ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Information Processing & Management
Volume 40, Issue 3, May 2004, Pages 441-458
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (398 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2003.12.005    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The role of manually-assigned keywords in query expansion

Kazem Taghva Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Julie Borsack , Thomas Nartker and Allen Condit

Information Science Research Institute, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4021, USA

Received 26 July 2002; 
accepted 17 December 2003. 
Available online 7 February 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

We report on two types of experiments with respect to manually-assigned keywords to documents in a collection. The first type of experiment examines the usefulness of manually-assigned keywords to automatic feedback. The second type of experiment considers the potential benefits of these keywords to the user as an interactive tool. Several experiments were run and compared. The results of these experiments indicate that there is no gain in average precision when manually-assigned keywords are used for query expansion. Further, manually-assigned keywords did not aid the user as an interactive tool for document understanding.

Author Keywords: Author Keywords: Query expansion; Document keywords; Relevance feedback; Retrieval effectiveness; User satisfaction

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Related research
2.1. Interactive evaluation measures
2.2. Automatic query expansion
2.3. Interactive relevance feedback
2.4. The human element
3. Research design
3.1. Experimental collection set
3.2. Retrieval environment
3.3. Experimental data capture
4. Experiments
4.1. Experiment description
4.2. Interpretation of recall/precision results
5. The user's perspective
5.1. Survey results
5.2. Final questionnaire analysis
6. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Appendix A. Final questionnaire
References






 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.