REVIEWNavigation-aided reconstruction of medial orbital wall and floor contour in cranio-maxillofacial reconstruction
Introduction
A precise repositioning, or reconstruction, of the orbital walls, especially of the transition area between orbital floor and medial orbital wall, is a key procedure in orbital trauma management, and contributes to a high degree to the normal function and aesthetics of the midface.3., 14. In patients presenting with massive comminution, the reconstruction of the medial orbital floor is challenging. Computer-assisted planning has proved to be a very effective technique for re-establishing orbital symmetry.2., 4., 9., 11., 13., 18.
Section snippets
Material and methods
From January 1999 to July 2001, 20 patients with unilateral post-traumatic orbital deformities underwent computer-assisted surgical reconstruction of the orbit. Five patients presented with severe injuries to the orbit, including a massive destruction of the transitional area between the medial orbital wall and medial aspect of the orbital floor.
These five patients were operated on, using coronal and transconjunctival approaches. Intraoral incisions were performed additionally for those
Results
Intraoperative, pointer-based navigation was successfully carried out at the STN-workstation in five reconstructions of the medial aspect of the orbital floor/medial orbital wall for positioning of bone grafts. In the three zones of measurement, the post-operative CT scan demonstrated a maximum discrepancy of 2.7 mm between the simulated, intraoperatively identified and the achieved positions. The average discrepancy was 1.3 mm.
The mean orbital volumes for the unaffected orbits measured
Case report
A 20-year-old female patient suffered from a massive enophthalmus of the left orbit following a road accident. Reconstruction of a displaced zygomatic fracture and reconstruction of the outer orbital frame were performed 9 months later. The frontal view with the intruded and caudally displaced globe is shown in Fig. 5.
The virtual position of the bone grafts and amounts of intended corrections of the sagittal eye projection were drawn at the workstation (Figure 5, Figure 6).
Via a combined
Conclusions
The refinements in pre-operative planning for cranio-maxillofacial surgery procedures have lead to major improvements in clinical outcomes.1., 6., 7., 8., 12., 17. The surgeon becomes virtually familiar with the individual patient’s anatomy before the operation, and has the possibilities to adjust the grey scales of images and the projected reconstruction to the requirements needed.5., 16., 21., 22.
During surgery, navigation provides exact determination of transverse, cranio-caudal and
References (23)
- et al.
Single-step fronto-orbital resection and reconstruction with individual resection template and corresponding titanium implant: a new method of computer-aided surgery
J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.
(1998) - et al.
Correction of post-traumatic orbital deformities: operative techniques and review of 26 patients
J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.
(1995) - et al.
Intraoperative navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
(1995) - et al.
Custom-made cast titanium implants produced with CAD/CAM for the reconstruction of cranium defects
Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
(1998) - et al.
Benefits of sterelithography in orbital reconstruction
Ophthalmology
(1999) - et al.
Concepts in orbital reconstruction
Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am.
(1997) - et al.
Experience in the use of calvarial bone grafts in orbital reconstruction
Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
(1992) - et al.
Deep orbital reconstruction for correction of post-traumatic enophthalmos
Clin. Plast. Surg.
(1987) - et al.
The use of computer-generated three-dimensional models in orbital reconstruction
Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.
(1998) - et al.
Computer-aided navigation in secondary reconstruction of post-traumatic deformities of the zygoma
J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg.
(1997)
Controversies and current status of therapy of optic nerve damage in craniofacial traumatology and surgery
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir.
Cited by (157)
Accuracy of surgical navigation for patient-specific reconstructions of orbital fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
2024, Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAccuracy of intraoperative navigation for orbital fracture repair: A retrospective morphometric analysis
2023, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial SurgerySelf-centering second-generation patient-specific functionalized implants for deep orbital reconstruction
2021, Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryAdvanced Concepts of Orbital Reconstruction: A Unique Attempt to Scientifically Evaluate Individual Techniques in Reconstruction of Large Orbital Defects
2021, Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :The addition of 3D virtual planning is considered to be superior to conventional reconstruction with multi-planar reconstruction information from a CT scan. Additional anatomic landmarks of the preoperative 3D planning, enhanced insight in the extent of the fracture, and the detailed knowledge of the ideal implant position help the surgeon to achieve a better reconstruction result (in terms of implant position).1,23,24 The mean acquired implant position is visualized in Fig. 12.
A retrospective study to compare the treatment outcomes with and without surgical navigation for fracture of the orbital wall
2021, Chinese Journal of Traumatology - English EditionRobotics in Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Advanced Surgical Planning
2020, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America