Hospitality studies and hospitality management: A symbiotic relationship
Introduction
The primary aim of this paper is to review the evolution of hospitality as an academic subject. It commenced life with a focus on hospitality management, defined by Brotherton and Wood (2000, p. 168) as: ‘the management of hospitality in that one set of intellectual constructs and practices (management) are applied to another (hospitality)’. However, interestingly they stopped short of a reciprocal application. This represented a higher educational experience largely bounded within a narrow literature pertaining to business and management. Over time emerged a more inclusive hospitality studies approach which reflects on the connection of hospitality to society as a whole, and the location of the world of business and management therein (Lashley et al., 2007). This stance embraces literature and theory of multiple genre and discipline, including the social sciences. Further, it supports reciprocal application between the intellectual constructs and practices of both hospitality, and business and management. Hospitality subject development has now reached a point where there exists growing acceptance of the potential for, and value of, a symbiotic relationship between management and studies. As Morrison and O’Mahony (2003, p. 39) highlight, through such partnering there is: ‘potential to generate new ways of thinking and a wider appreciation of world views on the concept of hospitality as broadly conceived’. Consequently, it has become evident that hospitality as an academic subject has advanced in its evolution: ‘from being a topic simply for thematic investigation directly or indirectly for the study to management to one that also locates the study of hospitality as a significant means of exploring and understanding society’ (Lashley et al., 2007, p. 186). Thus, the paper addresses some of the significant aspects that have shaped this subject development including: discourse relative to the higher education context; vocational and/or liberal educational approaches; engagement with the social sciences; and the emergence and relationship between management and studies schools of thought. The paper argues that significant knowledge and intellectual advances can potentially be gained through a healthy inter-relationship between management and studies, drawing on a multi-disciplinary social science resource base. This aspect is demonstrated through the inclusion of a tangible illustration employing a historical means of enquiry to the context of religious hospitality. It provokes reflection, and evidence of the academic rigour and value of this approach. Ancient and classical texts, along with other relevant documentation, concerned with St. Benedict's Rule (c. 530 A.D.) have been critically analysed and interpreted. The research methodology applied is described and justified, and resultant findings, which form a taxonomy of principles of hospitality, are presented. This leads to consideration of the extent of change and continuity between this historical conception of hospitality and contemporary manifestations. Conclusions are drawn identifying and summarising issues pertaining to the subject development of hospitality in higher education. Thus, the key contribution of this paper is to critically analyse advances made since the introduction of hospitality as a higher education subject, capture contemporary thinking, and to support the recognition of the intellectual benefits for hospitality management theory and practices of a curriculum informed from a social science based studies perspective.
Section snippets
Higher education context and hospitality
The period of intellectual and cultural development that took place in the late mediaeval period led to the foundation of universities, initially offering higher education in the vocations. Thus, Tribe (2003) notes that down the centuries, universities have primarily survived as academies for training for the ‘professions’, such as law, medicine, and theology. Over time, these have adapted to the changing economic and social structures and volume of demand for skills, to include the likes of
Hospitality across disciplinary boundaries
The foregoing provides a useful contextualisation of hospitality in higher education from which evolutionary movement can be observed. Moreover, this is not unique to hospitality. It is also mirrored within its sister subject of tourism (Bibbings, 2005). A further example is in sociology, where Beardsworth and Keil (1997, p. 6) urge academics to be more flexible regarding the traditional boundaries of their discipline in order to encourage: ‘interaction across boundaries thus opening novel
St. Benedict's Rule: an illustration
The research reported in this section addresses Lynch's (2005) appeal for the adoption of subjective and reflexive approaches to hospitality enquiry. It extends the work of O’Gorman (2007) who investigated textual evidence of hospitality within Classical Antiquity (generally accepted as the period between 770 B.C. and 529 A.D.). The focus is on St. Benedict's Rule (c. 530 A.D.), which was written in the period immediately following Classical Antiquity, and is recognised by Borias (1974) as one
Conclusions
Within a higher education context, the journey from hospitality's historic origins and association primarily with management to a contemporary situation that supports the inter-relationship between and co-existence of, management and studies schools of thought has been traced, and academic advancement identified. Specifically, it recognises hospitality's ‘late entrant’ status as a university subject. Nevertheless, argument is presented to urge for a break-out from any apologetic or inferior
References (60)
- et al.
The Precinct experience: a phenomenological approach
Tourism Management
(2005) Sociological impressionism in a hospitality context
Annals of Tourism Research
(2005)Social scientific methodology and hospitality management
International Journal of Hospitality Management
(1983)- et al.
Hospitality research: the emperor's new clothes?
International Journal of Hospitality Management
(1996) Against social science?
International Journal of Hospitality Management
(1988)- et al.
Education for hospitality
- et al.
Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research
(2004) El Monasterio de Samos y La Hospitalidad Benedictina con el Peregrino
Studia Monastica
(1991)- et al.
Sociology on the Menu
(1997) French Hospitality: Racism and North African Immigrants
(1999)
Xeniteia-Philoxenia als Hilfe zur Interpretation von Regula Benedicti 53 im Zusammenhang mit Kapitel 58 und 66
Regulae Benedicti Studia
Hospitalité Augustinienne et Bénédictine
Revue de Histoire de Spiritualité
Hospitality management research: towards the future?
Hospitality and hospitality management
Gender and communication in the hospitality industry
Radical Hermeneutics. Repetition, Deconstruction, and the Hermeneutic Project
Introduction
Interpretive Interactionism
Hospitality, justice and responsibility: a dialogue with Jacques Derrida
Hospitality
Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities
Ancient Israel
The distribution of bars at Pompeii: archaeological, spatial and viewshed analyses
Journal of Roman Archaeology
The Pompeian Bar: archaeology and the role of food and drink outlets in an classical community
Food & History
RB 1980: The Rule of St. Benedict, In Latin and English with Notes
The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
Hospitality in Early Modern England
Empirical and hermeneutic approaches to phenomenological research in psychology: a comparison
Psychological Methods
Review of Hospitality Management
Die Behediktsregel: Eine Anleitung Zu Christlichem Leben
Cited by (49)
Conceptualising the “Hospitable Service Mindset” for the future hospitality workforce
2024, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism ManagementChallenges in hospitality management education: Perspectives from the United Kingdom
2017, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism ManagementHospitality higher education quality: Establishing standards in Australia
2017, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism ManagementCitation Excerpt :However, research in the hospitality field is broadening the connection to and interconnection among other disciplines. The relationships between and amongst staff, guests and host communities (Morrison & O'Gorman, 2008), along with the hospitality industry and its social environment, the consumer, the service encounter and work experience, are also important features in hospitality (Lashley, Lynch, & Morrison, 2007). Despite this growing body of research, hospitality education in Australia is still essentially focused on an examination of hospitality as an area of vocational study, including a range of related principles surrounding business, management and operations.
Tourism workforce research: A review, taxonomy and agenda
2016, Annals of Tourism ResearchCitation Excerpt :We conclude by reflecting on the implications of this review on tourism (and hospitality) workforce research by offering some concerns to the broader tourism academy to consider the applied implications, and we offer suggestions designed to guide future workforce researchers, enabling them to gain a level of recognition within the tourism academy commensurate with its significance. Before moving forward we wish to qualify the inclusion of hospitality research in this analysis of the tourism workforce, especially since the two areas have not always been the easiest of bedfellows (Morrison & O’Gorman, 2008). All tourists must sleep somewhere and all tourists must eat.
Convergence of Boundaries in Tourism, Hospitality, Events, and Leisure: Defining the Core and Knowledge Structure
2024, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism ResearchLocal government’s role in promoting city hospitality: a meta-ethnography with a public management perspective
2022, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management