Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using ‘interventional’ MRI
Introduction
There has already been extensive work on the kinematics of the tibio-femoral joint, but no previous study has imaged the internal anatomy of the living weight-bearing knee throughout the range of movement. Recent work using MRI in unloaded cadaveric and living knees has permitted descriptions of the femoral and tibial articular surfaces, and has imaged the movements of the medial and lateral femoral condyles during various arcs of knee flexion (Niitsu et al., 1990; Ando et al., 1994; Todo et al., 1999; Iwaki et al., 2000; Pinskerova et al., 2000; Hill et al., 2000; Nakagawa et al., 2000; Wretenberg et al., 2002). The validity of this method of employing MRI to study tibio-femoral movement has been confirmed by comparing it with RSA (Karrholm, 2000), RSA combined with CT and with a 3D digitiser (Martelli and Pinskerova, 2002; McPherson et al. (2002), McPherson et al. (2004)) carried out on the same 3 cadaveric knees.
A preliminary study to test the feasibility of using open MRI to image the weight-bearing living knee was published in Hill et al. (2000). Only 7 knees in male subjects were imaged in 4 positions from 0° to 90°. Non-weight bearing images were also obtained but not in the same subjects. Thus feasibility was demonstrated but the data was limited. The results obtained were comparable to the cadaveric experience (Iwaki et al., 2000). The object of the present study was to provide a definitive description over the whole flexion range based on Hill et al.'s preliminary work. We sought data points every 10° flexion from full extension to full flexion weight-bearing in 10 males. We also extended data on the effect of non-weight bearing vs. weight-bearing and of tibial rotation, and we compared males with females and left with right knees.
Section snippets
Volunteers and methods
Ten male volunteers with no known abnormalities of the knee were recruited. The subjects were Caucasians with a mean age of 25 years (20–30 years). MR images of the right knees were obtained using a 0.5 T superconducting open magnet scanner (Signa SPIO; General Electrical Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) as described by Vedi et al. (1999). The vertical open configuration of the scanner allows the subject to be positioned weight-bearing standing and squatting, whilst the knee is scanned.
The male weight bearing knee from full extension to full flexion in neutral tibial rotation
On flexion from hyperextension (‘−5°’) to 120°, the lateral femoral condyle (measured by the lateral flexion facet centre) translates backward 21.1 mm±4.7 mm (mean±standard deviation) relative to the tibia. From 120° to full deep flexion (140°), there is another 9.8 mm (±2.1 mm) posterior movement such that the lateral condyle almost subluxes posteriorly relative to the tibia (Fig. 2).
In contrast, the medial condyle (medial flexion facet centre) moves forwards 1.7 mm±1.3 mm between −5° and 30° (2.2
Discussion
The first part of this study differs from that of Hill et al. (2000) in that more subjects were involved; more points in the flexion arc were examined, a greater range of flexion was studied, and imaging protocols and tracking methods were improved. Indeed, so far as we aware, this study is the first in which the soft tissues and bones of the weight bearing living knee have been imaged over small increments throughout the range. It therefore represents baseline data for other studies of
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Prof. Michael Freeman for his support and guidance, and L. Anderton, S. Wickes, C. Dowling, I. Guerrish, R. Jillard (senior radiographers at the Interventional MRI Unit at St. Mary's Hospital), A. McPherson (computer scientist) and I. Grace (statistician) for their assistance. This study was sponsored by the Professional Football Association.
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from any commercial party in relation to the subject of this
References (30)
- et al.
The envelope of passive knee joint movement
Journal of Biomechanics
(1988) - et al.
Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design
Journal of Biomechanics
(1985) - et al.
Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking
Journal of Biomechanics
(1992) - et al.
Biomechanics of the kneemethodological considerations in the in vivo kinematic analysis of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint
Clinical Biomechanics
(1999) - et al.
Effect of skin movement on analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running
Journal of Biomechanics
(1997) - et al.
Tibiofemoral contact points relative to flexion angle measured with MRI
Clinical Biomechanics
(2002) - et al.
Analysis of knee movement with low-field MR equipment—a normal volunteer study
Radiation Medicine
(1994) - et al.
In vivo three-dimensional kinematics using a biplanar image matching technique
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
(2001) - et al.
Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement
The Lancet
(1986) - Braune, W., Fischer, O., 1891. Die bewegungen des Kniegelenks nach einer neuer Methode am lebenden Menschen gemessen....
Active visualisation—MR tracking
A correlative study of the geometry and anatomy of the distal femur
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Interventional magnetic resonance imaging
BJU International Suppl. 1
The ‘screw home’ movement in the knee joint
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
Kinematics of the knee joint in deep flexiona radiographic assessment
Medical Engineering & Physics
Cited by (295)
Kinematic Performance of Medial Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty
2024, Journal of ArthroplastyLower limb muscle activation pattern in male soccer players with lumbar hyperlordosis
2023, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies