Inactivation of bacterial pathogens in yoba mutandabota, a dairy product fermented with the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus yoba
Introduction
Probiotic bacteria and their health effects are a focus of international food research. Incorporation of selected strains of the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus in milk products and lately in non-dairy products has been studied in detail (McMaster et al., 2005, Østlie et al., 2003, van Tienen et al., 2011). The beneficial effects of probiotic strains on the host and their mechanism of action have also been demonstrated quite well (Guandalini et al., 2000, Kankainen et al., 2009, von Ossowski et al., 2010). However, little information is available on the survival and growth of pathogens in dairy foods containing probiotic bacteria. Not only good survival of the probiotic bacteria in food products during their specified shelf life is essential, but also the potential antimicrobial action of the probiotic bacteria against contaminating pathogens during the production process and shelf life is relevant.
Mutandabota is a non-fermented, milk-based food consumed daily as a major source of proteins and micronutrients, and it is also sometimes used as a weaning food for infants in Southern Africa (Zimbabwe Ministry of Agriculture, 2001). The product is made by mixing raw cow's or goat's milk 79% (wt/wt), dry baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) fruit pulp 14% (wt/wt) and sugar 7% (wt/wt) (Mpofu et al., 2014a). Mutandabota has a thick, yoghurt-like consistency, a sour taste and a pH of 3.4 ± 0.1. Generally, low pH products are regarded as microbiologically stable and safe to eat (ICMSF, 2002). However, observations on preparation of traditional mutandabota evoked questions about its potential role as a vehicle for food-borne microbial infections. The traditional method utilizes raw milk, which raises a food safety concern since the milk may contain pathogenic bacteria like Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes and Campylobacter jejuni, which can cause illness in humans (Kumbhar et al., 2009, Nanu et al., 2007). Coliforms and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli have been isolated in raw milk in Zimbabwe and South Africa (Gran et al., 2002, Ibtisam et al., 2008, Mhone et al., 2011). Preparation of mutandabota is carried out at household level in a shaded open space and does not use aseptic techniques. When mutandabota is contaminated by pathogens and then consumed, it might cause microbial infection amongst its consumers.
On the basis of mutandabota, a variant of mutandabota fermented with the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus yoba (referred to as yoba mutandabota) was developed to enable resource-poor populations in Southern Africa to benefit from a functional food (Mpofu et al., 2014b). L. rhamnosus yoba was isolated from a commercially available product, containing L. rhamnosus GG. The identity of the isolate was confirmed by 16S rRNA sequencing and the isolate was deposited at the Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of microorganisms/Laboratorium voor Microbiologie Gent (BCCM/LMG) culture collection under the name of L. rhamnosus yoba (Kort and Sybesma, 2012). There is evidence of beneficial effects of L. rhamnosus GG based on clinical trials with double-blind and placebo-controlled cross-over designs for prevention and treatment of diarrhea and gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tract infections in children (Grandy et al., 2010, Hojsak et al., 2010, Guandalini et al., 2000). For the production of yoba mutandabota, a new process was designed based on traditional mutandabota preparation procedures. Two major steps were incorporated into the traditional procedure, namely the boiling of raw milk and fermentation with L. rhamnosus yoba. Contamination of the product with pathogenic bacteria may occur after the heat treatment; bacterial pathogens have been isolated from pasteurized milk and products from pasteurized milk (Beukes et al., 2001, Gran et al., 2002, Nyatoti et al., 1997). Producing yoba mutandabota through fermentation might enhance its microbiological safety. This study was performed to investigate the survival of bacterial pathogens in traditional and yoba mutandabota.
Section snippets
Preparation of L. rhamnosus yoba inoculum
An isolate of the probiotic bacterium L. rhamnosus GG, under the name L. rhamnosus yoba (Kort and Sybesma, 2012), was used in this study. The bacterium was obtained from Yoba for Life Foundation (http://www.yoba4life.com), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. It was stored at − 80 °C, before being freeze-dried for long-term storage at 4 °C in 50 mL tubes (Greiner Bio-One, BV, Alphen a/d Rijn, The Netherlands). To prepare the inoculum, baobab fruit pulp was added to UHT full-fat cow's milk to a concentration
pH changes in traditional and yoba mutandabota
The time course of acidification in traditional mutandabota was similar in all experiments with the 5 cocktails of bacterial pathogens (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6). The pH was 3.5 (n = 15) immediately after preparation when mutandabota was ready for consumption at time 0 h (t = 0). This pH-value remained rather constant throughout the 24 h potential consumption time, also regarded as the storage period, and at t = 24 the pH was 3.4 ± 0.1. The low pH could be attributed to the acidic nature of
Conclusion
This study focused on the question whether five important pathogens, namely, L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., C. jejuni, E. coli O157:H7 and B. cereus, could pose a foodborne risk to consumers of both traditional and yoba mutandabota. In traditional mutandabota (pH 3.5) no viable B. cereus and C. jejuni were detected 3 h after inoculation. However, L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and E. coli O157:H7 significantly declined (P < 0.05), but could still be detected at the end of the storage
Acknowledgments
The authors thank NUFFIC (Grant award number CF6631/2010) for financial assistance, Yoba for Life Foundation for supplying the Lactobacillus rhamnosus yoba strain, and Dr. Eelco Franz for the supply of Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains from Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
References (58)
- et al.
Bacteriocins: modes of action and potentials in food preservation and control of food poisoning
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
(1995) - et al.
Cell growth and bacteriocin production of probiotic Lactobacillus strains in different media
Int. Dairy J.
(2004) - et al.
Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7, O111:H and O26:H11 in artificially contaminated chocolate and confectionery products
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
(2004) - et al.
The microbiology of South African traditional fermented milks
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
(2001) - et al.
Thermal inactivation of Campylobacter species, Yersinia enterocolitica, and hemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in fluid milk
J. Dairy Sci.
(1988) - et al.
Salmonellae, salmonellosis and dairy foods: a review
J. Dairy Sci.
(1992) - et al.
Smallholder dairy processing in Zimbabwe: hygienic practices during milking and the microbiological quality of the milk at the farm and on delivery
Food Control
(2002) - et al.
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the prevention of gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections in children who attend day care centers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Clin. Nutr.
(2010) - et al.
Incidence and ecology of Campylobacter jejuni and coli in animals
Food Microbiol.
(2009) - et al.
Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
Lancet
(2001)
Probiotics for every body
Trends Biotechnol.
Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case–control study
Lancet
Kinetic analysis of the antibacterial activity of probiotic lactobacilli towards Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium reveals a role for lactic acid and other inhibitory compounds
Res. Microbiol.
Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of probiotic bacteria against Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium 1344 in a common medium under different environmental conditions
Res. Microbiol.
Use of traditional African fermented beverages as delivery vehicles for Bifidobacterium lactis DSM 10140
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
Aerobic bacterial, coliform, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus counts of raw and processed milk from selected smallholder dairy farms of Zimbabwe
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
Development of a locally sustainable functional food based on mutandabota, a traditional food in southern Africa
J. Dairy Sci.
Antimicrobial properties of lactic acid bacteria and yeast-LAB cultures isolated from traditional fermented milk against pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella Enteritidis strains
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
Pathogenic Escherichia coli in traditional African weaning foods
Food Control
Growth and metabolism of selected strains of probiotic bacteria in milk
Int. J. Food Microbiol.
Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella in juice concentrates
J. Food Prot.
Survival of Campylobacter jejuni and pathogenic Escherichia coli in mahewu, a fermented cereal gruel
Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.
Incidence and characterization of enterotoxigenic Bacillus cereus in some dairy products
Suez Canal Vet. Med. J.
Sugars and organic acids in Adansonia digitata L.
J. Univ. Bombay
Lactic acid permeabilises Gram negative bacteria by disrupting the outer membrane
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
Characterization of Bacillus cereus isolated from raw milk and some dairy products
Suez Canal Vet. Med. J.
Beneficial lactobacilli in food and feed: long-term use, biodiversity and proposals for specific and realistic safety assessments
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
Probiotics for treatment of acute diarrhea in children: randomised clinical trial of five different preparations
Br. Med. J.
Ascorbic acid content of baobab fruit
Nature
Cited by (29)
African fermented vegetable and fruit-based products
2023, Indigenous Fermented Foods for the TropicsPresence of pathogenic microorganisms in fermented foods
2023, Indigenous Fermented Foods for the TropicsMicroorganisms and food safety risks associated with indigenous fermented foods from Africa
2021, Food ControlCitation Excerpt :Fermented foods are generally considered safe. Fermenting organisms, especially LAB, produce a range of antimicrobial compounds, e.g., organic acids, ethanol, bacteriocins and hydrogen peroxide, which are antagonistic to the growth and survival of foodborne pathogens (Adinsi et al., 2017; De Vuyst and Vandamme, 1994; Mpofu et al., 2016). Cason et al. (2020) reported the decline of pathogenic and spoilage organisms during cereal fermentation for sesotho production.
Freeze-drying of Enterococcus durans: Effect on their probiotics and biopreservative properties
2021, LWTCitation Excerpt :Although it can be assumed that they should be absent in commercial products due to the strict hygienic control in food industry, contamination can occur because of an inadequate manipulation by consumers, with important cost for the health system. For this reason, some recent works have explored the addition of biopreservative microorganisms (Kalkan, 2020; Mpofu et al., 2016; Muthukumarasamy & Holley, 2007). Although the presence of E. durans in cream cheese did not decrease the contamination with E. coli, in the presence of this strain, we observed that S. aureus is undetectable after 5 days of storage at 4 °C.
Invited review: Probiotic yogurt quality criteria, regulatory framework, clinical evidence, and analytical aspects
2021, Journal of Dairy Science