ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Information and Software Technology
Volume 47, Issue 6, 15 April 2005, Pages 383-397
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (279 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2004.09.005    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Does UML make the grade? Insights from the software development community

Martin Grossmana, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Jay E. Aronsonb, 1, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Richard V. McCarthyc, 2, E-mail The Corresponding Author

aDepartment of Management, Bridgewater State College, Bridgewater, MA 02325, USA bDepartment of Management Information Systems, Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA cLender School of Business, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, CT 06518, USA

Received 25 January 2004. 
Available online 11 November 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

The Unified Modeling Language (UML) has become the de facto standard for systems development and has been promoted as a technology that will help solve some of the longstanding problems in the software industry. However, there is still little empirical evidence supporting the claim that UML is an effective approach to modeling software systems. Indeed, there is much anecdotal evidence suggesting the contrary, i.e. that UML is overly complex, inconsistent, incomplete and difficult to learn. This paper describes an investigation into the adoption and use of UML in the software development community. A web-based survey was conducted eliciting responses from users of UML worldwide. Results indicate a wide diversity of opinion regarding UML, reflecting the relative immaturity of the technology as well as the controversy over its effectiveness. This paper discusses the results of the survey and charts of the course for future research in UML usage.

Keywords: Unified Modeling Language; UML; Object-oriented analysis and design; OOAD; Task-technology fit

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Survey development
2.2. Survey administration
3. Results
3.1. Instrument validity and reliability
3.2. Respondent characteristics
3.3. Additional findings
3.3.1. Raw survey results
3.3.2. TTF response indices
3.3.3. Other characteristics of UML
4. Implications
4.1. Future research
5. Summary and conclusion
5.1. Summary
5.2. Conclusion
References




 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.