Elsevier

Journal of Controlled Release

Volume 328, 10 December 2020, Pages 304-312
Journal of Controlled Release

Impact of blood-brain barrier permeabilization induced by ultrasound associated to microbubbles on the brain delivery and kinetics of cetuximab: An immunoPET study using 89Zr-cetuximab

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.08.047Get rights and content

Highlights

  • FUS and MB significantly increase the delivery of CTX across the BBB.

  • PET is a powerful method to assess the PK of the passage of mAb through the BBB.

  • 89Zr-DFO-CTX was used to follow quantitatively enhanced brain exposure to CTX.

  • ImmunoPET-combined FUS is a clinically relevant strategy for GBM innovative therapy.

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), involved in cell proliferation and migration, is overexpressed in ~50% of glioblastomas. Anti-EGFR based strategies using monoclonal antibodies (mAb) such as cetuximab (CTX) have been proposed for central nervous system (CNS) cancer therapy. However, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) drastically restricts their brain penetration which limits their efficacy for the treatment of glioblastomas. Herein, a longitudinal PET imaging study was performed to assess the relevance and the impact of focused ultrasound (FUS)-mediated BBB permeabilization on the brain exposure to the anti-EGFR mAb CTX over time. For this purpose, FUS permeabilization process with microbubbles was applied on intact BBB mouse brain before the injection of 89Zr-labeled CTX for longitudinal imaging monitoring. FUS induced a dramatic increase in mAb penetration to the brain, 2 times higher compared to the intact BBB. The transfer of 89Zr-CTX from blood to the brain was rendered significant by FUS (kuptake = 1.3 ± 0.23 min−1 with FUS versus kuptake = 0 ± 0.006 min−1 without FUS). FUS allowed significant and prolonged exposure to mAb in the brain parenchyma. This study confirms the potential of FUS as a target delivery method for mAb in CNS.

Introduction

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a key role in essential cellular functions that include proliferation and migration. EGFR signaling mediates oncogenic progression and metastasis in several human malignancies including peripheral and CNS cancers such as glioma [1] [2]. EGFR vIII (deletions of exons 2–7) is the most prevalent mutation observed for EGFR. EGFR vIII is expressed in ~50% of glioblastomas which amplifies the expression of the wild-type protein [3]. Overexpression of EGFR is associated with poor prognosis in glioma patients [4]. The EGFR pathway is therefore regarded as a promising therapeutic target against CNS malignancies. In peripheral cancer, anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were shown to inhibit cell proliferation, enhance apoptosis, and reduce angiogenesis, invasiveness and metastasis [5]. Anti-EGFR mAbs such as cetuximab (CTX) are active against EGFR vIII and prevent the binding of endogenous ligand [6]. Although anti-EGFR mAbs show favorable effects in colorectal, head and neck and non-small cell lung cancers, clinical trials using CTX in patients with glioblastoma did not show significant improvement over standard of care regimens [7,8]. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is the main obstacle limiting the passage of therapeutics into the brain [9]. Insufficient exposure of CNS tumors to CTX across the BBB is widely assumed to explain the limited therapeutic efficacy.

For glioma, the abnormal tumor vasculature issued from the overproduction of proangiogenic factors leads to a compromised blood-tumor barrier (BTB) which is assumed to allow the extravasation of small and large molecules [10]. However, in reality, the penetration of drugs into the compromised BTB is very low, leading to inefficient tumor treatment. In early stages of glioblastoma (GBM), tumor own vasculature is not yet very well developed and the BTB is apparently not disrupted. At theses stages, BTB resembles the BBB and prevents efficient passage of cancer therapeutics, including small molecules and antibodies [11]. Moreover as glioma progresses, BTB presents some degree of heterogeneity i.e. all glioma have clinically significant regions of tumor with an intact BBB limiting the diffusion of treatment [12,13]. As mAb can be blocked from reaching the areas where the BBB remained intact, there is a clear need for strategies that can deliver immunotherapeutic agents into tumors.

The reigning paradigm to overcome this blockage shifted to the establishment of a safe and effective method to improve the brain delivery of mAb. Recent preclinical and clinical studies based on osmotic BBB disruption using intra-arterial mannitol infusion provided encouraging results in terms of improved drug delivery and safety, nevertheless these methods do not allow for controlled and localized BBB permeabilization [14]. The combination of injected microbubbles with low intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) is the most advanced method for controlled, minimally-invasive and transient BBB disruption in vivo [[15], [16], [17]]. Low acoustic pressures, produced by FUS, induce microbubble oscillations (alternation of expansion and shrinkage of microbubbles) near the vessel wall that can result in tight junction loosening due to local stress via push-pull mechanisms or microstreaming [18]. In preclinical model, FUS was recently shown to lead to a 3.5 fold increase in the brain concentrations of mAb [19]. However, current methods used to quantify drug concentrations in the brain are invasive or destructive (mass spectrometry, Elisa assay, HPLC). Non-invasive imaging technique such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET) have therefore been developed to address the brain uptake of labeled mAbs, thus paving the way for the translational study of the neuropharmacokinetics of biologics [20,21]. However, to our knowledge, no in vivo imaging was proposed to study brain mAb concentrations over a prolonged time to provide an in-depth understanding of the neuropharmacokinetics and overall brain exposure to mAbs in vivo.

In the present study, the immunoPET paradigm was used to evaluate over time (up to 1 week) the impact of FUS-induced BBB opening on the delivery of CTX to the whole brain in mice with intact BBB. We used the long half-life (t1/2 = 78.4 h) radionuclide zirconium 89 (89Zr) which is relevant to the biological half-life of mAbs. In this work, kinetic modeling of the brain delivery of 89Zr-CTX was performed to describe the initial transfer rate of CTX across the BBB and to address its retention by the brain over time.

We have found that FUS can increase significantly the uptake and the transfer rate of labeled mAb. Permeabilized 89Zr-DFO-CTX stayed at the proximity of the FUS field for up to 72 h which further consolidate the rationale of using FUS as a controlled delivery method and 89Zr PET imaging as a suitable monitoring technique.

Section snippets

Materials

[89Zr]Zr-oxalic acid was purchased from PerkinElmer (Netherlands). Erbitux (Cetuximab 5 mg/mL) was purchased from Merck (Belgium). p-isothiocyanatobenzyldesferrioxamine (p-NCS-Bz-DFO) was purchased from Chematech (Dijon, France). Ectodomain of human and murine EGFR was obtained from Sino Biological Inc. (Beijing, China). Sodium bicarbonate, sodium acetate, gentisic acid, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). PD-10 desalting columns and iTLC-SG glass microfiber

The relevance of using CTX in a mouse model for assessing the effect of FUS to increase mAb diffusion through BBB

Correct interpretation of the brain kinetics of a mAb requires information regarding its specific and/or nonspecific binding to target tissues. CTX is a chimeric monoclonal antibody where the variable regions of immunoglobulins have a murine origin [28]. Previous studies suggested a low binding on murine EGFR, specifically with NMRI mouse by competitive binding assays [29]. However, binding kinetic constants in a direct binding assay remained to be determined. KD of CTX for human EGFR was

Discussion

EGFR is one of the major target for cancer therapy in a large variety of cancers [31]. Despite some promising studies proposing EGFR-targeting therapies such as small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors or mAbs with CTX, the potential of these agents against glioblastoma has been unfulfilled [32]. One of the reasons for the resistance of glioblastoma cells to treatments might be the limited diffusion of molecules in general and biologics in particular across the BBB that has been

Conclusion

Our results show the impact of FUS-induced transient BBB permeation on the delivery of CTX across the BBB and subsequent brain exposure. To this end, we used pharmacokinetic in vivo imaging making the best from quantitative capacity of PET and long half-life 89Zr labeled CTX. FUS induced a drastic increase in the penetration of CTX to the brain followed by a low diffusion of the mAb within the brain parenchyma. Our results show the relevance for FUS technology to enable sufficient and targeted

Credit author statement

Conceptualization: VLT, AN, NT, BL, CT; Formal analysis: VLT, AN, HN, NT, BL, AW, BK, CT; Funding acquisition: CT; Investigation: VLT, AN, CM, BJ, AB, ASC, HN, AW, BK, CT; Methodology: VLT, AN, CT; Resources: BL, CT; Supervision: CT; Validation: NT, BL, CT; Visualization: NT, BL, CT; Writing - original draft: VLT, AN, HN, NT, BL, CT; Writing - review & editing: CM, BJ, AB, ASC, AW, BK.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by CEA (Bottom-up program), France Life Imaging network (grant ANR-11-INBS-0006) and the Research Foundation Against Cancer, ARC.

References (51)

  • E.D. Lobo et al.

    Antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2004)
  • P.R. Cooper et al.

    Efflux of monoclonal antibodies from rat brain by neonatal fc receptor, FcRn

    Brain Res.

    (2013)
  • D.J. Wolak et al.

    Probing the extracellular diffusion of antibodies in brain using in vivo integrative optical imaging and ex vivo fluorescence imaging

    J. Control. Release

    (2015)
  • S. Sigismund et al.

    Emerging functions of the EGFR in cancer

    Mol. Oncol.

    (2018)
  • T. Mitsudomi et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor in relation to tumor development: EGFR gene and cancer

    FEBS J.

    (2010)
  • A. Shergalis et al.

    Current challenges and opportunities in treating glioblastoma

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (2018)
  • Z. An et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma (GBM): signaling pathways and targeted therapies

    Oncogene.

    (2018)
  • H. Xu et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor in glioblastoma

    Oncol. Lett.

    (2017)
  • B. Hasselbalch et al.

    Cetuximab, bevacizumab, and irinotecan for patients with primary glioblastoma and progression after radiation therapy and temozolomide: a phase II trial

    Neuro-Oncol.

    (2010)
  • U.H. Weidle et al.

    The blood–brain barrier challenge for the treatment of brain cancer, secondary brain metastases, and neurological diseases

    Cancer Genomics Proteomics

    (2015)
  • J. Jászai et al.

    Trends and challenges in tumor anti-angiogenic therapies

    Cells.

    (2019)
  • C.D. Arvanitis et al.

    The blood–brain barrier and blood–tumour barrier in brain tumours and metastases

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2020)
  • A. D’Alessio et al.

    Pathological and molecular features of glioblastoma and its peritumoral tissue

    Cancers.

    (2019)
  • W.G. Lesniak et al.

    PET imaging of intra-arterial 89Zr bevacizumab in mice with and without osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier: distinct advantage of intra-arterial delivery

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (2018)
  • K. Hynynen et al.

    Noninvasive MR imaging–guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits

    Radiology.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Improving the efficacy of anti-EGFR drugs in GBM: Where we are going?

      2023, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Reviews on Cancer
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    co first authors. These authors have contributed equally to the experimental design and paper writing.

    View full text