dimensionality of invariance of ‘low self-control.’
Journal of Quantitative Criminology
(1999) - et al.
Genetics and environmental influences on levels of self-control and delinquent peer affiliation
Criminal Justice and Behavior
(2009)
Social disadvantage and family violence
American Journal of Criminal Justice
An analysis of the self-control and criminal versatility of gang and dating violence offenders
Violence and Victims
Elderly abuse in domestic settings
Journal of Gerontological Social Work
Silent suffering: A case study of elder abuse and neglect
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
A general test of self-control theory
International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology
Self-control behind bars: A validation study of the Grasmick et al. scale
Justice Quarterly
Victimology
The overlap between child maltreatment and woman battering
Violence Against Women
Making your home a shelter
British Journal of Criminology
Risky lifestyles, routine activities, and the general theory of crime
Justice Quarterly
A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of using structural equation modeling
Criminal Justice and Behavior
Parental management and self-control: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
A case comparison analysis of elder abuse and neglect
International Journal of Aging and Human Development
A General Theory of Crime
Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime
Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency
Cited by (25)
Climate, aggression, and violence (CLASH): a cultural-evolutionary approach
2018, Current Opinion in PsychologyCitation Excerpt :The CLASH model further outlines that future-orientation and self-control are important determinants of inhibiting aggression and violence, and therefore plausible mediators of the effects of average and seasonal variation in temperature on aggression and violence (Proposition 2). Much evidence shows that aggression and violence often start when self-control stops [19–24]; and that lack of self-control is one of the ‘strongest known correlates of crime’ [25], especially violent crime [26]. Likewise, an abundance of research has demonstrated the empirical relationships between greater future-orientation and less aggression and violence [27–32].
Desistance from intimate partner violence: A critical review
2013, Aggression and Violent BehaviorCitation Excerpt :For example, it is unclear why self-control and propensity have not been examined, particularly as these have both been proposed as risk factors for violence and used to explain why people behave violently (e.g., Bouffard, 2010; DeLisi & Vaughn, 2008; Gottfredson, 2007; Sellers, 1999; Vaughn, DeLisi, Beaver, & Wright, 2009; Winstok, 2009). More specifically self-control theory is growing in credibility in the area of partner violence with those who abuse being identified as having characteristics associated with low self-control (Payne, Higgins, & Blackwell, 2010). Only two studies have examined the role of marriage in the desistance process from IPV (Johnson, 2003; Wooldredge & Thistlethwaite, 2006); and as the findings are contradictory this needs to be examined further.
New frontiers in criminal careers research, 2000-2011: A state-of-the-art review
2011, Journal of Criminal JusticeCitation Excerpt :Using data from a statewide sample of institutionalized delinquents, they found that those scoring 1 SD above the mean on a low self-control scale were over five times more likely to become a career criminal. Others have intimated that self-control is a potentially important moderator of criminal careers over time, finding that persons with very low self-control are more likely to continue offending (Kazemian & Le Blanc, 2004; Morizot & Le Blanc, 2003; Payne, Higgins, & Blackwell, 2010). A criminal careers/life-course perspective has also been used to explore the etiology of self-control above and beyond its theorized socialization origins.
Self-control theory: The Tyrannosaurus rex of criminology is poised to devour criminal justice
2011, Journal of Criminal JusticeThe tripartite tragedy: Alcohol and other drugs, intimate partner violence and child abuse
2019, Children AustraliaSELF-CONTROL, HOMICIDE OFFENDING, AND HOMICIDE VICTIMIZATION
2024, Routledge Handbook of Homicide Studies