ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
Volume 86, Issues 3-4, 10 August 2006, Pages 239-261
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (660 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.03.005    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Recharge processes drive sulfate reduction in an alluvial aquifer contaminated with landfill leachate

Martha A. Scholla, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Isabelle M. Cozzarellia and Scott C. Christensonb

aU.S. Geological Survey, 431 National Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA bU.S. Geological Survey, 202 NW 66th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73116, USA

Received 19 August 2005; 
revised 23 December 2005; 
accepted 16 March 2006. 
Available online 4 May 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Natural attenuation of contaminants in groundwater depends on an adequate supply of electron acceptors to stimulate biodegradation. In an alluvial aquifer contaminated with leachate from an unlined municipal landfill, the mechanism of recharge infiltration was investigated as a source of electron acceptors. Water samples were collected monthly at closely spaced intervals in the top 2 m of the saturated zone from a leachate-contaminated well and an uncontaminated well, and analyzed for δ18O, δ2H, non-volatile dissolved organic carbon (NVDOC), SO42−, NO3 and Cl. Monthly recharge amounts were quantified using the offset of the δ18O or δ2H from the local meteoric water line as a parameter to distinguish water types, as evaporation and methanogenesis caused isotopic enrichment in waters from different sources. Presence of dissolved SO42− in the top 1 to 2 m of the saturated zone was associated with recharge; SO42− averaged 2.2 mM, with maximum concentrations of 15 mM. Nitrate was observed near the water table at the contaminated site at concentrations up to 4.6 mM. Temporal monitoring of δ2H and SO42− showed that vertical transport of recharge carried SO42− to depths up to 1.75 m below the water table, supplying an additional electron acceptor to the predominantly methanogenic leachate plume. Measurements of δ34S in SO42− indicated both SO42− reduction and sulfide oxidation were occurring in the aquifer. Depth-integrated net SO42− reduction rates, calculated using the natural Cl gradient as a conservative tracer, ranged from 7.5 × 10− 3 to 0.61 mM·d− 1 (over various depth intervals from 0.45 to 1.75 m). Sulfate reduction occurred at both the contaminated and uncontaminated sites; however, median SO42− reduction rates were higher at the contaminated site. Although estimated SO42− reduction rates are relatively high, significant decreases in NVDOC were not observed at the contaminated site. Organic compounds more labile than the leachate NVDOC may be present in the root zone, and SO42− reduction may be coupled to methane oxidation. The results show that sulfur (and possibly nitrogen) redox processes within the top 2 m of the aquifer are directly related to recharge timing and seasonal water level changes in the aquifer. The results suggest that SO42− reduction associated with the infiltration of recharge may be a significant factor affecting natural attenuation of contaminants in alluvial aquifers.

Keywords: Natural attenuation; Ground-water recharge; Sulfate; Nitrate; Riparian environment; Geochemistry; Landfill

Article Outline

1. Introduction
1.1. Site description
2. Methods
2.1. Sampling and analyses
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Recharge determination with δ18O and δ2H
3.2. Observations of sulfate and nitrate in the aquifer
3.3. δ34S ratios in sulfate
3.4. Sulfate in groundwater correlates with recharge
3.5. Sulfate reduction rates by the chloride gradient method
3.6. Estimated leachate mitigation
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References







 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.