ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Joint Bone Spine
Volume 74, Issue 3, May 2007, Pages 240-244
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (112 K)

Article Toolbox
  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.11.004    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS All rights reserved.

Review

Devising global strategies for fracture-risk evaluation

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Patricia Dargent-MolinaCorresponding Author Contact Information, a, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Claude-Laurent Benhamoua, Bernard Corteta, Bruno Suttera and Thierry Thomasa

aINSERM, Unit 149, 16, av. Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94807 Villejuif Cedex, France


Received 21 September 2006; 
accepted 24 November 2006. 
Available online 20 February 2007.

Abstract

Fracture prevention is the goal of osteoporosis treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) has been the main criterion for deciding whether to initiate treatment, which is usually recommended when the BMD is less than −2.5 SDs from the mean in young women. However, the need to base treatment decisions on the overall fracture risk, rather than on BMD values alone, is now increasingly recognized. Several factors predict the fracture risk independently from BMD. Combining these factors to BMD may improve patient selection for osteoporosis therapy. In addition to low BMD values, factors associated with a high fracture risk include advanced age, prior fractures in the patient or family, low body mass index, smoking, glucocorticoid therapy, unfavorable profile of bone turnover markers, and risk factors for falls. There is no consensus yet about the best strategy for using these risk factors to assist in treatment decisions. A collaborative center set up by the World Health Organization is evaluating pooled data from prospective studies in order to better define high-risk patient subsets that are likely to benefit from osteoporosis treatment to prevent fractures. The results will serve to develop clinical guidelines for identifying high-risk patients.

Keywords: Osteoporosis; Fractures; Screening; Risk

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Defining the intervention threshold
3. Relevant risk factors in addition to bone mineral density
4. Defining the best strategy for selecting patients to osteoporosis treatment
5. Conclusion
References

Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +33 1 4559 5005; fax: +33 1 4559 5089.

Joint Bone Spine
Volume 74, Issue 3, May 2007, Pages 240-244
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.