Radiological prevalence of superior and posterior semicircular canal dehiscence in children

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.01.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Establishing the prevalence of semicircular canal dehiscence in a pediatric population using temporal bone CT imaging.

Study design

Retrospective analysis of all temporal bone CT scans during a 5-year period (2007–2012).

Methods

CT scan images were reformatted in the plane of the canals and assessed by two independent reviewers with a third to resolve disagreement. Detailed chart review was performed for those found to have dehiscence. Superior and posterior canals were classified as “dehiscent”, “possibly dehiscent”, “thin” or “normal” for each case.

Results

649 temporal bones were assessed from 334 children (under 18 years of age). The prevalence rate of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) was 1.7% (3.3% of individuals). Posterior canal dehiscence (PCD) was present in 1.2% (2.1% of individuals). There were no cases of bilateral SCD, and one case of bilateral PCD. Age under 3 years was associated with a higher prevalence of thinning but not dehiscence. Congenital inner ear malformation was not related to a higher probability of dehiscence. The superior petrosal sinus was associated with the SCD in three cases (27.3%). Retrospective chart review highlighted possible vestibular symptoms in 3/11 patients with SCD (27.3%).

Conclusions

This forms the largest pediatric study of canal dehiscence to date. This study's prevalence rate is significantly lower than previous reports. The identified association with overlying venous structures may reflect the etiological process involved. The occurrence in children supports the hypothesis of a congenital predisposition for development of canal dehiscence syndrome.

Introduction

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) was first described by Minor in 1998 and results from an absence of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in the petrous roof [1]. SCDS classically presents with “third window phenomenon” symptoms including aural fullness, conductive hyperacusis (i.e. pulsatile tinnitus, autophony) and pressure or sound induced vertigo [1].

Diagnosis of SCDS is based on clinical history and examination in combination with radiological evidence of dehiscent bone plus characteristic audiological and vestibular function test findings, most notably reduced threshold and high amplitude vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). High resolution computed tomography (CT) is an integral diagnostic feature of SCDS. It is well recognized that not all patients with evidence of SCD will develop SCDS; the discrepancy may be due to errors in imaging accuracy or that additional critical events are required to make the bony dehiscence symptomatic. Direct clinical visualization of the petrous roof is not feasible, and therefore CT remains the most accepted method of assessing bone integrity in this area.

The prevalence of bony dehiscence in children is important to our understanding of the etiology of this condition. Some authors advocate a congenital predisposition, which may subsequently lead to symptomatic clinical disease in adulthood, whilst others propose that intact bone in childhood is later thinned by osteopenic processes [2], [3] or microtrauma [4].

Previous prevalence studies have employed a variety of radiological methods, resulting in a wide range of published prevalence rates [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. We aimed to obtain a better estimate of the true prevalence by utilizing higher resolution imaging techniques in a larger sample size than has previously been studied with strict definition criteria. In addition we assessed correlation with congenital malformation, younger age and relationship with adjacent venous sinuses.

Section snippets

Study design

Retrospective case series. Analysis was made of all CT scans of the temporal bone undertaken at British Columbia Children's Hospital (Vancouver, Canada), followed by a retrospective chart review of any patient found to have canal dehiscence. Approval was obtained from the University of British Columbia Children's and Women's Research Ethics Board (Research protocol: H12-00582).

Inclusion criteria:

  • Temporal bone CT scans for any indication.

  • Scans performed between Jan 2007 and Jan 2012.

  • Age of

Results

Over the 5-year period reviewed, 408 CT scans were retrieved, equating to 816 temporal bones. 167 temporal bones were excluded: 31 for congenital or acquired disruption/malformation of the vestibular organ, 136 due to inadequate images (see Section 2 for explanation of exclusion criteria). This left 649 temporal bones from 334 individuals for analysis (see Fig. 2). The mean age of the cohort was 7.6 years (range 7 months–17.4 years). 66 children were under the age of three years (19.8%). There

Discussion

Previous studies have examined canal dehiscence radiologically [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [19] but report a large range in overall prevalence (see Table 4). Reasons for this discrepancy include the lack of an agreed definition of true dehiscence, the use of differing CT scanning technologies with variable slice thickness and lower spatial resolution, failure to reformat in the plane of the canals and only having one reviewer.

A limitation of any study based

Conclusion

We found evidence of superior and posterior canal dehiscence, and thinning of the bone without frank dehiscence, within a large series of children undergoing CT scanning of the petrous temporal bone. While the canal dehiscence syndrome remains rare in children, the presence of bony defects in this population supports a congenital predisposition leading to clinical manifestation of the syndrome at a later age.

Financial disclosures

None.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Ms. Rachelle Dar Santos Moshfeghi, Research Assistant, and Yogesh Thakur, Medical Physicist, for assistance with reformatting CT protocols.

References (26)

  • M. Crovetto et al.

    Anatomo-radiological study of the superior semicircular canal dehiscence radiological considerations of superior and posterior semicircular canals

    Eur. J. Radiol.

    (2010)
  • E.Y. Chen et al.

    Semicircular canal dehiscence in the pediatric population

    Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2009)
  • R.A. Williamson et al.

    Coronal computed tomography prevalence of superior semicircular canal dehiscence

    Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.

    (2003)
  • L.B. Minor et al.

    Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal

    Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.

    (1998)
  • C. Brandolini et al.

    Dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal: a review of the literature on its possible pathogenic explanations

    Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2013)
  • R.N. Nadgir et al.

    Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: congenital or acquired condition?

    Am. J. Neuroradiol.

    (2011)
  • C.J. Belden et al.

    CT evaluation of bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal as a cause of sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo

    Radiology

    (2003)
  • N. Ceylan et al.

    CT imaging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence: added value of reformatted images

    Acta Otolaryngol.

    (2010)
  • J.F. Cloutier et al.

    Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: positive predictive value of high-resolution CT scanning

    Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2008)
  • M. Hagiwara et al.

    Prevalence of radiographic semicircular canal dehiscence in very young children: an evaluation using high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bones

    Pediatr. Radiol.

    (2012)
  • S.C. Loke et al.

    Incidence of semicircular canal dehiscence in Singapore

    Brit. J. Radiol.

    (2009)
  • Y. Masaki

    The prevalence of superior canal dehiscence syndrome as assessed by temporal bone computed tomography imaging

    Acta Otolaryngol.

    (2011)
  • H. Stimmer et al.

    Semicircular canal dehiscence in HR multislice computed tomography: distribution, frequency, and clinical relevance

    Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Relationship Between Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Volume with Clinical Symptoms: Case Series

      2021, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although the etiology of SSCD is unknown, either a congenital or an acquired cause is possible.4 For example, multiple studies have supported the argument of a congenital etiology through reports of a dehiscence present in infant patients.4-8 However, the thickness of the bone overlying the superior semicircular canal has been shown to decrease with age, supporting the idea of an acquired etiology as well.9-11

    • Children with posterior semicircular canal dehiscence: A case series

      2019, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However the literature shows a wide range prevalence rates of SCD. The largest pediatric study concerning SCD, evaluating the temporal bones of 334 children, showed a prevalence rate of 5.4% (superior, 3.3%; posterior, 2.1%) [6]. Another study, involving high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the temporal bones of 34 children less than 2 years old, detected SCD in up to 27.3% (superior, 13.8%; posterior, 20%) [7].

    • Third Window Lesions

      2019, Neuroimaging Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Posterior semicircular canal dehiscence is a rare imaging finding, which can be observed in isolation or in combination with superior canal dehiscence. On CT, axial views perpendicular and Stenvers views parallel to the plane of the posterior semicircular canal help to increase the specificity of diagnosis.57–67 The posterior semicircular canal can dehisce into the posterior fossa dura via a bony defect, or through communication with a high-riding jugular bulb (Fig. 6).68–74

    • Superior semicircular canal dehiscence: a narrative review

      2022, Journal of Laryngology and Otology
    • The Pediatric Patient

      2023, Third Mobile Window Syndrome of the Inner Ear: Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and Associated Disorders
    • Future Research

      2023, Third Mobile Window Syndrome of the Inner Ear: Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and Associated Disorders
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presentation: The results of this study were presented at the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery (CSO-HNS) Annual Meeting on June 2nd 2013 in Banff, Alberta, Canada and the 28th Barany Society Meeting on May 28th 2014 in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

    View full text