ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Image and Vision Computing
Volume 25, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 250-261
Articulated and Non-rigid motion
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (381 K)

  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2006.01.008    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Nonrigid motion recovery for 3D surfaces

Min Lia, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Chandra Kambhamettua and Maureen Stoneb

aDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA bVocal Tract Visualization Lab, University of Maryland Dental School, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

Received 15 October 2004; 
revised 4 January 2006; 
accepted 5 January 2006. 
Available online 25 April 2006.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

We present a spline-based nonrigid motion and point correspondence recovery method for 3D surfaces. This method is based on differential geometry. Shape information is used to recover the point correspondences. In contrast to the majority of shape-based methods, which assume that shape (unit normal, curvature) changes are minimum after motion, our method focuses on the nonrigid relationship between before-motion and after-motion shapes. This nonrigid shape relationship is described by modeling the underlying nonrigid motion; we model it as a spline transformation, which has global control over the entire motion field along with the local deformation integrated within. This provides our method certain advantages over some pure differential geometric methods, which also utilize the nonrigid shape relationship but only work on local areas without a global control. For example, motion regularity is hard to implement in these pure differential geometric methods but is not a problem when the motion field is controlled by a spline transformation. The orthogonal parameterization requirement of the nonrigid shape relationship has to be approximated in these previous methods but is easy to meet in our method. Furthermore, the small deformation constraint introduced by the previous works is relaxed in our method.

Experiments on both synthetic and real motions have been conducted. The quantitative and qualitative evaluations of our method are presented. The application of our method to the human tongue motion analysis is also presented in this paper.

Keywords: Nonrigid motion; Correspondence; Spline; Shape-based methods

Article Outline

1. Introduction
1.1. The direct shape-based method
1.2. The nonrigid shape-based method
1.3. Our approach
2. Background
3. Nonrigid motion modeling: GRBF
4. Motion recovery
4.1. Approximation of A(r, P)
4.2. Approximation of n′(r+s(r, P))
4.3. Unit normal equation
4.4. Additional constraints
4.5. Recovery solution
5. Experiments
5.1. Synthetic motion
5.2. Real motion
5.2.1. Real motion mapping
5.2.2. Evaluation with real motion
5.3. Cyberware data
5.4. Human tongue motion analysis
6. Conclusion
Acknowledgements
References













Image and Vision Computing
Volume 25, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 250-261
Articulated and Non-rigid motion
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.