ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Controlled Release
Volume 104, Issue 1, 5 May 2005, Pages 203-211
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (196 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.01.011    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery: Kinetics of plasmid internalization and gene expression

Sophie Mehier-Humberta, b, Thierry Bettingerb, Feng Yanb and Richard H. Guya, c, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aUniversity of Geneva, School of Pharmacy and Biopharmacy, 30 Quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland bBracco Research SA, Department of Novel Agents Research, 31 route de la Galaise, CH-1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland cUniversity of Bath, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, England

Received 24 August 2004; 
accepted 20 January 2005. 
Available online 2 March 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Sonoporation is an approach that can be used to transfer DNA or drugs into cells. However, very little is known about the mechanism of ultrasound-mediated membrane permeabilization. In this investigation, DNA transport post-sonoporation and the subsequent plasmid internalization and protein expression kinetics have been studied. Using a plasmid encoding for the green fluorescent protein (GFP), labelled or not with an intercalating agent (YOYO-1), it was found that, as compared to lipofection that requires endocytosis, sonoporation allowed a rapid and direct transfer of naked DNA into the cell cytoplasm probably via ultrasound-induced pores in the membrane. The kinetics of protein expression were significantly faster for sonoporation than for lipofection, the mechanism of which requires endocytosis. However, unprotected DNA in the cytoplasm could be degraded by resident cytosolic DNases, thereby decreasing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery efficiency.

Keywords: Gene delivery; Sonoporation; Mechanism; Microbubbles; Lipofection

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Cell culture
2.2. Ultrasound exposure
2.3. Liposomal transfection
2.4. Analysis of sonoporation and transfection efficacy
2.5. Statistical analysis
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Plasmid internalization
3.2. Kinetics of gene expression
4. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References







 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.