Elsevier

Icarus

Volume 192, Issue 1, 1 December 2007, Pages 41-55
Icarus

Time-varying interaction of Europa with the jovian magnetosphere: Constraints on the conductivity of Europa's subsurface ocean

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2007.06.024Get rights and content

Abstract

We study the conductivity distribution inside Europa by using a time-dependent 3D-model of the temporal periodic interaction between Europa and the jovian magnetosphere. The temporal variations are caused by periodic variations of the magnetospheric plasma and magnetic fields at Europa. We develop a model which describes simultaneously the 3D plasma interaction of Europa's atmosphere with Jupiter's magnetosphere and the electromagnetic induction in a subsurface conducting layer due to time-varying magnetic fields including their mutual feedbacks. We find that inclusion of the magnetic field perturbations caused by the interaction with Jupiter's magnetospheric plasma is important for interpreting Galileo's magnetic field measurements near Europa. This leads to improved constraints on the conductivity and thickness of Europa's subsurface ocean. We find for the conductivity of Europa's ocean values of 500 mS/m or larger combined with ocean thicknesses of 100 km and smaller to be most suitable to explain the magnetic flyby data. In summary, this results in the following relation: electrical conductivity × ocean thickness 50 S/mkm. It is shown that the influence of the fields induced by the time variable plasma interaction is small compared to the induction caused by the time-varying background field, although some aspects of the plasma interaction are changed appreciably.

Introduction

Galileo measurements of Europa's gravitational field and modeling show Europa to be a differentiated satellite consisting of a metallic core, a silicate mantle and a water ice–liquid outer shell. The minimum water ice–liquid outer shell thickness is about 80 km for plausible mantle densities (Anderson et al., 1998). High resolution data obtained with the Solid State Imaging (SSI) system show evidence of a young and thin, cracked and ruptured ice shell (e.g., Belton et al., 1996, Carr et al., 1998). The geological observations imply that warm, convecting material existed at shallow depths within the subsurface at the time of its recent geological deformation. Global-scale tectonic patterns can be explained by nonsynchronous rotation and tidal flexing of a thin ice shell above a liquid water ocean (Geissler et al., 1998, Greenberg et al., 2000). The water layer is likely comprised of three sub-layers: an outer, brittle/elastic ice layer, an underlying ductile layer of potentially convecting ice, and a lower layer of liquid. Estimates of the thickness of the ice layer (including the lower ductile layer) range from a few km to 60 km (e.g., Schenk, 2002, Hussmann et al., 2002). However, while the evidence for liquid water in the past is favorable, there is no unambiguous indication from spacecraft imaging that such conditions exist today (Pappalardo et al., 1999).

Thermal models indicate that a significant portion of the outer water shell could be liquid today (e.g., Squyres et al., 1983, Schubert et al., 1986, Spohn and Schubert, 2003). One energy source for maintaining a liquid water ocean is tidal heating caused by the three-body Laplace resonance with Io and Ganymede. This process could offset the freezing of the water ocean by subsolidus ice convection (e.g., Cassen et al., 1979). The major uncertainty in modeling is the rheology of ice (Durham and Stern, 2001). Also, the rate of freezing of the internal ocean depends on its composition, since the occurrence of minor constituents in the ice and ocean such as hydrated salt minerals (McCord et al., 1998) and ammonia (Kargel et al., 1991, Deschamps and Sotin, 2001) effect the rheology of the ice and the freezing temperature of the ocean.

The strongest indication for a liquid water ocean at present time comes from the magnetic field observations (Kivelson et al., 1999, Kivelson et al., 2000; Khurana et al., 1998). Europa has no detectable permanent internal magnetic field (Schilling et al., 2004). The magnetic field data show evidence for electromagnetic induction taking place in the interior of Europa due to the time-varying external magnetic field (Neubauer, 1998a, Neubauer, 1998b; Khurana et al., 1998). Therefore, the observations support the idea, that a global subsurface conducting layer may be present. In addition, there are magnetic field perturbations owing to the interaction of Europa's atmosphere with the jovian magnetospheric plasma. These time-varying magnetic field perturbations are permanently there on top of the induction signature compromising their interpretation. While induction signatures are clearly visible in the data when Europa is well outside Jupiter's current sheet, the strong plasma interaction dominates and hides the induction effect when Europa is close to the center of the current sheet (Kivelson et al., 1999).

An atmosphere at Europa was detected by Hall et al. (1995) with the Hubble Space Telescope Goddard High-Resolution Spectrograph. The observations imply molecular oxygen column densities in the range of (214)×1018 m−2 (Hall et al., 1998). The atmosphere of Europa is produced by the interaction of energetic charged particles with Europa's surface (e.g., Johnson et al., 2004). Shematovich et al. (2005) find by using a collisional 1D Monte Carlo model of Europa's atmosphere that the atmosphere is more strongly structured in the radial direction than previously assumed and that the near-surface region of the atmosphere is determined by both water and oxygen photochemistry. Recent images of Europa's atomic oxygen emission obtained with the HST Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) indicate that the surface is not icy everywhere, but that the composition varies with longitude (McGrath et al., 2004). Atomic Na and K are observed in the extended atmosphere (Brown and Hill, 1996, Brown, 2001). They occur in a ratio different from that at Io (Na/K is 25 for Europa and 10 for Io), and from meteoritic or solar abundance ratios (Brown, 2001, Johnson et al., 2002). Therefore a subsurface source of alkalis is suggested (Johnson et al., 2002, Leblanc et al., 2002). A recent review on Europa's atmosphere can be found in McGrath et al. (2004).

Kliore et al. (1997) detected an ionosphere on Europa by using Galileo radio occultation measurements. They derived a maximum electron density of about 10,000 cm−3 with a scale height of 240 km. By assuming a spherically symmetric ionosphere for each derived electron density profile, Kliore et al. (1997) found a strongly asymmetric ionosphere with maximum densities on the flanks and minimum densities downstream. The main source of Europa's ionosphere is electron impact ionization (Saur et al., 1998).

Zimmer et al. (2000) investigated the implications of the observed induced magnetic fields for the electrical structure of Europa's interior. By using a simple shell model they set bounds on the characteristics of the current carrying layer. Zimmer et al. (2000) find that the magnetic signature at Europa is consistent with more than 70% of the induced dipole moment expected for a perfectly conducting sphere. Therefore, currents are required which flow in a shell with conductivity of at least 60 mS/m and close to the surface (within a 200–300 km depth). Zimmer et al. (2000) argue that solid ice, an ionosphere or a conducting core cannot reproduce the amplitude of the observed magnetic perturbation. In addition, Zimmer et al. (2000) argue that it seems to be very unlikely that the magnetic signature can be explained by induction taking place in a conducting mantle only. They therefore support the idea of a subsurface ocean. However, they do not take into account the plasma interaction of Europa with the jovian magnetosphere, which we show to be important for the interpretation of Galileo's magnetic field measurements near Europa. Instead they treat magnetic field perturbations due to local plasma currents as a systematic error.

Previous models of Europa's interaction with the jovian magnetosphere considered either the plasma interaction only (Saur et al., 1998), included an intrinsic dipole moment as a free parameter but did not include the induced magnetic field self-consistently (Kabin et al., 1999, Liu et al., 2000), or they focused on the electromagnetic induction process inside Europa (Zimmer et al., 2000). For example, Kabin et al. (1999) included an intrinsic dipole moment as a free parameter, where they fitted their model results to the data of Galileo's first Europa flyby. Depending on their model parameters they find different values for the internal dipole moment. When rotating the plasma flow upstream of Europa by 20°, their intrinsic dipole moment is close to the direction of an induced dipole moment, but with a small magnitude of about 70% of that obtained by Kivelson et al. (1999).

In this paper we combine the electromagnetic induction process inside Europa and the interaction with the ambient magnetospheric plasma and consider their interdependency. This allows us to improve the results of Zimmer et al. (2000) and thus to further constrain the nature of the internal conducting layer. The time-dependent interaction between Europa and the jovian magnetosphere includes the local plasma interaction of Europa's atmosphere and ionosphere as well as the interaction of a potential internal ocean with the magnetosphere of Jupiter. Due to Jupiter's rotation with respect to Europa and the inclination of Jupiter's magnetic dipole moment, the magnetospheric plasma density and the background magnetic field vary at the position of Europa. The time-varying magnetic fields induce currents in an electrically conducting ocean below the Europan ice crust. These currents generate a time-varying induced magnetic field which influences the plasma interaction. In addition, the periodic variations of the magnetospheric plasma and the interaction with the atmosphere lead to a secondary induction effect. To study this time-dependent interaction, we develop, for the first time, a three-dimensional single-fluid MHD model which includes periodic magnetic fields from the interior of the Moon.

In Section 2, we give a basic overview of the “classical” electromagnetic induction problem applied to Europa. The induced magnetic fields derived in this section are part of our interaction model. In Section 3, we introduce our model of the plasma interaction and describe how the induction is implemented self-consistently. We also describe the procedure used to determine the plasma induced magnetic fields. In Section 4, we then present and discuss the results of our full numerical model. We investigate the influence of the plasma interaction on the induction process. By comparing our model results with the Galileo spacecraft in situ measurements we determine the so far strongest constraints on the conductivity of Europa's ocean. In Section 5, we summarize our results.

Before proceeding we define the coordinate system used in this work. We use the EPhiO coordinate system centered at Europa with its z-axis along Jupiter's spin axis, the y-axis along the radius vector towards Jupiter (positive inward) and the x-axis azimuthal with respect to Jupiter, i.e., in the ideal corotation direction.

Section snippets

The electromagnetic induction problem

We begin with a description of the electromagnetic induction process at Europa. In this section we describe the model of Europa's internal electrical structure used in this paper. We derive the analytical solution for the internal induced magnetic field which is part of our interaction model presented in the following section.

For studying the interior of the Galilean satellites electromagnetic induction sounding is well suited because Jupiter provides a strong primary signal. The orbit of

Concept

The basic idea of this paper is to study the time-dependent plasma interaction of Europa's atmosphere and its proposed internal ocean with the jovian magnetosphere. We describe the plasma environment of Europa with a three-dimensional single-fluid MHD model and solve the MHD flow problem and the internal induction problem simultaneously. Since both effects interact, the MHD equations are rewritten such that the induced magnetic field is explicitly included.

Mass balance

Magnetospheric plasma is convected

Harmonic coefficients of the plasma induced magnetic fields

After deriving the spherical harmonic coefficients (also called Gauss coefficients) of the plasma induced magnetic fields for each time ti, we do a Fourier expansion of these coefficients. This enables us to calculate the harmonic coefficients at any time t. Hence, we are able to calculate the plasma induced magnetic field at any point and at any time t. Fig. 3 shows the harmonic dipole and quadrupole coefficients of the plasma induced magnetic fields during Jupiter's synodical period for an

Conclusions

We have developed a self-consistent 3D Model of the time-dependent plasma interaction of Europa's atmosphere and it's internal ocean with the jovian magnetosphere. The full inclusion of the time-dependent induced magnetic fields in our model, which is not straightforward, is the main advantage over previous models of Europa's interaction, which considered either only the plasma interaction or only the electromagnetic induction process inside Europa. This allows us to calculate the plasma

Acknowledgements

N.S. was partly supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and partly by DLR.

References (58)

  • G. Backus et al.

    Foundations of Geomagnetism

    (1996)
  • P.M. Banks et al.

    Aeronomy, vol. A

    (1973)
  • M.J.S. Belton et al.

    Galileo's first images of Jupiter and the Galilean satellites

    Science

    (1996)
  • R.J. Blakely

    Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications

    (1995)
  • M.E. Brown et al.

    Discovery of an extended sodium atmosphere around Europa

    Nature

    (1996)
  • M.H. Carr et al.

    Evidence for a subsurface ocean on Europa

    Nature

    (1998)
  • P. Cassen et al.

    Is there liquid water on Europa

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (1979)
  • J.E.P. Connerney et al.

    Modeling the jovian current sheet and inner magnetosphere

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1981)
  • F. Deschamps et al.

    Thermal convection in the outer shell of large icy satellites

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2001)
  • A.J. Dessler

    Physics of the Jovian Magnetosphere

    (1983)
  • W.B. Durham et al.

    Rheological properties of water ice-applications to satellites of the outer planets

    Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.

    (2001)
  • P.E. Geissler et al.

    Evidence for non-synchronous rotation of Europa

    Nature

    (1998)
  • R. Greenberg et al.

    Habitability of Europa's crust: The role of tidal-tectonic processes

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2000)
  • D.T. Hall et al.

    Detection of an oxygen atmosphere on Jupiter's moon Europa

    Nature

    (1995)
  • D.T. Hall et al.

    The far-ultraviolet oxygen airglow of Europa and Ganymede

    Astrophys. J.

    (1998)
  • H. Hussmann et al.

    Thermal equilibrium states of Europa's ice shell: Implications for internal ocean thickness and surface heat flow

    Icarus

    (2002)
  • Y. Itikawa et al.

    Cross sections for collisions of electrons and photons with oxygen molecules

    J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data

    (1989)
  • R.E. Johnson et al.

    Radiation effects on the surfaces of the Galilean satellites

  • K. Kabin et al.

    On Europa's magnetospheric interaction: A MHD simulation of the E4 flyby

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Induced magnetic moments from a nearly spherical ocean

      2021, Icarus
      Citation Excerpt :

      In most cases, little is known about planetary interiors. Interpretation of spacecraft magnetic measurements requires a careful accounting of the plasma environment and ionospheric effects in addition to planetary fields (Schilling et al., 2007). However, there remains a need for techniques capable of constraining the interior structure.

    • Parallel Electron Beams at Io: Numerical Simulations of the Dense Plasma Wake

      2024, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text