Fig. 1. Synthesis of the writing model of Hayes (1996, p. 4).

Fig. 2. Timeline observation sessions.

Fig. 3. Observation setting.

Fig. 4. Taxonomy of repairs (Stifelman, 1993, p. 3).

Fig. 5. Example of transcription model.

Fig. 6. Notation system for writing processes with speech recognition.

Fig. 7. ‘Original’ text of the transcription.

Fig. 8. Number of switches per minute from speech in the first and second half (left), in the second and fifth writing session (right).

Fig. 9. Number of switches per minute from speech in the first and second half (left), in the second and fifth writing session (right).

Fig. 10. Distribution of the revisions over the writing phases (left), direction of the revisions (right).

Fig. 11. Transcription of fragment writing process Frederik (2).

Fig. 12. Final text of fragment Frederik.

Fig. 13. Transcription of fragment writing process Steven (4).

Fig. 14. Final text of fragment Steven.

Number of observation sessions in the quantitative study and case study

Mean use of writing modes in percentages (4 observation sessions)

Mean proportion of speech mode in both halves of the writing process in percentages (four observation sessions)

Mean part of speech mode in both parts of the writing process in percentages (four observation sessions)

Mean number of switches per minute from speech mode to the other writing modes during the writing process (four observation sessions)

Percentage of time attributed to the different subprocesses in writing texts

Summary details of the five observations

Mean use of writing modes in percentages (four observation sessions)

Mean part of speech mode in both halves of the writing process in percentages (four observation sessions)

Mean number of repairs, problems and revisions per minute and problems and revisions as a percentage of number of repairs

Mean number and length of pauses over four observations