Original Research
Experimental study on blocking and self-cleaning behaviors of beam dam in debris flow hazard mitigation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2018.04.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Blocking is one of the important features when a beam dam intercepts debris flow, while self-cleaning is another when managing suspended debris flow. Both features determine the debris flow control benefits of beam dam but the latter often is not considered in practical engineering design. In this paper, a series of specially designed flume experiments were done to simulate blocking and self-cleaning processes. The blocking ratio and deposition features were measured to contrast the blocking and self-cleaning performance before and after artificial self-cleaning. The experimental results reveal that the beam dam net opening, particle diameter of sediment, sediment concentration, and gradient of the channel are the main factors affecting blocking performance. A new criterion of blocking performance of beam dams that considers the interaction of multiple factors and can provide guidance to practical project design is proposed. For all three types of blocking, sediment deposited upstream of a beam dam can be effectively transported downstream by erosion from post-debris-flow floods, Self-cleaning performance is most efficient for temporary blocking, followed by partial-blocking, and total-blocking. The efficiency of self-cleaning largely depends on the change of the sediment deposit due to erosion. Finally, a discussion is given for the optimal design of an open-type check dam and the feasibility of synergistic effects of self-cleaning in combination with artificial cleaning. Some supporting artificial silt-cleaning should be implemented in practice. A beam dam will, thus, have more storage capacity with which to control the next debris flow event.

Introduction

Debris flows are geomorphic processes or violent natural disasters of multiphase movement due to gravity in mountainous areas (Fei and Shu, 2004, Iverson, 1997). Check dams, which are one of the most effective counter measures for debris flow hazard mitigation, can be distinguished as closed-type and open-type. The former is commonly used to stabilize the gully bed and bank slopes, whereas the latter is mainly used to trap and regulate sediment of debris flows (Fei and Shu, 2004, Li, 1997). Some open-type check dams, such as beam dams (Chen et al., 2006, Cui, 2005, Cui et al., 2007), slot-check dam (Chen et al., 2014, Zou et al., 2014, Zou and Chen, 2015) have performed well in Wenchuan earthquake area and scenic spots. There have also been successful precedents in debris flows mitigation along railways ( Fei & Shu, 2004; Li, 1997; Shen & Wang, 1996). At present some linear projects still pass through areas where mountainous hazards frequently occur: e.g., there are thousands debris flow gullies along the Sichuan-Tibet Highway (Zhao, 1993). Further, the Sichuan-Tibet railway project which is under construction, also facing with increasingly serious issues of mountainous hazards. Thus, open-type check dams will frequently be applied in these areas. To meet design requirements, some qualitative and quantitative experimental and numerical research (Itoh et al., 2013, Lin et al., 2011, Michele and Arrmanini, 2000, Mizuno et al., 2001, Takahashi et al., 2010, Watanbe et al., 1980, Zou and Chen, 2015) have been done for various open-type check dams. Additionally, D'Agostino et al. (2000), Wu and Chang (2002), Nakatani et al., 2007, Nakatani et al., 2008, Maricar and Hashimoto (2014), and Schwindt et al. (2015) did a series of researches which focused on other aspects of a check dam, such as the trapping of driftwood with an open-type check dam.

A blockade forms when trapping debris flow with an open-type check dam. The blockade forms in opening of the check dam due to the deposition large gravel particles in the debris flow, and the subsequently transported sediment deposits upstream. Self-cleaning is a phenomenon in which sediment deposited upstream of a check dam is eroded by perennial flow or post-debris-flow floods whereby storage capacity is recovered automatically. A considerable number of studies have been done to investigate blocking behavior at open-type check dams using experimental, numerical and mathematical methods (Han, 2007, Maricar, 2012, Michele et al., 2005, Mizuyama et al., 1995, Satofuka and Mizuyama, 2006, Shibuya et al., 2012, Takahashi et al., 2001, You, 2001, Zhao, 2013), however, few studies have paid attention to self-cleaning (Piton and Recking, 2015, Shrestha et al., 2008, Wu and Chang, 2002).

To demonstrate the blocking and self-cleaning behaviors of beam dams, an experimental study was done at the Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process (KLMHESP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). According to the available research methods, the characteristics of blocking and self-cleaning of beam dams were analyzed, including the critical blocking criterion and the self-cleaning performance for different blocking-types under erosion from post-debris-flow floods (PDFF). These experimental results may provide a technological basis for an optimal design of a beam dam so that it will provide a better service for disaster prevention and mitigation.

Section snippets

Test setup

A series of flume experiments were done in KLMHESP, CAS, to investigate blocking and self-cleaning behaviors of beam dams. The experimental setup consists of a hopper (60 cm × 60 cm × 80 cm), a rectangular channel (400 cm × 30 cm × 40 cm, with an adjustable gradient of 0–36%), a beam dam model, and a tail water pool. A beam dam made of wood and steel was placed 1 m from the end of the rectangular channel. Fig. 1 is a schematic sketch of the experimental facility. Both sides of the flume were

Blocking and self-cleaning process

Fig. 3, Fig. 4 show the blocking and self-cleaning process in the flume experiments at different times. As the sluice of the hopper was opened, the debris surged into the flume rapidly. When debris flow passed through beam dam, it was blocked gradually by large boulders in the debris flow from the bottom up. Subsequently transported sediment deposited upstream of the beam dam. The velocity and discharge of the debris flow were reduced dramatically. After the debris flow passed the blockade was

Discussion and suggestions about the optimal design of a beam dam

Owing to its simple structure, material savings and little effect on the environment (Cui et al., 2005, Cui et al., 2007, Shen and Wang, 1996), beam dams have good potential in term of debris flow hazard mitigation in Wenchuan Earthquake area; for protection of railways, highways and pipelines; and in scenic areas. The opening of a beam dam is blocked by one or more large boulders in a debris flow, and the subsequently transported sediment deposit upstream of the beam dam. Both practical

Conclusions

In this study, an experimental investigation was done to clarify the behavior and characteristics of blocking and self-cleaning of beam dams under different conditions. The following preliminary conclusions are draw from the results and analysis of the investigation.

  • (1)

    A new critical criterion (F) of the blocking performance of beam dam that considers the interaction of multiple factors is proposed. The beam dam performs as total-blocking when F2.0, partial-blocking when 2.0<F<7.0, and

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 41772343), West Light Foundation (Class A) of the CAS, and the 135 Strategic Program of the Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS (No. SDS-135-1701). The authors thank three anonymous reviewers and the editors for their comments.

References (45)

  • T. Itoh et al.

    Hydraulic model tests for evaluating sediment control function with a grid-type Sabo dam in mountainous torrents

    International Journal of Sediment Research

    (2013)
  • K. Ashida et al.

    Study on debris flow control – hydraulic function of grid type open dam

    Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University

    (1980)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Civil engineering techniques for debris flow control in national parks

    The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control

    (2006)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Engineering measures for debris flow hazard mitigation in the Wenchuan earthquake area

    Engineering Geology

    (2014)
  • P. Cui

    Debris flow study and prevention in national park

    (2005)
  • P. Cui et al.

    Techniques of debris flow prevention in national parks

    Earth Science Frontiers

    (2007)
  • P. Cui et al.

    Research and prevention of debris flow in national parks

    (2005)
  • V. D'Agostino et al.

    Experimental investigation on open check dams for coarse woody debris control

    Quaderni di Idronomia Montana

    (2000)
  • X. Fei et al.

    Debris flow kinematic mechanism and disaster prevention

    (2004)
  • Fukawa, G., Katsuki, S., Ishikawa N., & Yamada, T. (2002). Simulation and stochastic evaluation of open type steel...
  • W. Han

    Fundamental study on intercepting sediment capability of silt dam in preventing debris flow (Ph.D. dissertation)

    (2007)
  • Ishikawa, N., Fukawa, G., Katsuki S., & Yamada, T. (2004). Catch effect of debris flow for open type steel check dam by...
  • Ishikawa, N., Shima, J., Matsubara, T., Tatesawa, H., Horiguchi, T., & Mizuyama, T. (2014) Trapping mechanism of debris...
  • R.M. Iverson

    The physics of debris flows

    Rev Geophysics

    (1997)
  • R. Katade et al.

    Study on effect of variance of rock diameter on capturing probability for Grid check dam

    Kozo Kogaku Ronbunshu A

    (2011)
  • D. Li

    Theory and practice of debris flow disaster mitigation

    (1997)
  • H.P. Lien

    Design of slit dams for controlling stony debris flows

    International Journal of Sediment Research

    (2003)
  • P.S. Lin et al.

    Retaining function of open-type sabo dams

  • F. Maricar

    Debris flow control by open type check dam (Ph.D. dissertation)

    (2012)
  • Maricar, F., & Hashimoto. H. (2014). A comparison of wood-sediment-water mixture flows at a closed type and an open...
  • C. Michele et al.

    Case study: Efficiency of slit-check dams in the mountain region of versilia basin

    Journal of Hydraulic Engineering

    (2005)
  • Michele, L., & Arrmanini, A. (2000). Design criteria of slit check dams and downstream channels for debris flow. In...
  • Cited by (6)

    • Experimental investigation of the effects of shrub filter strips on debris flow trapping and interception

      2023, International Journal of Sediment Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Further, the transport capacity is influenced by the properties of the fluid (components of the particles, viscosity or level of dilution), the underlying surface condition (roughness, slope, distance, and topography; He et al., 2018; Li et al., 2015), and the characteristics of intercepting structures (ecological and geotechnical engineering; Lan et al., 2020; Michelini et al., 2016). Considerable research on sediment transport capacity refers to the fluid characteristics of debris flow (Liu et al., 2020; Yin et al., 2021) and surface condition (Gregoretti & Fontana, 2008) as well as civil engineering features (Sun et al., 2018, 2021). Especially, such geotechnical engineering projects are limited by their design requirements and high costs, which makes them difficult to apply over large areas.

    View full text