International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences
Limit analysis solutions for the bearing capacity of rock masses using the generalised Hoek–Brown criterion
Introduction
The ultimate bearing capacity is an important design consideration for dams, roads, bridges and other engineering structures, particularly when large rock masses are the foundation materials. With the exception of some very soft rocks and heavily jointed media, the majority of rock masses provide an excellent foundation material. However, there is a need to accurately estimate the ultimate bearing capacity for structures with high foundation loads such as tall buildings and dams.
Rigorous theoretical solutions to the problem of foundations resting on rock masses do not appear to exist in the literature. This may be attributed to the fact that rock masses are inhomogeneous, discontinuous media composed of rock material and naturally occurring discontinuities such as joints, fractures and bedding planes. This makes the derivation of simple theoretical solutions based on limit equilibrium methods very difficult. In addition, fractures and discontinuities occurring naturally in rock masses are difficult to model using the displacement finite element method without the addition of special interface or joint elements. The upper and lower bound formulations of Lyamin and Sloan [1], [2] are ideally suited to analysing jointed or fissured materials due to the existence of discontinuities throughout the mesh. These discontinuities allow an abrupt change in stresses in the lower bound formulation and in velocities in the upper bound formulation. Moreover, employing discontinuities when modelling geotechnical problems enables great flexibility as they can be assigned different material properties and/or yield criteria. This unique feature was recently exploited by Sutcliffe et al. [3] and Zheng et al. [4] who used the formulations of Sloan [5] and Sloan and Kleeman [6] to analyse the bearing capacity of jointed rock and fissured materials respectively.
The purpose of this paper is to take advantage of the ability of the limit theorems to bracket the actual collapse load by computing both lower and upper bounds for the bearing capacity of strip footings on a broken rock mass. These solutions are obtained using the numerical techniques developed by Lyamin and Sloan [1], [2] which have been modified to incorporate the well-known Hoek–Brown yield criterion [7]. The applicability and background of the Hoek–Brown criterion will be discussed in the following section in more detail.
Section snippets
Applicability
It is well known that the strength of jointed rock masses is notoriously difficult to assess. The behaviour of a rock mass is complicated greatly because deformations and sliding along naturally occurring discontinuities can occur in addition to deformations and failure in the intact parts (blocks) of the rock mass. Unfortunately, laboratory tests on specific core samples is often not representative of a rock mass at field scale, while in situ strength testing of the rock mass is seldom
Problem definition
The plane strain bearing capacity problem to be considered is illustrated in Fig. 3. A strip footing of width rests upon a jointed rock mass with an intact uniaxial compressive strength , geological strength index GSI, rock mass unit weight , and intact rock yield parameter . The ultimate capacity can be written aswhere is defined as the bearing capacity factor. For a weightless rock mass , the above expression is valid but the bearing capacity factor is replaced
Previous studies
A review of the literature reveals that very few thorough numerical analyses have been performed to determine the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on rock. Of the numerical studies that have been presented, few can be considered as rigorous. The ultimate tip bearing capacity of pile foundations, on the other hand, has received much more attention and is discussed by Serrano and Olalla [11], [18].
Carter and Kulhawy [19] and Kulhawy and Carter [20] proposed a simple lower bound
Results and discussion
The computed upper and lower bound estimates of the bearing capacity factor for both the weightless and ponderable rock analyses were found to be within 5% of each other. This indicates that, for practical design purposes, the true collapse load has been bracketed to within or better. As a consequence, average values of the upper and lower bound bearing capacity factor have been calculated and will be used in the following discussions.
Typical upper and lower bound meshes for the
Comparison with previous numerical studies
As a preliminary comparison, several limit analyses were performed for weightless rock masses using equivalent Mohr–Coulomb parameters as determined by Eqs. (16) and (15). Table 2 presents the results obtained for three different quality rock masses. The equivalent Mohr–Coulomb parameters were obtained over two separate ranges of the minor principal stress ; namely, and . This table, along with Fig. 16, indicates just how sensitive the interpreted values of and
Conclusions
The bearing capacity of a surface strip footing resting on a rock mass whose strength can be described by the generalised Hoek–Brown failure criterion has been investigated. Using powerful new formulations of the upper and lower bound limit theorems, rigorous bounds on the bearing capacity for a wide range of material properties have been obtained. The results have been presented in terms of a bearing capacity factor in graphical form to facilitate their use in solving practical design
References (29)
- et al.
Lower bound solutions for bearing capacity of jointed rock
Comput Geotech
(2004) - et al.
Limit analysis of the bearing capacity of fissured materials
Int J Solids Struct
(2000) - et al.
Upper bound limit analysis using discontinuous velocity fields
Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng
(1995) - et al.
Ultimate bearing capacity of an anisotropic discontinuous rock mass, part I: basic modes of failure
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(1998) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(2002)- et al.
A smooth hyperbolic approximation to the Mohr–Coulomb yield criterion
Comput Struct
(1995) - et al.
Practical estimates of rock mass strength
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(1997) - et al.
Ultimate bearing capacity of an anisotropic discontinuous rock mass, part II: determination procedure
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
(1998) - et al.
Settlement and bearing capacity of foundations on rock masses and socketed foundations in rock masses
- et al.
Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr
(1994)
Allowable bearing capacity in rock foundations, using a non-linear failure criterium
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses based on the modified Hoek–Brown criterion
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
Ultimate bearing capacity at the tip of a pile in rock; theory (part I)
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
Ultimate bearing capacity at the tip of a pile in rock—part 2: application
Int J Rock Mech Min Sci
Cited by (213)
Ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings above rectangular voids in Hoek-Brown rock masses
2023, Computers and GeotechnicsTwo-dimensional face stability analysis in rock masses governed by the Hoek-Brown strength criterion with a new multi-horn mechanism
2023, International Journal of Mining Science and TechnologySeismic bearing capacity of rock foundations subjected to seepage by a unilateral piece-wise log-spiral failure mechanism
2023, Computers and GeotechnicsComputational Upper- and Lower-Bound 3D Limit Analysis Using the Hoek-Brown Yield Criterion
2024, International Journal of GeomechanicsStability Evaluation of Unlined Circular Tunnels in Sloping Rock Terrain Using Adaptive Finite Element Limit Analysis
2024, Indian Geotechnical JournalThe influence of the void shape in the bearing capacity of rock mass with a superficial void
2024, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science