ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Chromatography B
Volume 830, Issue 2, 18 January 2006, Pages 372-376
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (186 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.11.034    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Short communication

Comparison of liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection to liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry for the determination of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in human plasma

I. Kovacevica, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, M. Pokrajaca, B. Miljkovica, D. Jovanovicb and M. Prostranc

aDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro bMilitary Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro cDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro

Received 9 September 2005; 
accepted 11 November 2005. 
Available online 13 December 2005.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

A comparison study on fluoxetine (FL) and norfluoxetine (NORFL) quantitation in human plasma was carried out between the recently developed liquid chromatographic method with fluorescence detection (LC–FLD) and an earlier established liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) laboratory procedure. Comparative method evaluation was based on the analysis of plasma samples obtained from Parkinsonian patients receiving 20 mg of FL per day. The LC–FLD method involves a two-step liquid extraction procedure without any derivatization, followed by direct chromatography on a Zorbax C8 reversed-phase column. The analytical results are discussed in terms of the method validation and the corresponding experimental protocol (r ≥ 0.998; CV < 9%; LOQ 20 μg/l). There was good correlation between FL, as well as NORFL, plasma levels as determined by the LC–MS and LC–FLD techniques (r = 0.9597, N = 16 and r = 0.9852, N = 14 for FL and NORFL, respectively). The results confirm that direct FL/NORFL fluorimetric determination is acceptable for routine use in pharmacokinetic and clinical studies.

Keywords: Fluoxetine; Norfluoxetine; Liquid chromatography; Fluorescence detection; Mass spectrometry; Human plasma; Pharmacokinetic analysis

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Experimental
2.1. Chemicals
2.2. Extraction procedure
2.3. Liquid chromatography
2.4. Assay validation
2.5. Correlation procedure
3. Results and discussion
4. Conclusion
References



Journal of Chromatography B
Volume 830, Issue 2, 18 January 2006, Pages 372-376
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.