International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Critical heat flux for CuO nanofluid fabricated by pulsed laser ablation differentiating deposition characteristics
Introduction
Critical heat flux (CHF) is characterized by a sudden reduction of the local heat transfer coefficient (HTC) that results from a transition from nucleate boiling to film boiling along with the heat transfer surface. With approaching CHF condition, a large abrupt decrease in the heat transfer coefficient in case of a heat flux-controlled system occurs while a sudden decrease in the heat transfer rate for a temperature-controlled system occurs. Of two, the former resulting in a jump in heated wall temperatures that may cause burnout is more important in applications such as power generation [1]. Needless to say that it is most important to be able to enhance CHF values in order to design a water-cooled device that is safe from burnout of the heated surface. Many methods to enhance the CHF have been investigated and nanofluids technology has been proposed as a new technique in recent years among these methods [2]. Nanofluids are a new class of nanotechnology-based transfer fluids engineered by dispersing and stably suspending nanoparticles in traditional heat transfer fluids such as water, ethylene glycol, and engine oil [3]. Relatively, the efficacy of use of nanofluid technology has been proven in CHF regime compared to other general heat transfer regime. Or, one of the most interesting characteristics of nanofluids is their capability to significantly enhance CHF [2], [4]. Since CHF is the upper limit of phase-change heat transfer of nucleate boiling as the most efficient heat transfer mode, such enhancement provides potential for major performance improvement in many practical applications related to thermal management problems such as electronic cooling and heat dissipation of high-thermal-load systems. Regarding CHF enhancement, however, there remain unclear points.
In particular, each level of enhancement varies in a wide spectrum depending on each kind of nanofluid and each research group. This may be due to the test duration and nanoparticle morphology, which result indifferent deposition morphology and hence differences in the enhancement ratio. On the other hand, there is a consensus that such enhancement is related to buildup of a deposition layer of nanoparticles during boiling of nanofluids [1], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. In order to prove this, some researchers indirectly showed that the deposition layer of nanoparticles reduced the contact angle and increased the capillary height in terms of surface wettability.
Recently, Park et al. [9] investigated the effects of newly-introduced graphene nanomaterials on pool boiling CHF. They interestingly reported that there were no surface wettability improvements in terms of contact angle and even capillary action whereas the CHF enhancement ratio was highest in graphene-oxide nanofluid when they compared that with other conventional nanofluids such as alumina. This result raised up a new question regarding CHF enhancement mechanisms. They argued that the CHF enhancement observed in the graphene-oxide nanofluid could not be explained by the well-known surface wettability improvement, but by reduction of the Taylor instability wavelength in relation to hydrodynamic instability as suggested by Liter and Kaviany [10] and Hwang and Kaviany [11] for surfaces with microporous coating [16].
Therefore, in order not to miss a true mechanism of CHF enhancement in nanofluids it is necessary to check all of the deposition characterizations such as contact angle, capillary height and instability wavelength at the same time and all together for each kind of nanofluid.
So far, evaluations about CHF enhancement for nanofluids with a variety of nanoparticles are abundant in the literature. However, there were very few efforts to investigate on the difference of CHF enhancement level according to nanoparticles deposition characteristics for a same kind of material, not in comparison with other kind of nanofluids. Therefore, we performed the pool boiling experiment with CuO nanofluids fabricated by both a pulsed laser ablation method (one-step method) and the particles dispersion method (two-step method) to make different deposition conditions. The various reasoning for difference in CHF values for nanofluids with a same kind of material, CuO (based on different preparation methods) are tried by measuring contact angle and capillary height indicating the surface wettability and even Taylor instability wavelength by a condensation method.
Section snippets
Nanofluids preparation and characterization
Cu pellets (manufactured by Alfa Aesar, 5.2 mm × 3.0 mm) were used as samples in one-step method of pulsed laser ablation in liquid and CuO nanoparticles manufactured by Alfa Aesar (true density = 6315 kg/m3) were used in the two-step method. CuO nanofluids at a concentration of 0.001 vol% are obtained by both one-step method with Cu pellets and two-step method with CuO nanoparticle for abase fluid of the deionized water. The process of preparation of CuO nanofluid made by two-step method is as
Results and discussion
The CHF enhancement level for same kind of nanofluids prepared by different preparation methods would depend on nanoparticles deposition characteristics, not the physical properties of the materials. The results of these experiments are listed in Table 2. The CHF value of CuO/DIW nanofluid made by one-step method of the PLAL is ∼300 kW/m2 larger than that made by two-step method.
To investigate the mechanisms of CHF enhancement, deposition layers on the heating surface after pool boiling
Conclusion
In order to investigate the CHF enhancement characteristics of CuO/DIW nanofluids according to nanoparticles deposition characteristics, pool boiling experiments were performed. The deposition characteristics were differentiated through applying the pulsed laser ablation method (PLAL) for the preparation of CuO nanofluid. The key idea to apply the PLAL is to control the morphology of nanoparticles. The CHF enhancement of CuO/DIW nanofluids compared with DIW was up to 2.6 times. It was observed
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Nuclear Energy Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology and by the Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy (No. 20114030200010).
References (18)
- et al.
Boiling heat transfer performance and phenomena of Al2O3–water nano-fluids from a plain surface in a pool
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
(2005) - et al.
Pool boiling heat transfer experiments in silica–water nano-fluids
Int. J. Heat mass Transfer
(2004) - et al.
Pool boiling characteristics of nano-fluids
Int. J. Heat mass Transfer
(2003) - et al.
Pool-boiling CHF enhancement by modulated porous-layer coating: theory and experiment
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
(2001) - et al.
Critical heat flux in thin, uniform particle coating
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
(2006) - et al.
Investigation of viscosity and thermal conductivity of SiC nanofluids for heat transfer applications
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
(2011) - et al.
Experimental studies on CHF characteristics of nano-fluids at pool boiling
J. Heat Transfer
(2007) - et al.
Characteristic stability of bare Au–water nanofluids fabricated by pulsed laser ablation in liquids
Opt. Lasers Eng.
(2009) - et al.
Effect of nanoparticles on critical heat flux of water in pool boiling heat transfer
Appl. Phys. Lett.
(2003)
Cited by (39)
Analysis of cascade vapor compression refrigeration system using nanorefrigerants: Energy, exergy, and environmental (3E)
2024, Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringNanofluid and nanopowders
2022, Micro and Nano Thermal Transport: Characterization, Measurement, and MechanismProgress on suspended nanostructured engineering materials powered solar distillation- a review
2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The BFs such as water, lubrication oils etc are ablated to dissolve solid metals including Au (gold), Cu & Ag. The fabrication of Cu and Ag water based nanofluids using this technique is described in Fig. 7 [91]. Using the pulsed laser ablation, the Au- water nanofluids are fabricated.
Thermophysical properties of nanofluids
2021, Nanofluids and Mass TransferAssessment of nanofluids pool boiling critical heat flux
2021, International Journal of Heat and Mass TransferDispersion and stability of metal oxide nanoparticles in aqueous suspension: A review
2019, Materials Today: ProceedingsCitation Excerpt :Chang et al. [6] used SANSS technique for preparing TiO2/water nanofluid. Lee et al. [10] prepared CuO/ De-ionized water (DI-water) nanofluid by pulsed laser ablation in liquids (PLAL) technique and found that the dispersion stability of nanofluid prepared by one step method is better than that of two step method. Tran and Soong [15] prepared Al2O3 nanofluid by a laser ablation method.