Gender-specific barriers and facilitators to heart failure self-care: A mixed methods study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.12.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Although approximately half of adults with heart failure (HF) are women, relatively little is known about gender differences and similarities in HF self-care.

Aims

The aim of this study was to describe HF self-care in men and women and to identify gender-specific barriers and facilitators influencing HF self-care.

Methods

A total of 27 adults (8 women) with chronic HF participated in a cross-sectional, comparative mixed methods study. An analysis of in-depth interviews was used to describe gender-specific barriers and facilitators of self-care. After the interview data were analyzed, the results were confirmed in quantitative data obtained from the same sample and at the same time. Concordance between qualitative and quantitative data was assessed.

Results

There were no consistent gender-specific differences in self-care practices but there were distinct gender differences in the decisions made in interpreting and responding to symptoms. The men were better than the women at interpreting their symptoms as being related to HF and in initiating treatment. These differences were associated with differences in self-care confidence, social support, and mood.

Conclusion

Gender-specific differences in self-care behaviors are minimal. However, gender-specific barriers and facilitators greatly influence the choice of self-care behaviors.

Section snippets

Methods

We explored HF self-care in a cross-sectional, comparative mixed methods study conducted in 2008 in Melbourne, Australia. In-depth interviews were used to elicit self-care behaviors and to explore the barriers and facilitators of self-care. The qualitative analysis was considered primary in this study (QUAL quan). After the interview data were analyzed, the results were verified in the quantitative data obtained from the same sample and at the same time.

Results

Although a purposive sampling strategy was used to obtain an equal number of men and women, only 8 women and 19 men completed the study. We enrolled 40 persons and 27 completed the qualitative interview and all the quantitative surveys. Two additional participants completed all the surveys but not the interview, so they were not included here. Eleven who agreed to participate failed to do so because of ill health (n = 6), an inability to contact them after they signed the consent (n = 2), or

Discussion

The finding that men and women are comparable in the extent to which they adhere to treatment is not new; several others have found a similar result (Heo et al., 2008, Holst et al., 2007, Lee et al., 2009). What is new is identification of gender-specific barriers and facilitators that greatly influenced self-care. In this sample, women were more uncertain about their symptoms and tentative about taking action without guidance from a provider while the men felt more confident in their self-care

Conclusion

The results of this study support our prior conclusion that gender-specific differences in specific self-care behaviors are minimal. It does not appear that gender differences in self-care are responsible for the gender differences in outcomes known to exist. However, there are distinct gender differences in the decisions made in interpreting and responding to symptoms. These decisions are influenced by factors that are unique to men and women, including self-care confidence, the importance of

References (45)

  • L. Ayres et al.

    Within-case and across-case approaches to qualitative data analysis

    Qual. Health Res.

    (2003)
  • A. Bandura

    Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency

    Am. Psychol.

    (1982)
  • L.S. Baas et al.

    An exploratory study of developmental growth in adults with heart failure

    J. Holistic Nurs.

    (1999)
  • E.A. Bayliss et al.

    Descriptions of barriers to self-care by persons with comorbid chronic diseases

    Ann. Fam. Med.

    (2003)
  • N. Clark et al.

    Exploring self-efficacy as a predictor of disease management

    Health Educ. Behav.

    (1999)
  • J. Cresswell et al.

    Analyzing Data in Mixed Methods Research Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research

    (2007)
  • L.P. Derogatis

    BSI. Brief Symptom Inventory. Administration, Scoring, and Procedure Manual

    (1993)
  • V.V. Dickson et al.

    A typology of heart failure self-care management in non-elders

    Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs.

    (2008)
  • M.R. DiMatteo

    Variations in patients’ adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research

    Med. Care

    (2004)
  • V.M. Francis et al.

    British community norms for the brief symptom inventory

    Br. J. Clin. Psychol.

    (1990)
  • L. Francque-Frontiero et al.

    Self-care of persons with heart failure: does experience make a difference?

    Clin. Excellence Nurse Practitioners

    (2002)
  • B. Gonzalez et al.

    Nurse evaluation of patients in a new multidisciplinary Heart Failure Unit in Spain

    Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (67)

    • Gender differences in self-care maintenance and its associations among patients with chronic heart failure

      2019, International Journal of Nursing Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Better self-care maintenance was attributed to more knowledge of heart failure in men, whereas it was attributed to better self-care confidence and poorer functional status in women [16]. Nevertheless, a study reported that gender-specific factors (e.g., social support) affected self-care maintenance rather than gender itself [23]. Therefore, gender differences in self-care maintenance among CHF patients require further examination.

    • Self-care behavior and associated factors among adults with heart failure at cardiac follow-up clinics in West Amhara Region Referral Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017

      2019, International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Heart failure (HF) is a chronic, a serious progressive disease affecting >23 million cases worldwide (Bui et al., 2011) and 5.7 million cases were in the united population (Mozaffarian et al., 2015). Annually, the global economic cost of HF was estimated at $108 billion and also it is a major public health concern for both developed and developing countries (Cook et al., 2014; Riegel et al., 2010). Heart failure is a common illness requiring multiple medications and significant self-care behavior (Seto et al., 2011).

    • Outpatient Monitoring and Self-Care

      2018, Heart Failure in the Child and Young Adult: From Bench to Bedside
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text