ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Information Processing Letters
Volume 101, Issue 3, 14 February 2007, Pages 126-128
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (93 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.ipl.2006.09.001    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

The Ford–Johnson algorithm still unbeaten for less than 47 elementsstar, open

Marcin Peczarskia, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aInstitute of Informatics, Warsaw University, ul. Banacha 2, 02-097 Warszawa, Poland

Received 11 May 2006; 
revised 19 May 2006; 
accepted 4 September 2006. 
Communicated by L.A. Hemaspaandra. 
Available online 5 October 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Using exhaustive computer search we show that sorting 15 elements requires 42 comparisons, and that for n<47 there is no algorithm of the following form: “m and nm elements are sorted using the Ford–Johnson algorithm first, then the sorted sequences are merged”, whose total number of used comparisons is smaller than the number of comparisons used by the Ford–Johnson algorithm to sort n elements directly.

Keywords: Analysis of algorithms; Sorting; Merging


Information Processing Letters
Volume 101, Issue 3, 14 February 2007, Pages 126-128
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.