New Research Papers
Focus on Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Applicability of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Trials to Real-World Clinical Practice: Findings From EXTEND-CoreValve

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.006Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the applicability of pivotal transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) trials to the real-world population of Medicare patients undergoing TAVR.

Background

It is unclear whether randomized controlled trial results of novel cardiovascular devices apply to patients encountered in clinical practice.

Methods

Characteristics of patients enrolled in the U.S. CoreValve pivotal trials were compared with those of the population of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent TAVR in U.S. clinical practice between November 2, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Inverse probability weighting was used to reweight the trial cohort on the basis of Medicare patient characteristics, and a “real-world” treatment effect was estimated.

Results

A total of 2,026 patients underwent TAVR in the U.S. CoreValve pivotal trials, and 135,112 patients underwent TAVR in the Medicare cohort. Trial patients were mostly similar to real-world patients at baseline, though trial patients were more likely to have hypertension (50% vs 39%) and coagulopathy (25% vs 17%), whereas real-world patients were more likely to have congestive heart failure (75% vs 68%) and frailty. The estimated real-world treatment effect of TAVR was an 11.4% absolute reduction in death or stroke (95% CI: 7.50%-14.92%) and an 8.7% absolute reduction in death (95% CI: 5.20%-12.32%) at 1 year with TAVR compared with conventional therapy (surgical aortic valve replacement for intermediate- and high-risk patients and medical therapy for extreme-risk patients).

Conclusions

The trial and real-world populations were mostly similar, with some notable differences. Nevertheless, the extrapolated real-world treatment effect was at least as high as the observed trial treatment effect, suggesting that the absolute benefit of TAVR in clinical trials is similar to the benefit of TAVR in the U.S. real-world setting.

Key Words

generalizability
real world
TAVR

Abbreviations and Acronyms

CMS
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
IPW
inverse probability weighting
MedPAR
Medicare Provider and Review
PROM
Predicted Risk of Mortality
RCT
randomized controlled trial
SAVR
surgical aortic valve replacement
STS
Society of Thoracic Surgeons
TAVR
transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Cited by (0)

The authors attest they are in compliance with human studies committees and animal welfare regulations of the authors’ institutions and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, including patient consent where appropriate. For more information, visit the Author Center.