ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Journal of Applied Logic
Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2005, Pages 161-184
A Paraconsistent Decagon, The Workshop on Paraconsistent Logic
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (243 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.jal.2004.07.016    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Anti-intuitionism and paraconsistency

Andreas B.M. Brunnera, Corresponding Author Contact Information, 1, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Walter A. Carniellib, 2, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aDepartment of Mathematics – UFBA, Salvador, BA, Brazil bCentre for Logic, Epistemology and the History of Science and IFCH – UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil

Available online 20 August 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This paper aims to help to elucidate some questions on the duality between the intuitionistic and the paraconsistent paradigms of thought, proposing some new classes of anti-intuitionistic propositional logics and investigating their relationships with the original intuitionistic logics. It is shown here that anti-intuitionistic logics are paraconsistent, and in particular we develop a first anti-intuitionistic hierarchy starting with Johansson's dual calculus and ending up with Gödel's three-valued dual calculus, showing that no calculus of this hierarchy allows the introduction of an internal implication symbol. Comparing these anti-intuitionistic logics with well-known paraconsistent calculi, we prove that they do not coincide with any of these. On the other hand, by dualizing the hierarchy of the paracomplete (or maximal weakly intuitionistic) many-valued logics (In)nset membership, variantω we show that the anti-intuitionistic hierarchy (In*)nset membership, variantω obtained from (In)nset membership, variantω does coincide with the hierarchy of the many-valued paraconsistent logics (Pn)nset membership, variantω. Fundamental properties of our method are investigated, and we also discuss some questions on the duality between the intuitionistic and the paraconsistent paradigms, including the problem of self-duality. We argue that questions of duality quite naturally require refutative systems (which we call elenctic systems) as well as the usual demonstrative systems (which we call deictic systems), and multiple-conclusion logics are used as an appropriate environment to deal with them.

Keywords: Dualizing logics; Anti-intuitionism; Paraconsistency; Dual-intuitionistic logics; Intuitionism; Paracompleteness

Mathematical subject codes: 03B50; 03B53; 03B55

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. An environment for dualization
3. Heyting's and Johansson's dual calculi
3.1. The dual of Heyting's calculus
3.2. The dual of Johansson's calculus
4. The hierarchy of Gödel's dual calculi
5. The duals of the paracomplete logics (In)nset membership, variantω
6. Additional properties and comparisons
6.1. The anti-constructive logics AC
6.2. The anti-paracomplete logics AP
7. Summary and conclusions
Acknowledgements
References

Journal of Applied Logic
Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2005, Pages 161-184
A Paraconsistent Decagon, The Workshop on Paraconsistent Logic
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.