A carbon emission evaluation model for a container terminal
Introduction
South Korea has had of the fastest growing economies in recent history, largely due to growth in manufacturing and the high-tech industry. It is also one of the largest producers of carbon emissions in the world. In recent years, the South Korean government has realized its obligation to do its part to offset global warming and has made an effort commitment to decrease carbon dioxide emission (CO2) production in the nation’s major industries (Sonnenschein and Mundaca, 2015). Specific targets have been set for each sector to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by the year 2030.
Of the major industries, the transportation sector accounts for 17.9% of the nation’s total energy consumption and 12.6% of the total carbon dioxide emissions. The government has assigned this sector a carbon emission reduction target of up to 34.2 million ton by the year 2030 (ME, 2014). Containers, which can be used to transport goods via rail, ship, and truck, have become common globally. In South Korea, the container trade is one of the most important modes of transport and will continue to contribute a large amount of carbon emissions in the South Korean transportation sector.
Export and import containers are handled in a container terminal in two stages: a vessel operation and a receiving and delivery operation (Lee and Kim, 2010). The carbon emissions in the vessel operation are typically generated by a container ship and yard equipment, and in the receiving and delivery operation by a container trailer. In the vessel operation, the container loading and unloading activity associated with a container ship and yard equipment also produce the carbon emissions. In the receiving and delivery operation, the carbon emissions are generated from the container trailer, where containers are transported between the container terminal and the port hinterland facility, or vice versa.
Several research studies have been conducted to investigate air emissions generated from various activities in the seaport sector. Some studies investigated various vessel types to determine the impact of vessel movements and vessel operation modes on air emissions in ports (Goldsworthy and Goldsworthy, 2015), while others looked at vessels at berth to estimate the production of air emission in their operation while in ports (Hulskotte and Denier van der Gon, 2010). Several studies assessed various emissions of vessels – nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter – in the cases of Greece (Tzannatos, 2010), Italy (Lucialli et al., 2007), Norway (López-Aparicio et al., 2017), Portugal (Nunes et al., 2017), and Turkey (Deniz and Kilic, 2010). Since the existing studies of vessels focused solely on air emissions generated from the vessel maneuvering in port areas and on the vessel at berth, it has not been possible to comprehensively estimate the total air emissions generated in port areas.
The port operation generates a large amount of emissions in the loading, unloading, and transporting of containers in the yard. Some studies analyzed the air emissions generated from the truck (Berechman and Tseng, 2012), yard tractor (Yu et al., 2017), gantry crane (Liu et al., 2011) and quay cranes (Liu and Ge, 2017) in a port operation in terms of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, volatile organic compounds, and particulate matter. A study by Gibbs and colleagues (2014) found that the transportation activity from a hinterland to a port also contributed a large amount of environmental impact, as did the port operation in the yard. A shortcoming of these studies is that they provided only the total amount of air emissions related to the port operation, but not the vessel operation.
In the South Korean context, some research studies investigated various air emissions – greenhouse gas, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide, volatile organic compound, and particulate matter – of port vessel operations (Chang et al., 2013) and of different vessel types (Song and Shon, 2014). These studies did not consider port operations, so the results do not provide the total amounts of air emissions generated in the port. One study investigated greenhouse gas emissions of both vessel operation and port operation from the year 2000 to the year 2007 (Shin and Cheong, 2011) but did not consider the greenhouse gas emitted from the vessel at berth, which is an important activity of vessel operation.
Little research has been conducted to assess the carbon emissions of a container terminal in terms of container handling processes in the South Korean context (Liao et al., 2010). A review of the relevant existing literature indicated that most studies failed to include the entire processes in ports related to a container vessel – a vessel operation, a receiving and delivery operation to a container trailer, and a handling and storage operation with yard equipment – in the estimation of carbon production in port. Few studies used a system dynamics approach to consider the carbon emission reduction target issues in the container terminal.
To address the research gap in studies of carbon emission production in a container terminal, this study developed a system dynamics model to comprehensively analyze carbon emission equivalent (CO2-e) amounts generated from all of the activities of container transportation in the container terminal, from container trailer to container ship. Based on the analyzed annual carbon emission amounts, this study determined the required amount of carbon emission reduction for container terminals, while satisfying the specific carbon emission reduction target assigned by the South Korean government.
Based on the results of this study, government officials will be able to set environmental policies for green container terminals, while satisfying the assigned specific carbon reduction target by the year 2030. The proposed methodology can also be applied to evaluate the carbon emissions generated from all types of ports and further estimate the required reduction amount of carbon emissions in the overall South Korean sea transportation sector.
Section snippets
Methodology
This study analyzed the carbon emissions produced during the entire gamut of container handling processes at a container terminal in South Korea. It also developed a carbon emission evaluation model to measure the required amount of carbon emission reduction using a system dynamics approach. This study considered the carbon pollutants generated during two operations of a container terminal – a vessel operation of a container ship and a receiving and delivery operation of a container trailer.
Results
This study aimed to use the developed system dynamics model to estimate the total carbon emissions generated from container terminal processes and to calculate the required amount of carbon emission reduction at the specific reduction target assigned by the South Korean government for the year 2030. In the next step, this study examined the effects of the uncertain container traffic volume on the total carbon emissions and the carbon emission reduction amount through a parameter sensitivity
Discussion
Before making a plan to mitigate the environmental impacts of a container terminal, it is imperative to investigate the carbon emission amounts generated from all of the processes in the container terminal. This study, using the developed carbon emission evaluation model, analyzed the carbon emission amounts of each process and estimated the carbon emission reduction amounts in the container terminal required to achieve the national carbon emission reduction target in South Korea by the year
Conclusion
The maritime transportation sector, one of the most important sectors in the South Korean transportation industry, is expected to play a critical role in decreasing that country’s total carbon emission amount. To date, little research has been conducted to estimate the carbon emission equivalent produced from the entire range of activities in a container terminal. Thus, this study makes several contributions to the field and fills this research gap. First, this study provided the carbon
References (39)
- et al.
Estimating the environmental costs of port related emissions: the Case of Kaohiung
Transport. Res. Part D
(2012) - et al.
Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from port vessel operations at the Port of Incheon
Transport. Res. Part D
(2013) - et al.
The role of sea ports in end-to-end maritime transport chain emissions
Energy Pol.
(2014) - et al.
Modeling of ship engine exhaust emissions in ports and extensive coastal waters based on terrestrial AIS data – an Australian case study
Environ. Model. Software
(2015) - et al.
Fuel consumption and associated emissions from seagoing ships at berth derived from an on-board survey
Atmos. Environ.
(2010) - et al.
Dynamic analysis of the effects of mortgage-lending policies in a real estate market
Math. Comput. Model.
(2013) - et al.
Comparison and evaluation of various cycle-time models for yard cranes in container terminals
Int. J. Prod. Econ.
(2010) - et al.
The impact of an emerging port on the carbon dioxide emissions of inland container transport: an empirical study of Taipei port
Energy Pol.
(2010) - et al.
Shipping emissions in a Nordic port: assessment of mitigation strategies
Transport. Res. Part D
(2017) - et al.
Harbour of Ravenna: the contribution of harbor traffic to air quality
Atmos. Environ.
(2007)
Assessment of shipping emissions on four ports of Portugal
Environ. Pollut.
The influence of new carbon emission abatement goals on the truck-freight transportation sector in South Korea
J. Clean. Prod.
The effect of new carbon emission reduction goals on an apartment building in South Korea
Energy Build.
Ship emissions and their externalities for Greece
Atmos. Environ.
Analysis of dynamic effects on seaports adopting seaport security
Transport. Res. Part A
CO2 emission evaluation of yard tractors during loading at container terminals
Transport. Res. Part D
Understanding the complexity of container terminal operation through the development of system dynamics model
Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. (IJSTL)
Improving resilience of critical infrastructure systems post-disaster
J. Transp. Res. Board
Estimation and assessment of shipping emissions in the region of Ambarli Port, Turkey
Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy
Cited by (58)
Investigating the efficiency of container terminals through a network DEA cross efficiency approach
2024, Research in Transportation Business and ManagementThe role of hydrogen as enabler of industrial port area decarbonization
2024, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsThrough-life stochastic carbon emission assessment and optimisation for critical assets
2023, Journal of Cleaner ProductionEstimation methods and reduction strategies of port carbon emissions - what literatures say?
2023, Marine Pollution BulletinAnalyzing the development of competition and cooperation among ocean carriers considering the impact of carbon tax policy
2023, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review