Review
Protein-based nanocarriers as promising drug and gene delivery systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.036Get rights and content

Abstract

Among the available potential colloidal drug carrier systems, protein-based nanocarriers are particularly interesting. Meeting requirements such as low cytotoxicity, abundant renewable sources, high drug binding capacity and significant uptake into the targeted cells, protein-based nanocarriers represent promising candidates for efficient drug and gene delivery. Moreover, the unique protein structure offers the possibility of site-specific drug conjugation and targeting using various ligands modifying the surface of protein nanocarriers. The current review highlights the main advances achieved in utilizing protein nanocarriers as natural vehicles for drug and gene delivery tasks with respect to types, advantages, limitations, formulation aspects as well as the major outcomes of the in vitro and in vivo investigations. The recently emerged technologies in the formulation of protein nanocarriers including using recombinant proteins as alternatives to native ones and new non-toxic crosslinkers as alternatives to the toxic chemical crosslinkers are also discussed.

Introduction

In recent years, there has been a considerable interest in the development of novel drug delivery systems using nanotechnology [1], [2]. Polymeric materials used for preparing nanoparticles for drug delivery must be at least biocompatible and best biodegradable. The use of natural polymers has been very well described in the literature for fabrication of nanoparticles [3], [4]. Obviously, there is growing interest in developing protein nanocarriers as GRAS (generally regarded as safe) drug delivery devices due to their exceptional characteristics, namely biodegradability, nonantigenicity, high nutritional value, abundant renewable sources and extraordinary binding capacity of various drugs. Proteins have the possibility of less opsonization by the reticuloendothelial system (RES) through an aqueous steric barrier in addition to their excellent functional properties including emulsification, gelation, foaming and water binding capacity [5], [6], [7]. Moreover, protein nanoparticles can be easily prepared and scaled up during manufacture [6], [7].

Owing to multiple functional groups in the primary sequences of polypeptides, protein nanoparticles can be exploited to create different interactions with therapeutic compounds and subsequently form three-dimensional networks offering a variety of possibilities for reversible binding of active molecules, protecting them in a matrix as well as specific targeting to the site of action [6], [7]. Furthermore, protein nanoparticles possess acceptability as metabolizable naturally occurring components. Hydrolysis of proteins by digestive enzymes generates bioactive peptides that may exert a number of physiological effects in vivo [5]. This review embodies an in-depth discussion of the nanoparticulate drug delivery systems that make use of proteins as drug carriers.

Section snippets

Animal proteins

Animal proteins represent good raw materials since they have the advantages of synthetic polymers and the advantages of absorbability and low toxicity of the degradation end products [8].

Plant proteins

Nanoparticulate carriers from vegetal proteins represent a new approach which presents some advantages [94]. In contrast to drug delivery using hydrophilic animal proteins, hydrophobic plant proteins such as zein and gliadin have the capability of yielding sustained drug release [95]. Due to their high hydrophobicity, the nanoparticles may not need any further chemical or physical treatment to harden them thus avoiding the toxic chemical crosslinkers [94]. They are less expensive than animal

Advantages and pharmaceutical applications

Proteins are posed as the natural counterpart to synthetic polymers for the development of nanoparticles. They offer several advantages over synthetic polymers being GRAS drug delivery devices with high nutritional value and abundant renewable sources. As related to safety, they are metabolizable in vivo by digestive enzymes into innocuous peptides whereas synthetic polymers may give harmful degradation products. Additionally, protein nanoparticles exhibit high loading capacity of various drugs

Drawbacks and challenges

Proteins as natural polymers are heterogeneous mixtures of different sizes with a wide range of molecular weights thus producing heterogeneous nanoparticle size distribution and exhibiting batch-to-batch variation [137]. This may hinder the scaling-up process of protein nanoparticle preparation for industrial application. An interesting strategy to overcome this drawback is the recombinant protein technology. The monodispersity and precisely defined properties of recombinant proteins as well as

Future perspectives

Studies will continue to further improve delivery of drugs using protein nanocarriers. Special emphasis seems to be given for using recombinant protein-based nanoparticles for drug delivery as alternatives to native ones. Few studies investigating such approach were reported for recombinant HSA [138], recombinant gelatin [28], [139] and elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) nanoparticles [82]. Additionally, studies will continue to further investigate new safe crosslinkers of protein nanoparticles

References (141)

  • J.C. Zillies et al.

    Formulation development of freeze-dried oligonucleotide-loaded gelatin nanoparticles

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2008)
  • A.K. Gupta et al.

    Effect of cellular uptake of gelatin nanoparticles on adhesion, morphology and cytoskeleton organization of human fibroblasts

    J. Control. Release

    (2004)
  • Y.-W. Won et al.

    Recombinant human gelatin nanoparticles as a protein drug carrier

    J. Control. Release

    (2008)
  • M.D. Bhavsar et al.

    Gastrointestinal distribution and in vivo gene transfection studies with nanoparticles-in-microsphere oral system (NiMOS)

    J. Control. Release

    (2007)
  • C. Kriegel et al.

    Oral TNF-α gene silencing using a polymeric microsphere-based delivery system for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

    J. Control. Release

    (2011)
  • D. Ding et al.

    Cisplatin-loaded gelatin-poly(acrylic acid) nanoparticles: synthesis, antitumor efficiency in vivo and penetration in tumors

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2011)
  • C.H. Lee et al.

    Biomedical applications of collagen

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2001)
  • W. Friess

    Collagen—biomaterial for drug delivery

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (1998)
  • X. Niu et al.

    Porous nano-HA/collagen/PLLA scaffold containing chitosan microspheres for controlled delivery of synthetic peptide derived from BMP-2

    J. Control. Release

    (2009)
  • F. Kratz

    Albumin as a drug carrier: design of prodrugs, drug conjugates and nanoparticles

    J. Control. Release

    (2008)
  • M. Dadparvar et al.

    HI 6 human serum albumin nanoparticles—development and transport over an in vitro blood–brain barrier model

    Toxicol. Lett.

    (2011)
  • A. Arnedo et al.

    Albumin nanoparticles improved the stability, nuclear accumulation and anticytomegaloviral activity of a phosphodiester oligonucleotide

    J. Control. Release

    (2004)
  • J. Weyermann et al.

    Albumin–protamine–oligonucleotide-nanoparticles as a new antisense delivery system. Part 2: cellular uptake and effect

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2005)
  • Y.D. Livney

    Milk proteins as vehicles for bioactives

    Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2010)
  • D.S. Horne

    Casein micelle structure: models and muddles

    Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2006)
  • P. Zimet et al.

    Re-assembled casein micelles and casein nanoparticles as nano-vehicles for ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2011)
  • A. Shapira et al.

    β-casein‐based nanovehicles for oral delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs: drug–protein interactions and mitoxantrone loading capacity

    Nanomedicine

    (2010)
  • M. Esmaili et al.

    Beta casein–micelle as a nano vehicle for solubility enhancement of curcumin; food industry application

    LWT- Food Sci. Technol.

    (2011)
  • S. Gunasekaran et al.

    Use of whey proteins for encapsulation and controlled delivery applications

    J. Food Eng.

    (2007)
  • A. Shpigelman et al.

    Thermally-induced protein polyphenol co‐assemblies: beta lactoglobulin-based nanocomplexes as protective nanovehicles for EGCG

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2010)
  • H.J. Giroux et al.

    Preparation of nanoparticles from denatured whey protein by pH-cycling treatment

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2010)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Microemulsions as nanoreactors to produce whey protein nanoparticles with enhanced heat stability by thermal pretreatment

    Food Chem.

    (2010)
  • M. Girard et al.

    Interbiopolymer complexing between β-lactoglobulin and low- and high-methoxylated pectin measured by potentiometric titration and ultrafiltration

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2002)
  • L.Y. Zhang et al.

    Macromolecular conjugate based particulates: preparation, characterization and evaluation of controlled release properties

    Eur. Polym. J.

    (2009)
  • K. Numata et al.

    Silk-based delivery systems of bioactive molecules

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2010)
  • G.H. Altman et al.

    Silk-based biomaterials

    Biomaterials

    (2003)
  • A.S. Lammel et al.

    Controlling silk fibroin particle features for drug delivery

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • J. Kundu et al.

    Silk fibroin nanoparticles for cellular uptake and control release

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2010)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Silk nanospheres and microspheres from silk/pva blend films for drug delivery

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • E.R. Wright et al.

    Self-assembly of block copolymers derived from elastin-mimetic polypeptide sequences

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2002)
  • J.R. McDaniel et al.

    Drug delivery to solid tumors by elastin-like polypeptides

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2010)
  • W.E. Liu et al.

    Tumor accumulation, degradation and pharmacokinetics of elastin-like polypeptides in nude mice

    J. Control. Release

    (2006)
  • R. Herrero-Vanrell et al.

    Self-assembled particles of an elastin-like polymer as vehicles for controlled drug release

    J. Control. Release

    (2005)
  • P.C. Bessa et al.

    Thermoresponsive self-assembled elastin-based nanoparticles for delivery of BMPs

    J. Control. Release

    (2010)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Thermo-targeted drug delivery of geldanamycin to hyperthermic tumor margins with diblock elastin-based biopolymers

    J. Control. Release

    (2011)
  • D.Y. Furgeson et al.

    Structural optimization of a “smart” doxorubicin–polypeptide conjugate for thermally targeted delivery to solid tumors

    J. Control. Release

    (2006)
  • U.M. Krishna et al.

    Hydrazone self-crosslinking of multiphase elastin-like block copolymer networks

    Acta Biomater.

    (2012)
  • R.E. Sallach et al.

    Elastin mimetic protein polymers capable of physical and chemical crosslinking

    Biomaterials

    (2009)
  • I. Ezpeleta et al.

    Gliadin nanoparticles for the controlled release of all-transretinoic acid

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1996)
  • L.F. Lai et al.

    Preparation of new 5-fluorouracil-loaded zein nanoparticles for liver targeting

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (689)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text