ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Information and Software Technology
Volume 46, Issue 5, 15 April 2004, Pages 329-335
Special Issue on Software Engineering, Applications, Practices and Tools from the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2003
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (159 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2003.09.006    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

On the testing methods used by beginning software testers*1

Yuen Tak Yu Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, a, S. P. Ng E-mail The Corresponding Author, b, Pak-Lok Poon c and T. Y. Chen E-mail The Corresponding Author, b

a Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China b School of Information Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Vic. 3122, Australia c School of Accounting and Finance, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

Available online 24 October 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This paper describes our experiences of the methods used by novice software testers to test their own programs, as well as their perception of the classification-tree method, which is a black box testing method first introduced by Grochtmann and Grimm. We conducted two case studies involving novice software testers. The subjects in the first study possessed one-year working experience while those in the second study had a wider range of working experiences. Both studies found that white box testing methods were initially far more popular than black box methods, but the majority of the subjects were convinced of the benefits of the classification-tree method after they had learned and used it. About two-third of them indicated their preference of the classification-tree method over the methods they originally used.

Author Keywords: Author Keywords: Black box testing; Classification-tree method; Software testing; Specification-based testing; White box testing

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. The case studies
2.1. Background
2.1.1. The first case study (full-time students)
2.1.2. The second case study (part-time students)
2.2. The setting
3. Observations and discussions
3.1. Testing methods used by students
3.1.1. The first case study (full-time students)
3.1.2. The second case study (part-time students)
3.1.3. Summary of all students combined
3.2. Students' perception of CTM
3.2.1. The first case study (full-time students)
3.2.2. The second case study (part-time students)
3.3. Comparing CTM with students' methods
3.3.1. The first case study (full-time students)
3.3.2. The second case study (part-time students)
3.3.3. Summary of all students combined
3.4. Effectiveness of students' programs and test suites
3.4.1. The first case study (full-time students)
3.4.2. The second case study (part-time students)
4. Conclusion and further work
Acknowledgements
References



Information and Software Technology
Volume 46, Issue 5, 15 April 2004, Pages 329-335
Special Issue on Software Engineering, Applications, Practices and Tools from the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2003
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.