Potential of water surface-floating microalgae for biodiesel production: Floating-biomass and lipid productivities

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.09.015Get rights and content

Microalgae have been accepted as a promising feedstock for biodiesel production owing to their capability of converting solar energy into lipids through photosynthesis. However, the high capital and operating costs, and high energy consumption, are hampering commercialization of microalgal biodiesel. In this study, the surface-floating microalga, strain AVFF007 (tentatively identified as Botryosphaerella sudetica), which naturally forms a biofilm on surfaces, was characterized for use in biodiesel production. The biofilm could be conveniently harvested from the surface of the water by adsorbing onto a polyethylene film. The lipid productivity of strain AVFF007 was 46.3 mg/L/day, allowing direct comparison to lipid productivities of other microalgal species. The moisture content of the surface-floating biomass was 86.0 ± 1.2%, which was much lower than that of the biomass harvested using centrifugation. These results reveal the potential of this surface-floating microalgal species as a biodiesel producer, employing a novel biomass harvesting and dewatering strategy.

Section snippets

Strain and growth conditions

A green microalga species (termed strain AVFF007) found floating naturally on a water surface, was isolated from a freshwater pond in Kyoto, Japan. Strain AVFF007 was maintained in CSi medium (17) under continuous illumination using cool white fluorescent lights. To obtain the floating biomass, the strain AVFF007 was statically inoculated into 40 mL volume plastic cases (size: W50 × D63 × H25 mm, AS ONE, Osaka, Japan) in a desiccator (AS ONE), at an initial cell density of 1 × 105 cells/mL.

Characterization of strain AVFF007

Fig. 1 shows a typical static culture of strain AVFF007 in a glass flask. Most of the cells floated naturally upon the surface of the medium during static cultivation, while a portion of cells settled to the bottom of the medium. The floating cells formed biofilm, the surface of which was completely dry. Static cultivation was essential for the flotation ability of the cells to result in biofilm formation, since biofilms were not observed under well-mixed culture conditions with continuous

Discussion

This study evaluated the feasibility of biodiesel production by a water surface-floating microalga, strain AVFF007, which was tentatively identified as B. sudetica. B. sudetica (UTEX2629) has recently been proposed to be a potentially useful strain for microalgal biomass production (26). However, its ability to float at the surface of water and its possible use for biodiesel production have not been reported. Comparisons between the biomass yields and lipid productivities of strain AVFF007 and

References (30)

  • L.B. Brentner et al.

    Combinatorial life cycle assessment to inform process design of industrial production of algal biodiesel

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2011)
  • T. De Baerdemaeker et al.

    Benchmark study on algae harvesting with backwashable submerged flat panel membranes

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Harvesting of microalgae Scenedesmus sp. using polyvinylidene fluoride microfiltration membrane

    Desalination Water Treat.

    (2012)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Evaluation of an inclined gravity settler for microalgae harvesting

    J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.

    (2014)
  • A. Zenouzi et al.

    Harvesting of microalgae Dunaliella salina using electroflocculation

    J. Agric. Sci. Technol.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Harvesting colonial Microcystis flos-aquae using two-stage filtration: Influence of pre-filtration on harvesting performance

      2020, Separation and Purification Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the harvested Microcystis cells, which contained more than 50% protein and carbohydrate in total dry weight, could be used as biomass resources, such as organic fertilizer, feedstock for biodiesel production, and fish meal [8–11]. Over the past four decades, many techniques, including coagulation–flocculation, sedimentation, flotation, centrifugation, filtration or their combinations have been devised for microalgal harvesting [12–16]. Among these technologies, filtration is commonly considered a promising approach because of the advantages of obtaining high quality biomass, being environmentally compatible, and having a simple operation and ease in scaling up [17–19](Discart et al., 2013).

    • Use of microalgae for the treatment of black and odorous water: Purification effects and optimization of treatment conditions

      2020, Algal Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cyclotella and Navicula were purchased from the Freshwater Algae Culture Collection at the Institute of Hydrobiology (FACHB), and the numbers of these two microalgae are Cyclotella sp. [FACHB-1638] and Navicula pelliculosa [FACHB-2262], respectively. Scenedesmus was cultured in SE medium [13], and CSI medium [14] was used to culture Cyclotella and Navicula. For culturing, 300 mL of the medium was autoclaved (121 °C, 30 min) in a 500-mL Erlenmeyer flask and then cooled to allow for the aseptic inoculation of microalgae.

    • Integration of osmotic shock assisted liquid biphasic system for protein extraction from microalgae Chlorella vulgaris

      2020, Biochemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Besides protein, microalgae also encapsulate lipids and carbohydrate, which are deemed as useful in food, feed and bulk chemical industries [5]. Furthermore, microalgae exhibits high photosynthetic ability [6] with a rapid growth rate and shorter harvesting cycle [7,8]. It also possesses high biomass density and higher degree of disease resistance [9].

    • An energy and resource efficient alkaline flocculation and sedimentation process for harvesting of Chromochloris zofingiensis biomass

      2020, Bioresource Technology Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Harvesting (dewatering) of biomass from the culture medium is considered one of the costlier aspects of microalgal processing as a consequence of very dilute cultures (<0.3% dry weight, DW) and handling of large liquid volumes (Gerardo et al., 2015; Ruiz et al., 2016; Vandamme et al., 2013; Weschler et al., 2014). Further challenges are the small sizes of cells (<50 μm), unfavourable buoyancies (depending on species and biochemical composition) (Hathwaik et al., 2015; Muto et al., 2017), and the negative surface charges of most species which result in electrostatic repulsion and cells remaining suspended (Lama et al., 2016). Thus, effective harvesting needs to be optimised for both algal species and product configuration to minimise energy expenditure.

    • Elemental, morphological and thermal analysis of mixed microalgae species from drain water

      2019, Renewable Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Microalgae are considered as one of the most efficient bioenergy sources like other energy producing terrestrial crops [12–14]. Microalgae conduct photosynthesis process by converting solar energy and CO2 into O2 and complex structured energy content which can be extracted as either liquid fuel like bioethanol, biodiesel and others or solid fuel like microalgae pellets as supplement for coal and mixture with other energy biomass to generate heat and electricity [15–17]. From the last decade, microalgae has been hailed as a versatile bioenergy source prior to producing an enormous array of value added products, oil enrichment up to 80%, prudent usage in diverse aspects, CO2 recycles and waste uptake in heavy metal waste producing industries [18,19].

    • Improving cell disruption efficiency to facilitate protein release from microalgae using chemical and mechanical integrated method

      2018, Biochemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is mainly due to the high protein content [4,5], nutritional quality with excellent amino acids profile [1,5,6], and availability of microalgae [7]. As compared to the terrestrial crops, microalgae possesses high photosynthetic efficiency [8], high growth rate with shorter harvesting cycle [9,10], high disease resistance ability and high biomass density [3]. Moreover, there are fewer seasonal and weather restrictions in the microalgal cultivation when compared with the land-based crops [11,12].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text