ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Volume 60, Issue 3, March 2004, Pages 381-416
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Article
Purchase PDF (1340 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.10.008    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Evaluating web sites: exploiting user's expectations

Maria De MarsicoCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and Stefano LevialdiE-mail The Corresponding Author

Department of Computer Science, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Via Salaria 113, 00198, Rome, Italy

Received 19 February 2003; 
accepted 24 October 2003. ;
Available online 5 January 2004.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

A new goal-based approach to measure usability of web sites is presented, strongly taking into account the customers’ expectations, which are often hardly foreseeable as a whole. After a general discussion on web site design issues, we present a short survey of evaluation methods currently used for web sites. We next introduce a new taxonomy of site categories in a three-dimensional space, derived from Aristotle's rhetorical triangle, including different aspects of the site designer's goals. In our approach, we use this taxonomy to identify a number of sites belonging to the same category, in order to carry out a comparative analysis of their features. This analysis is the basis for a two-shot generation of a form for the evaluation of that category of sites. In the first shot, the users fill a generic evaluation form, acquainting them with sites characteristics. They are next asked to perform specific tasks of their choice, according to what they expect from a site of the given category. They note their impressions and list those features they found useful; the analysis of their comments is exploited to formulate statements specific to the given category, to be added to the initial form (second shot). We found that the responses to the second, expanded form, provide more comprehensive criteria for site evaluation, and turn helpful to precisely locate flaws in site functionalities. After testing, our methodology has proved very promising and may be applied for the evaluation of any other site category, most of all those providing a set of special services.

Article Outline

1. Introduction
2. Web site design
2.1. Information representation and appearance
2.2. Access, navigation, orientation
2.3. Information architecture
2.4. Human-centered design
3. Current approaches to web usability evaluation
3.1. Questionnaires
3.2. Behavior observation tools
3.3. Automatic evaluation tools
4. A goal-based approach: COFUE (CoOperative Form between Users and Engineers)
4.1. A proposed taxonomy of web sites
4.2. Our approach
4.2.1. First shot
4.2.2. Second shot
4.3. Validation of the approach
4.3.1. Data from first shot
4.3.2. Data from second shot
4.3.3. Merged data
4.4. A final remark
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References












 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.